[#34033] The rights of ruby-core people and Myth of ruby-dev — "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...>

Some of you may don't know your rights.

32 messages 2011/01/03
[#34067] Re: The rights of ruby-core people and Myth of ruby-dev — Aaron Patterson <aaron@...> 2011/01/04

On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 06:55:47AM +0900, NARUSE, Yui wrote:

[#34043] proposal: gem_prelude needs to die — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>

I think it is time for gem_prelude to die.

21 messages 2011/01/04
[#34077] Re: proposal: gem_prelude needs to die — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2011/01/05

2011/1/4 Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@zenspider.com>:

[#34091] Moving to Git? — Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@...>

Hi,

87 messages 2011/01/05
[#34099] Re: Moving to Git? — KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...> 2011/01/05

> Hi,

[#34103] Re: Moving to Git? — "U.Nakamura" <usa@...> 2011/01/05

Hello,

[#34105] Re: Moving to Git? — Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@...> 2011/01/05

Em 05-01-2011 13:15, U.Nakamura escreveu:

[#34106] Re: Moving to Git? — "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...> 2011/01/05

(2011/01/06 0:46), Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas wrote:

[#34112] Re: Moving to Git? — Jon <jon.forums@...> 2011/01/05

> > Well, I guess I can help listing some advantages. Using git:

[#34118] Re: Moving to Git? — mathew <meta@...> 2011/01/05

On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 11:28, Jon <jon.forums@gmail.com> wrote:

[#34121] Re: Moving to Git? — Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@...> 2011/01/05

Em 05-01-2011 17:16, mathew escreveu:

[#34129] Re: Moving to Git? — mathew <meta@...> 2011/01/05

On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 13:23, Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas

[#34138] Re: Moving to Git? — Czarek <cezary.baginski@...> 2011/01/05

On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 06:50:24AM +0900, mathew wrote:

[#34188] Re: Moving to Git? — mathew <meta@...> 2011/01/06

On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 17:02, Czarek <cezary.baginski@gmail.com> wrote:

[#34191] Re: Moving to Git? — Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@...> 2011/01/06

On 07/01/11 at 01:05 +0900, mathew wrote:

[#34201] Re: Moving to Git? — mathew <meta@...> 2011/01/06

On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 10:36, Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@lucas-nussbaum.net> wrote:

[#34206] Re: Moving to Git? — Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@...> 2011/01/07

On 07/01/11 at 08:07 +0900, mathew wrote:

[#34227] Re: Moving to Git? — mathew <meta@...> 2011/01/07

On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 23:50, Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@lucas-nussbaum.net> wrote:

[#34231] Re: Moving to Git? — Daniel Bovensiepen <bovensiepen@...> 2011/01/07

Dear all,

[#34116] Re: Moving to Git? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2011/01/05

Hi,

[#34117] Re: Moving to Git? — Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@...> 2011/01/05

What kind of Redmine integration you are talking about? We use Redmine

[#34120] Re: Moving to Git? — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2011/01/05

Hi,

[#34125] Re: Moving to Git? — Nikolai Weibull <now@...> 2011/01/05

On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 19:57, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:

[#34124] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4235][Open] svn keywords in code prevent correct building of ruby using git mirror — Stephen Bannasch <redmine@...>

Bug #4235: svn keywords in code prevent correct building of ruby using git mirror

12 messages 2011/01/05

[#34171] [Ruby 1.8-Feature#4239][Open] Let's begin a talk for "1.8.8" -- How's needed for surviving 1.8? — Shota Fukumori <redmine@...>

Feature #4239: Let's begin a talk for "1.8.8" -- How's needed for surviving 1.8?

104 messages 2011/01/06
[#34514] [Ruby 1.8-Feature#4239] Let's begin a talk for "1.8.8" -- How's needed for surviving 1.8? — Zeno Davatz <redmine@...> 2011/01/15

Issue #4239 has been updated by Zeno Davatz.

[#34516] Re: [Ruby 1.8-Feature#4239] Let's begin a talk for "1.8.8" -- How's needed for surviving 1.8? — "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...> 2011/01/15

(2011/01/16 0:11), Zeno Davatz wrote:

[#34214] [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4247][Open] New features for Array#sample, Array#choice — Yoji Ojima <redmine@...>

Feature #4247: New features for Array#sample, Array#choice

10 messages 2011/01/07

[#34267] [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4254][Open] Allow method transplanting — Jonas Pfenniger <redmine@...>

Feature #4254: Allow method transplanting

23 messages 2011/01/09
[#34280] Re: [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4254][Open] Allow method transplanting — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2011/01/10

Hi,

[#34299] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4256][Open] [BUG] Segmentation fault ruby 1.9.2p0 (2010-08-18) [i386-mingw32] — Rama Mahendravada <redmine@...>

Bug #4256: [BUG] Segmentation fault ruby 1.9.2p0 (2010-08-18) [i386-mingw32]

9 messages 2011/01/10

[#34318] ext/bigdecimal/lib/bigdecimal/util.rb — Aaron Patterson <aaron@...>

Hi Murata!

14 messages 2011/01/11
[#34321] Re: ext/bigdecimal/lib/bigdecimal/util.rb — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2011/01/11

Hi,

[#34354] [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4264][Open] General type coercion protocol for Ruby — Charles Nutter <redmine@...>

Feature #4264: General type coercion protocol for Ruby

33 messages 2011/01/11
[#34359] Re: [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4264][Open] General type coercion protocol for Ruby — Jim Weirich <jim.weirich@...> 2011/01/11

[#34355] [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4265][Open] Provide a core method Kernel#ruby for invoking a new Ruby instance — Charles Nutter <redmine@...>

Feature #4265: Provide a core method Kernel#ruby for invoking a new Ruby instance

15 messages 2011/01/11

[#34362] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4266][Open] Timeouts in threads cause "ThreadError: deadlock; recursive locking" — Christopher Bottaro <redmine@...>

Bug #4266: Timeouts in threads cause "ThreadError: deadlock; recursive locking"

12 messages 2011/01/11

[#34399] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4272][Open] rb_enc_str_new() causes segmentfault when using threads in parallel — Iñaki Baz Castillo <redmine@...>

Bug #4272: rb_enc_str_new() causes segmentfault when using threads in parallel

14 messages 2011/01/12

[#34534] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4283][Open] Timeout.timeout may cause application exit unintetionally — Motohiro KOSAKI <redmine@...>

Bug #4283: Timeout.timeout may cause application exit unintetionally

11 messages 2011/01/17

[#34537] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4285][Open] Ruby don't have asynchrounous exception safe syntax and It should have. — Motohiro KOSAKI <redmine@...>

Bug #4285: Ruby don't have asynchrounous exception safe syntax and It should have.

12 messages 2011/01/17

[#34550] [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4288][Open] Allow invoking arbitrary method names with foo."something" syntax — Charles Nutter <redmine@...>

Feature #4288: Allow invoking arbitrary method names with foo."something" syntax

13 messages 2011/01/18
[#34616] Re: [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4288][Open] Allow invoking arbitrary method names with foo."something" syntax — Gary Wright <gwtmp01@...> 2011/01/19

[#34577] Importing rubygems 1.5.0 (release candidate) into trunk. — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>

I'm going to be committing rubygems 1.5.0 into trunk in a bit.

13 messages 2011/01/18

[#34632] Ruby operator equivalent to Groovy's "?." — Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@...>

One of the few things I like in Groovy that Ruby doesn't support is

19 messages 2011/01/20

[#34634] Returning from the callee — Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@...>

Sometimes it is useful to be able to return from the callee method.

15 messages 2011/01/20

[#34648] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4298][Open] Duration of calling String#[] with the same index is strangely related to string length. — Radosław Bułat <redmine@...>

Bug #4298: Duration of calling String#[] with the same index is strangely related to string length.

13 messages 2011/01/20

[#34861] [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4326][Open] Fiber should respond to call() and [] — Aaron Patterson <redmine@...>

Feature #4326: Fiber should respond to call() and []

21 messages 2011/01/26
[#34943] [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4326] Fiber should respond to call() and [] — Charles Nutter <redmine@...> 2011/01/28

Issue #4326 has been updated by Charles Nutter.

[#34954] Re: [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4326] Fiber should respond to call() and [] — Aaron Patterson <aaron@...> 2011/01/28

On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 02:58:46AM +0900, Charles Nutter wrote:

[#34957] Re: [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4326] Fiber should respond to call() and [] — Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...> 2011/01/29

On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 5:29 PM, Aaron Patterson

[#34869] make ruby support line continuations ? — Marc Chantreux <khatar@...>

hello,

22 messages 2011/01/26
[#34878] Re: make ruby support line continuations ? — Jim Freeze <jimfreeze@...> 2011/01/26

> I love it so much i tried it in ruby. trying to rewrite:

[#34887] Re: make ruby support line continuations ? — Marc Chantreux <khatar@...> 2011/01/27

hello,

[#34889] Re: make ruby support line continuations ? — V咜 Ondruch <v.ondruch@...> 2011/01/27

Dne 27.1.2011 7:15, Marc Chantreux napsal(a):

[#34911] The ruby-lang.org downloads page should include RVM for OS X — Andrew Vos <andrew.vos@...>

(I sent this before I subscribed and I'm not sure if it bounced. Sorry if

21 messages 2011/01/27
[#34912] Re: The ruby-lang.org downloads page should include RVM for OS X — "Shota Fukumori (sora_h)" <sorah@...> 2011/01/27

RVM is not official, and makes problem more difficult. (magically

[#34913] Re: The ruby-lang.org downloads page should include RVM for OS X — Andrew Vos <andrew.vos@...> 2011/01/27

What do you mean by "official"? Also, what does it make more difficult? Do

[#34914] Re: The ruby-lang.org downloads page should include RVM for OS X — "Shota Fukumori (sora_h)" <sorah@...> 2011/01/27

return mail is gmail thing. I have same problem.

[#34970] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4343][Open] Dir.glob does match files without extension — Vit Ondruch <redmine@...>

Bug #4343: Dir.glob does match files without extension

26 messages 2011/01/29
[#34975] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4343] Dir.glob does match files without extension — Nobuyoshi Nakada <redmine@...> 2011/01/29

Issue #4343 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.

[#34978] Re: [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4343] Dir.glob does match files without extension — Jeremy Bopp <jeremy@...> 2011/01/29

On 01/29/2011 10:19 AM, Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:

[#34979] Re: [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4343] Dir.glob does match files without extension — Vít Ondruch <v.ondruch@...> 2011/01/29

Dne 29.1.2011 17:27, Jeremy Bopp napsal(a):

[#34981] Re: [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4343] Dir.glob does match files without extension — Jeremy Bopp <jeremy@...> 2011/01/29

On 01/29/2011 10:33 AM, Vテュt Ondruch wrote:

[#34982] Re: [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4343] Dir.glob does match files without extension — Vít Ondruch <v.ondruch@...> 2011/01/29

Dne 29.1.2011 17:53, Jeremy Bopp napsal(a):

[ruby-core:34956] [Archive91-Backport#4339] Segmentation fault during Marshal.load

From: Sean Bradly <redmine@...>
Date: 2011-01-29 00:14:30 UTC
List: ruby-core #34956
Issue #4339 has been updated by Sean Bradly.


Including a gdb trace. This issue happens in the mark_load_arg function when st_foreach encounters a corrupt bin ptr. I have seen similar failures occur in marshal_dump_arg. Also, _very_ rarely the st_table_entry list of one of the bins will become circularly linked, causing an infinite loop.

Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x001c86b6 in st_foreach (table=0x3cb3c0, func=0x178f40 <mark_entry>, arg=0) at st.c:486
486             for(ptr = table->bins[i]; ptr != 0;) {
(gdb) bt
#0  0x001c86b6 in st_foreach (table=0x3cb3c0, func=0x178f40 <mark_entry>, arg=0) at st.c:486
#1  0x001786c3 in mark_tbl (tbl=0x0) at gc.c:716
#2  rb_mark_tbl (tbl=0x0) at gc.c:723
#3  0x00189c04 in mark_load_arg (ptr=0xbfffca3c) at marshal.c:841
#4  0x00178d7e in gc_mark_children (ptr=3086829960, lev=1) at gc.c:1025
#5  0x00178a71 in mark_locations_array (x=<value optimized out>, n=<value optimized out>) at gc.c:684
#6  0x00157b95 in thread_mark (th=0x8087300) at eval.c:10466
#7  0x00178d7e in gc_mark_children (ptr=3086830120, lev=3) at gc.c:1025
#8  0x00178d06 in gc_mark_children (ptr=<value optimized out>, lev=<value optimized out>) at gc.c:1006
#9  0x00178e18 in gc_mark_children (ptr=<value optimized out>, lev=<value optimized out>) at gc.c:1057
#10 0x001791de in garbage_collect () at gc.c:1465
#11 0x00179be7 in rb_gc () at gc.c:1530
#12 0x00179c17 in rb_gc_start () at gc.c:1547
#13 0x00159a9d in call_cfunc (func=0x179c00 <rb_gc_start>, recv=3978176, len=0, argc=0, argv=0x0) at eval.c:5781
#14 0x00164a09 in rb_call0 (klass=<value optimized out>, recv=<value optimized out>, id=5313, oid=5313, argc=0, argv=0x0, body=0xb7fd88bc, flags=<value optimized out>) at eval.c:5928
#15 0x00164baa in rb_call (klass=3086846160, recv=3086846180, mid=5313, argc=0, argv=0x0, scope=0, self=3086911820) at eval.c:6176
#16 0x00161e7b in rb_eval (self=<value optimized out>, n=<value optimized out>) at eval.c:3506
#17 0x00163404 in rb_yield_0 (val=<value optimized out>, self=<value optimized out>, klass=0, flags=<value optimized out>, avalue=0) at eval.c:5095
#18 0x0016e657 in rb_yield (val=3) at eval.c:5179
#19 0x0018e641 in int_dotimes (num=201) at numeric.c:2960
#20 0x00159a9d in call_cfunc (func=0x18e5f0 <int_dotimes>, recv=3978176, len=0, argc=0, argv=0x0) at eval.c:5781
#21 0x00164a09 in rb_call0 (klass=<value optimized out>, recv=<value optimized out>, id=5753, oid=5753, argc=0, argv=0x0, body=0xb7fe4c5c, flags=<value optimized out>) at eval.c:5928
#22 0x00164baa in rb_call (klass=3086896500, recv=201, mid=5753, argc=0, argv=0x0, scope=0, self=3086911820) at eval.c:6176
#23 0x00161e7b in rb_eval (self=<value optimized out>, n=<value optimized out>) at eval.c:3506
#24 0x0016292e in rb_eval (self=<value optimized out>, n=<value optimized out>) at eval.c:3236
#25 0x00163404 in rb_yield_0 (val=<value optimized out>, self=<value optimized out>, klass=0, flags=<value optimized out>, avalue=2) at eval.c:5095
#26 0x0016374a in rb_thread_yield (arg=3086829920, th=0x8087658) at eval.c:12553
#27 0x0016c2f9 in rb_thread_start_0 (fn=<value optimized out>, arg=<value optimized out>, th=0x8087658) at eval.c:12471
#28 0x00159ade in call_cfunc (func=0x16c420 <rb_thread_initialize>, recv=3978176, len=-2, argc=0, argv=0x0) at eval.c:5775
#29 0x00164a09 in rb_call0 (klass=<value optimized out>, recv=<value optimized out>, id=2961, oid=2961, argc=0, argv=0x0, body=0xb7fe59b8, flags=<value optimized out>) at eval.c:5928
#30 0x00164baa in rb_call (klass=3086899740, recv=3086829940, mid=2961, argc=0, argv=0x0, scope=1, self=6) at eval.c:6176
#31 0x00165459 in rb_funcall2 (recv=3978176, mid=2961, argc=0, argv=0x0) at eval.c:6312
#32 0x001654f7 in rb_obj_call_init (obj=3086829940, argc=0, argv=0x0) at eval.c:7825
#33 0x00165552 in rb_thread_s_new (argc=0, argv=0x0, klass=3086899740) at eval.c:12584
#34 0x00159ab8 in call_cfunc (func=0x165510 <rb_thread_s_new>, recv=3978176, len=-1, argc=0, argv=0x0) at eval.c:5778
#35 0x00164a09 in rb_call0 (klass=<value optimized out>, recv=<value optimized out>, id=3361, oid=3361, argc=0, argv=0x0, body=0xb7fe59e0, flags=<value optimized out>) at eval.c:5928
#36 0x00164baa in rb_call (klass=3086899720, recv=3086899740, mid=3361, argc=0, argv=0x0, scope=0, self=3086911820) at eval.c:6176
#37 0x00161e7b in rb_eval (self=<value optimized out>, n=<value optimized out>) at eval.c:3506
#38 0x0016292e in rb_eval (self=<value optimized out>, n=<value optimized out>) at eval.c:3236
#39 0x0015f659 in rb_eval (self=<value optimized out>, n=<value optimized out>) at eval.c:3501
#40 0x00170d66 in ruby_exec_internal () at eval.c:1654
#41 0x00170db2 in ruby_exec () at eval.c:1674
#42 0x00170df5 in ruby_run () at eval.c:1684
#43 0x0804869d in main (argc=2, argv=0xbfffed24, envp=0xbfffed30) at main.c:48

----------------------------------------
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/show/4339

----------------------------------------
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org

In This Thread