From: "Jonas Pfenniger (zimbatm)" Date: 2011-01-13T05:51:26+09:00 Subject: [ruby-core:34447] Re: Any plans for Rite and Ruby 2.0 ? Hi matz, I understand that Rite is a new code-base, but it will inherit aspects or ruby isn't it ? It will be a ruby-lite (like mirah), with the restrictions of low-end devices. Do you think you are allowed to share the plans/discussion, or is this also disclosed by the government contract ? I'm asking these questions, because CRuby can probably benefit from the work, so if there is anything you're allowed to share, I'd be delighted to listen. Cheers, zimbatm 2011/1/10 Yukihiro Matsumoto : > Hi, > > Rite and CRuby (1.9/2.0) are completely different projects. ��And due > to the restriction of government funded public project, we cannot > disclose the RiteVM source code until the project finished. ��It's a > bit bureaucratic and not open-source-ish, but I cannot help it. > Sorry. > > �� �� �� �� �� �� �� �� �� �� �� �� �� �� �� �� �� �� �� �� �� �� �� �� �� �� �� ��matz. > > In message "Re: [ruby-core:34270] Any plans for Rite and Ruby 2.0 ?" > �� ��on Sun, 9 Jan 2011 22:12:56 +0900, "Jonas Pfenniger (zimbatm)" writes: > | > |Hi Matz, > | > |I just watched your Keynote from Rubyconf 2010, which is great by the > |way. In it, you talk about the Governement-sponsored work you are > |going to do, which you call Rite. I was wondering if the development > |is going to happen in private, or if you have any plans you are going > |to make public before release ? Is the development going to benefit > |the current MRI, for example in terms of cleaning the language from > |it's irregularities, or syntax simplification. I think it would be > |great if Ruby 2.0 could be influenced by the work you are going to do > |on Rite, and reversely, so as to minimize divergences. > | > |Sorry if I am asking too much questions. I have been using Ruby for 6 > |years now, and I decided it's time I contribute back to this wonderful > |language. There is so much things I would like to do.. I'm too late in > |the game, which is why I might sound a bit too pressing :) > | > |/----\ Cheers ! > | \ ��/ > | ��\/ > | > >