From: "NARUSE, Yui" Date: 2011-01-21T04:06:45+09:00 Subject: [ruby-core:34678] Re: [Ruby 1.8-Feature#4239] Let's begin a talk for "1.8.8" -- How's needed for surviving 1.8? (2011/01/21 0:53), Zeno Davatz wrote: > PS: I by far prefer the word consistency to the word compatibility. > The user of Ruby should experience a consistency when he _upgrades_ to > a newer Ruby Version. The user should not fall into the crevasse with every upgrade. Ah, I understand what you say. The word "consistency" confused me... If you used "compatibility", I could understand your intention much sooner. -- NARUSE, Yui