[#34030] Hash#select and Hash#reject bug in 1.9.2? — Lin Jen-Shin <godfat@...>
(sorry if this is a duplicated post, i forgot to subscribe)
[#34033] The rights of ruby-core people and Myth of ruby-dev — "NARUSE, Yui" <naruse@...>
Some of you may don't know your rights.
On 04/01/11 at 06:55 +0900, NARUSE, Yui wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 06:55:47AM +0900, NARUSE, Yui wrote:
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 1:57 PM, Aaron Patterson
(2011/01/05 3:57), Aaron Patterson wrote:
On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 01:01:48PM +0900, Urabe Shyouhei wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 6:52 PM, Shota Fukumori (sora_h)
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 4:37 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter
[#34034] Exception#to_s and non-String Messages — Run Paint Run Run <runrun@...>
I don't know when Redmine will be back up, so:
[#34035] Warn when File.expand_path Ignores its Second Argument? — Run Paint Run Run <runrun@...>
File.expand_path(filename, directory) resolves _filename_ relative to
[#34043] proposal: gem_prelude needs to die — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>
I think it is time for gem_prelude to die.
2011/1/4 Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@zenspider.com>:
2011/1/5 Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@zenspider.com>:
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 1:13 AM, Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@zenspider.com> wrote:
FYI. JRuby 1.6RC1 is going to be shipping with RubyGems 1.4.1 and
2011/1/10 Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@zenspider.com>:
> I'd like to drop gem_prelude down to 'require "rubygems"'. If you want, we can profile this against normal and pathological gem setups first.
[#34062] Ruby 1.9* syscall() on 64 bit systems — Niklas Hofer <niklas@...>
Hi,
[#34091] Moving to Git? — Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@...>
Hi,
> Hi,
Hello,
Em 05-01-2011 13:15, U.Nakamura escreveu:
(2011/01/06 0:46), Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas wrote:
> > Well, I guess I can help listing some advantages. Using git:
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 11:28, Jon <jon.forums@gmail.com> wrote:
Em 05-01-2011 17:16, mathew escreveu:
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 13:23, Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas
On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 06:50:24AM +0900, mathew wrote:
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 17:02, Czarek <cezary.baginski@gmail.com> wrote:
On 07/01/11 at 01:05 +0900, mathew wrote:
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 10:36, Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@lucas-nussbaum.net> wrote:
On 07/01/11 at 08:07 +0900, mathew wrote:
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 23:50, Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@lucas-nussbaum.net> wrote:
Dear all,
Hi,
On 08/01/11 at 05:13 +0900, Ryan Davis wrote:
Hi,
What kind of Redmine integration you are talking about? We use Redmine
Hi,
Hi,
On 06-01-2011 04:06, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 19:57, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
Hi,
[#34124] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4235][Open] svn keywords in code prevent correct building of ruby using git mirror — Stephen Bannasch <redmine@...>
Bug #4235: svn keywords in code prevent correct building of ruby using git mirror
[#34150] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4237][Open] SSL_shutdown should be called until it returns 0 — Aaron Patterson <redmine@...>
Bug #4237: SSL_shutdown should be called until it returns 0
[#34171] [Ruby 1.8-Feature#4239][Open] Let's begin a talk for "1.8.8" -- How's needed for surviving 1.8? — Shota Fukumori <redmine@...>
Feature #4239: Let's begin a talk for "1.8.8" -- How's needed for surviving 1.8?
Issue #4239 has been updated by Zeno Davatz.
Issue #4239 has been updated by Zeno Davatz.
Issue #4239 has been updated by Zeno Davatz.
(2011/01/16 0:11), Zeno Davatz wrote:
On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 1:05 PM, NARUSE, Yui <naruse@airemix.jp> wrote:
(2011/01/17 1:49), Rick DeNatale wrote:
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 12:19 PM, NARUSE, Yui <naruse@airemix.jp> wrote:
Issue #4239 has been updated by Zeno Davatz.
Issue #4239 has been updated by Zeno Davatz.
Hi,
[#34172] [Backport92-Backport#4240][Open] segment fault on ruby on rails project — 건하 박 <redmine@...>
Backport #4240: segment fault on ruby on rails project
[#34177] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4241][Open] IMAPTest#test_imaps_verify_none does not stop — Kazuhiro NISHIYAMA <redmine@...>
Bug #4241: IMAPTest#test_imaps_verify_none does not stop
[#34179] Why is not git mirror mentioned in ruby downloads section? — Michal Suchanek <hramrach@...>
Hello,
On 2011-01-06 , at 07:08, Michal Suchanek wrote:
[#34214] [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4247][Open] New features for Array#sample, Array#choice — Yoji Ojima <redmine@...>
Feature #4247: New features for Array#sample, Array#choice
Hi,
On Fri, Jan 07, 2011 at 08:08:03PM +0900, Yusuke ENDOH wrote:
On 7 January 2011 18:14, Aaron Patterson <aaron@tenderlovemaking.com> wrote:
[#34244] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4251][Open] Segmentation fault when using ruby-prof and Ruby 1.9.2 — Evan Chaney <redmine@...>
Bug #4251: Segmentation fault when using ruby-prof and Ruby 1.9.2
[#34267] [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4254][Open] Allow method transplanting — Jonas Pfenniger <redmine@...>
Feature #4254: Allow method transplanting
Wouldn't that be unnecessary if matz' trait proposal would be implemented?
2011/1/9 Haase, Konstantin <Konstantin.Haase@student.hpi.uni-potsdam.de>:
Hi,
Hi,
[#34270] Any plans for Rite and Ruby 2.0 ? — "Jonas Pfenniger (zimbatm)" <jonas@...>
Hi Matz,
[#34297] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4255][Open] When on a case-insensitive filesystem, "loaded features" search in require should ignore case — Charles Nutter <redmine@...>
Bug #4255: When on a case-insensitive filesystem, "loaded features" search in require should ignore case
Issue #4255 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.
[#34318] ext/bigdecimal/lib/bigdecimal/util.rb — Aaron Patterson <aaron@...>
Hi Murata!
Hi,
Hi Aaron and Matz,
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 01:23:47PM +0900, Kenta Murata wrote:
[#34354] [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4264][Open] General type coercion protocol for Ruby — Charles Nutter <redmine@...>
Feature #4264: General type coercion protocol for Ruby
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 10:27 AM, Jim Weirich <jim.weirich@gmail.com> wrote:
On Jan 11, 2011, at 11:14 AM, Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 7:18 PM, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
Issue #4264 has been updated by Charles Nutter.
On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 10:26, Charles Nutter <redmine@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
On 19-01-2011 08:05, mathew wrote:
Issue #4264 has been updated by Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas.
Both #as (Parslet, Sequel, MetaWhere, hacketyhack, Facets, Ruport, CouchPotato, ...) and #to (RSpec, Ramaze, ActiveSupport) are use in DSLs.
[#34355] [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4265][Open] Provide a core method Kernel#ruby for invoking a new Ruby instance — Charles Nutter <redmine@...>
Feature #4265: Provide a core method Kernel#ruby for invoking a new Ruby instance
> Feature #4265: Provide a core method Kernel#ruby for invoking a new Ruby instance
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 9:07 AM, Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@gmail.com> wrote:
[#34416] ext/openssl development repository — Hiroshi Nakamura <nakahiro@...>
Hi, committers,
[#34483] Windows sockets and CRT fds — ghazel@...
Hi,
Hello,
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 8:03 PM, U.Nakamura <usa@garbagecollect.jp> wrote:
Hello,
[#34504] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4282][Open] Range#map inconsistency with blocks like {...} and do...end — Andrei Kulakov <redmine@...>
Bug #4282: Range#map inconsistency with blocks like {...} and do...end
[#34534] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4283][Open] Timeout.timeout may cause application exit unintetionally — Motohiro KOSAKI <redmine@...>
Bug #4283: Timeout.timeout may cause application exit unintetionally
Issue #4283 has been updated by Charles Nutter.
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 10:00 PM, Yusuke ENDOH <mame@tsg.ne.jp> wrote:
Hi,
[#34537] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4285][Open] Ruby don't have asynchrounous exception safe syntax and It should have. — Motohiro KOSAKI <redmine@...>
Bug #4285: Ruby don't have asynchrounous exception safe syntax and It should have.
Issue #4285 has been updated by Motohiro KOSAKI.
Hi,
Issue #4285 has been updated by Charles Nutter.
[#34550] [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4288][Open] Allow invoking arbitrary method names with foo."something" syntax — Charles Nutter <redmine@...>
Feature #4288: Allow invoking arbitrary method names with foo."something" syntax
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 2:58 PM, Gary Wright <gwtmp01@mac.com> wrote:
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 6:03 PM, Gary Wright <gwtmp01@mac.com> wrote:
> It does, but my concern with it is that (in the same way as
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 12:51 AM, Charles Nutter <redmine@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#34553] Feature request - Low level bitwise operations on char arrays (or class String) — Martin Asser Hansen <mail@...>
Hello ruby-core,
Hi,
I think that the special cases of Hamming and Levensthein distances are,
What about String#bytes returning a new built-in ByteArray type
[#34558] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4291][Open] rb_time_new with negative values (pre-epoch dates) on Windows — Kyle Banker <redmine@...>
Bug #4291: rb_time_new with negative values (pre-epoch dates) on Windows
[#34568] [PATCH] Add thread timing to Struct::Tms — Evan Phoenix <evan@...>
Because 1.9 now uses real threads, being able to find out how much time the current thread is using is quite useful, especially for benchmarking.
[#34577] Importing rubygems 1.5.0 (release candidate) into trunk. — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>
I'm going to be committing rubygems 1.5.0 into trunk in a bit.
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 11:22 PM, NARUSE, Yui <naruse@airemix.jp> wrote:
Hello,
[#34593] Autoload treatment of absolute paths in $LOAD_PATH containing . or .. — David Yip <yipdw@...>
Hello all,
[#34610] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4294][Open] IO.popen ['"ping"', 'localhost -n 3'] fails — red stun <redmine@...>
Bug #4294: IO.popen ['"ping"', 'localhost -n 3'] fails
[#34632] Ruby operator equivalent to Groovy's "?." — Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@...>
One of the few things I like in Groovy that Ruby doesn't support is
I have definitely had cases where such a feature would have been very
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 1:27 AM, Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas
Em 20-01-2011 05:35, Giuseppe Bilotta escreveu:
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 6:27 PM, Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 7:01 PM, Jim Weirich <jim.weirich@gmail.com> wrote:
[#34634] Returning from the callee — Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@...>
Sometimes it is useful to be able to return from the callee method.
2011/1/20 Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@gmail.com>:
Em 20-01-2011 07:59, Jonas Pfenniger (zimbatm) escreveu:
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 19:27, Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas
Em 20-01-2011 18:51, Nikolai Weibull escreveu:
[#34648] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4298][Open] Duration of calling String#[] with the same index is strangely related to string length. — Radosław Bułat <redmine@...>
Bug #4298: Duration of calling String#[] with the same index is strangely related to string length.
[#34659] MRI file architecture doc — "Jonas Pfenniger (zimbatm)" <jonas@...>
Hi ruby folks,
[#34679] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4300][Open] Merge keys not working as expected in psych yaml parser — Matthew Conway <redmine@...>
Bug #4300: Merge keys not working as expected in psych yaml parser
[#34690] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4301][Open] Off-by-one line number in Psych parse error — Charles Nutter <redmine@...>
Bug #4301: Off-by-one line number in Psych parse error
[#34739] Redmine spam — "Jonas Pfenniger (zimbatm)" <jonas@...>
I really hate spammers, is it something we can do to prevent them
2011/1/21 Jonas Pfenniger (zimbatm) <jonas@pfenniger.name>:
[#34752] Is evaluation order of arguments specified? — Nikolai Weibull <now@...>
Is the evaluation order of arguments specified? I couldn’t find
[#34832] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4314][Open] spwn cause Segmantation Fault if take a long string. — Motohiro KOSAKI <redmine@...>
Bug #4314: spwn cause Segmantation Fault if take a long string.
[#34861] [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4326][Open] Fiber should respond to call() and [] — Aaron Patterson <redmine@...>
Feature #4326: Fiber should respond to call() and []
Issue #4326 has been updated by Charles Nutter.
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 02:58:46AM +0900, Charles Nutter wrote:
On Fri, Jan 28, 2011 at 5:29 PM, Aaron Patterson
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 09:45:30AM +0900, Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
Hi,
[#34869] make ruby support line continuations ? — Marc Chantreux <khatar@...>
hello,
You can escape line endings with backslash:
> I love it so much i tried it in ruby. trying to rewrite:
hello,
Dne 27.1.2011 7:15, Marc Chantreux napsal(a):
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 04:16:50PM +0900, V咜 Ondruch wrote:
[#34888] [Ruby 1.9-Feature#4328][Open] export rb_thread_call_with_gvl() — Eric Wong <redmine@...>
Feature #4328: export rb_thread_call_with_gvl()
Hi,
SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
[#34911] The ruby-lang.org downloads page should include RVM for OS X — Andrew Vos <andrew.vos@...>
(I sent this before I subscribed and I'm not sure if it bounced. Sorry if
RVM is not official, and makes problem more difficult. (magically
What do you mean by "official"? Also, what does it make more difficult? Do
return mail is gmail thing. I have same problem.
On Jan 27, 2011, at 5:54 PM, Shota Fukumori (sora_h) wrote:
Hi,
On Jan 27, 2011, at 7:49 PM, Shota Fukumori (sora_h) wrote:
On Fri Jan 28 2011 @ 10:57, James Edward Gray II wrote:
On Jan 27, 2011, at 8:04 PM, Peter Aronoff wrote:
[#34938] Setting libpath for AIX — Perry Smith <pedzsan@...>
Hi,
[#34959] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4340][Open] Encoding of result string for String#gsub is not consistent — Eric Hodel <redmine@...>
Bug #4340: Encoding of result string for String#gsub is not consistent
Issue #4340 has been updated by Yui NARUSE.
Can I ask why regexps are not affected by
[#34970] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4343][Open] Dir.glob does match files without extension — Vit Ondruch <redmine@...>
Bug #4343: Dir.glob does match files without extension
Issue #4343 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.
On 01/29/2011 10:19 AM, Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:
Dne 29.1.2011 17:27, Jeremy Bopp napsal(a):
On 01/29/2011 10:33 AM, Vテュt Ondruch wrote:
Dne 29.1.2011 17:53, Jeremy Bopp napsal(a):
On 01/29/2011 11:09 AM, V鱈t Ondruch wrote:
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 11:49, Jeremy Bopp <jeremy@bopp.net> wrote:
On 01/30/2011 06:30 PM, mathew wrote:
On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 23:07, Jeremy Bopp <jeremy@bopp.net> wrote:
On 02/03/2011 09:38 PM, mathew wrote:
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 22:29, Jeremy Bopp <jeremy@bopp.net> wrote:
[#34991] Understanding realpath_rec behavior — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...>
Hello,
On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 03:01, Luis Lavena <luislavena@gmail.com> wrote:
[#35001] file_expand_path performing unneeded IO operations on native Windows — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...>
Hello,
Hello,
On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 9:39 PM, U.Nakamura <usa@garbagecollect.jp> wrote:
[#35010] Question: Windows versions - supported and deprecated platforms. — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...>
Hello,
Hello,
[ruby-core:34439] [Ruby 1.9-Bug#4272] rb_enc_str_new() causes segmentfault when using threads in parallel
Issue #4272 has been updated by I単aki Baz Castillo.
File test_bug2.rb added
Yukihiro:
> I could not reproduce your problem
Do you mean under Ruby 1.9.2 64 bits? If so please use a bigger argument (ruby test_bug.rb 100000). I've realized that depending on the machine it crashes sooner or later.
> but your script allocates thousands of threads by default. Each thread consumes at least 1M of memory, so
> that allocating thousands of threads could cause memory starvation, which may be the source of your problem.
The segmentfault just occurs when using rb_enc_str_new(). If you edit test_bug.rb and remove/comment the first iteration with "tester.test_rb_str_new" the segmentfault also occurs. And it never occurs if you just leave the iteration with "tester.test_rb_str_new".
And more important, I also reproduce *always* the segmentfault using a fixed pool of 20 threads (in EventMachine). And also in this modified test script (max 20 threads are created) you can run by loading my attached C extension (I attach now test_bug2.rb with this code):
require "./test_encoding"
times = ( ( ARGV[0] and ARGV[0].to_i > 0 ) ? ARGV[0].to_i : 5000 )
threads = []
num_threads = 20
tester = TestEncoding::Tester.new
times.times do |num|
puts "iteration [#{num}]"
str = tester.test_rb_enc_str_new
threads << Thread.new { } unless num_threads == 0
num_threads -= 1
end
Using Ruby 1.9.2-<any> produces different segmentfault (randomly, but it crashes always in my machines):
1) Crash on Thread.initialize:
iteration [1981]
iteration [1982]
iteration [1983]
iteration [1984]
test_bug.rb:12: [BUG] Segmentation fault
ruby 1.9.2p0 (2010-08-18 revision 29036) [x86_64-linux]
-- control frame ----------
c:0008 p:---- s:0025 b:0025 l:000024 d:000024 CFUNC :initialize
c:0007 p:---- s:0023 b:0023 l:000022 d:000022 CFUNC :new
c:0006 p:0063 s:0020 b:0019 l:001f08 d:000018 BLOCK test_bug.rb:12
c:0005 p:---- s:0015 b:0015 l:000014 d:000014 FINISH
c:0004 p:---- s:0013 b:0013 l:000012 d:000012 CFUNC :times
c:0003 p:0121 s:0010 b:0010 l:001f08 d:000968 EVAL test_bug.rb:9
c:0002 p:---- s:0004 b:0004 l:000003 d:000003 FINISH
c:0001 p:0000 s:0002 b:0002 l:001f08 d:001f08 TOP
---------------------------
-- Ruby level backtrace information ----------------------------------------
test_bug.rb:9:in `<main>'
test_bug.rb:9:in `times'
test_bug.rb:12:in `block in <main>'
test_bug.rb:12:in `new'
test_bug.rb:12:in `initialize'
-- C level backtrace information -------------------------------------------
/usr/lib/libruby-1.9.1.so.1.9(rb_vm_bugreport+0x5f) [0x7f10c71c658f]
/usr/lib/libruby-1.9.1.so.1.9(+0x5a7be) [0x7f10c70cd7be]
/usr/lib/libruby-1.9.1.so.1.9(rb_bug+0xa6) [0x7f10c70ce136]
/usr/lib/libruby-1.9.1.so.1.9(+0xf4a75) [0x7f10c7167a75]
/lib/libpthread.so.0(+0xfb40) [0x7f10c6e65b40]
/usr/lib/libruby-1.9.1.so.1.9(+0x6edc8) [0x7f10c70e1dc8]
/usr/lib/libruby-1.9.1.so.1.9(rb_thread_mark+0x4c) [0x7f10c71b1b8c]
/usr/lib/libruby-1.9.1.so.1.9(+0x6e87a) [0x7f10c70e187a]
/usr/lib/libruby-1.9.1.so.1.9(+0x13ea89) [0x7f10c71b1a89]
/usr/lib/libruby-1.9.1.so.1.9(st_foreach+0xb4) [0x7f10c7170284]
/usr/lib/libruby-1.9.1.so.1.9(rb_vm_mark+0x29) [0x7f10c71b1f09]
/usr/lib/libruby-1.9.1.so.1.9(+0x6e87a) [0x7f10c70e187a]
/usr/lib/libruby-1.9.1.so.1.9(+0x6fd98) [0x7f10c70e2d98]
/usr/lib/libruby-1.9.1.so.1.9(rb_newobj+0x47) [0x7f10c70e37c7]
/usr/lib/libruby-1.9.1.so.1.9(rb_data_typed_object_alloc+0x26) [0x7f10c70e3886]
/usr/lib/libruby-1.9.1.so.1.9(+0x13f97a) [0x7f10c71b297a]
/usr/lib/libruby-1.9.1.so.1.9(rb_vm_make_proc+0x56) [0x7f10c71b44e6]
/usr/lib/libruby-1.9.1.so.1.9(+0x64be3) [0x7f10c70d7be3]
/usr/lib/libruby-1.9.1.so.1.9(+0x154a92) [0x7f10c71c7a92]
/usr/lib/libruby-1.9.1.so.1.9(+0x149ca5) [0x7f10c71bcca5]
/usr/lib/libruby-1.9.1.so.1.9(+0x154cc8) [0x7f10c71c7cc8]
/usr/lib/libruby-1.9.1.so.1.9(+0x14c93e) [0x7f10c71bf93e]
/usr/lib/libruby-1.9.1.so.1.9(+0x143f61) [0x7f10c71b6f61]
/usr/lib/libruby-1.9.1.so.1.9(+0x148b44) [0x7f10c71bbb44]
/usr/lib/libruby-1.9.1.so.1.9(rb_yield+0x238) [0x7f10c71c2408]
/usr/lib/libruby-1.9.1.so.1.9(+0x96571) [0x7f10c7109571]
/usr/lib/libruby-1.9.1.so.1.9(+0x14c93e) [0x7f10c71bf93e]
/usr/lib/libruby-1.9.1.so.1.9(+0x143f61) [0x7f10c71b6f61]
/usr/lib/libruby-1.9.1.so.1.9(+0x148b44) [0x7f10c71bbb44]
/usr/lib/libruby-1.9.1.so.1.9(rb_iseq_eval_main+0xb1) [0x7f10c71c2c81]
/usr/lib/libruby-1.9.1.so.1.9(+0x5ecca) [0x7f10c70d1cca]
/usr/lib/libruby-1.9.1.so.1.9(ruby_exec_node+0x1d) [0x7f10c70d22ed]
/usr/lib/libruby-1.9.1.so.1.9(ruby_run_node+0x1e) [0x7f10c70d3e3e]
ruby(main+0x4b) [0x40092b]
/lib/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xfe) [0x7f10c6229d8e]
ruby() [0x400819]
2) Crash on Thread#new:
iteration [1780]
iteration [1781]
iteration [1782]
iteration [1783]
test_bug.rb:12: [BUG] Segmentation fault
ruby 1.9.2p0 (2010-08-18 revision 29036) [x86_64-linux]
-- control frame ----------
c:0007 p:---- s:0023 b:0023 l:000022 d:000022 CFUNC :new
c:0006 p:0063 s:0020 b:0019 l:000048 d:000018 BLOCK test_bug.rb:12
c:0005 p:---- s:0015 b:0015 l:000014 d:000014 FINISH
c:0004 p:---- s:0013 b:0013 l:000012 d:000012 CFUNC :times
c:0003 p:0121 s:0010 b:0010 l:000048 d:0011b8 EVAL test_bug.rb:9
c:0002 p:---- s:0004 b:0004 l:000003 d:000003 FINISH
c:0001 p:0000 s:0002 b:0002 l:000048 d:000048 TOP
---------------------------
-- Ruby level backtrace information ----------------------------------------
test_bug.rb:9:in `<main>'
test_bug.rb:9:in `times'
test_bug.rb:12:in `block in <main>'
test_bug.rb:12:in `new'
-- C level backtrace information -------------------------------------------
/usr/lib/libruby-1.9.1.so.1.9(rb_vm_bugreport+0x5f) [0x7f53d34ec58f]
/usr/lib/libruby-1.9.1.so.1.9(+0x5a7be) [0x7f53d33f37be]
/usr/lib/libruby-1.9.1.so.1.9(rb_bug+0xa6) [0x7f53d33f4136]
/usr/lib/libruby-1.9.1.so.1.9(+0xf4a75) [0x7f53d348da75]
/lib/libpthread.so.0(+0xfb40) [0x7f53d318bb40]
/usr/lib/libruby-1.9.1.so.1.9(+0x6edc8) [0x7f53d3407dc8]
/usr/lib/libruby-1.9.1.so.1.9(rb_thread_mark+0x4c) [0x7f53d34d7b8c]
/usr/lib/libruby-1.9.1.so.1.9(+0x6e87a) [0x7f53d340787a]
/usr/lib/libruby-1.9.1.so.1.9(+0x13ea89) [0x7f53d34d7a89]
/usr/lib/libruby-1.9.1.so.1.9(st_foreach+0xb4) [0x7f53d3496284]
/usr/lib/libruby-1.9.1.so.1.9(rb_vm_mark+0x29) [0x7f53d34d7f09]
/usr/lib/libruby-1.9.1.so.1.9(+0x6e87a) [0x7f53d340787a]
/usr/lib/libruby-1.9.1.so.1.9(+0x6fd98) [0x7f53d3408d98]
/usr/lib/libruby-1.9.1.so.1.9(+0x70b4c) [0x7f53d3409b4c]
/usr/lib/libruby-1.9.1.so.1.9(+0x1403af) [0x7f53d34d93af]
/usr/lib/libruby-1.9.1.so.1.9(rb_thread_alloc+0x66) [0x7f53d34e9286]
/usr/lib/libruby-1.9.1.so.1.9(+0x154cb8) [0x7f53d34edcb8]
/usr/lib/libruby-1.9.1.so.1.9(+0x14c93e) [0x7f53d34e593e]
/usr/lib/libruby-1.9.1.so.1.9(+0x143f61) [0x7f53d34dcf61]
/usr/lib/libruby-1.9.1.so.1.9(+0x148b44) [0x7f53d34e1b44]
/usr/lib/libruby-1.9.1.so.1.9(rb_yield+0x238) [0x7f53d34e8408]
/usr/lib/libruby-1.9.1.so.1.9(+0x96571) [0x7f53d342f571]
/usr/lib/libruby-1.9.1.so.1.9(+0x14c93e) [0x7f53d34e593e]
/usr/lib/libruby-1.9.1.so.1.9(+0x143f61) [0x7f53d34dcf61]
/usr/lib/libruby-1.9.1.so.1.9(+0x148b44) [0x7f53d34e1b44]
/usr/lib/libruby-1.9.1.so.1.9(rb_iseq_eval_main+0xb1) [0x7f53d34e8c81]
/usr/lib/libruby-1.9.1.so.1.9(+0x5ecca) [0x7f53d33f7cca]
/usr/lib/libruby-1.9.1.so.1.9(ruby_exec_node+0x1d) [0x7f53d33f82ed]
/usr/lib/libruby-1.9.1.so.1.9(ruby_run_node+0x1e) [0x7f53d33f9e3e]
ruby(main+0x4b) [0x40092b]
/lib/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xfe) [0x7f53d254fd8e]
ruby() [0x400819]
3) Sometimes it crashes on "times.times do".
However as I said, in same machine using Ruby 1.9.1 it doesn't crash.
My system data:
- AMD Phenom(tm) II X4 965 Processor
- Ubuntu 10.10 64 bits
- gcc-4.4
- Ruby 1.9.2-p0, 1.9.2-p136, and snapshot version (2011-01-12)
- 4GB RAM
----------------------------------------
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/show/4272
----------------------------------------
http://redmine.ruby-lang.org