[#72745] [Ruby trunk - Misc #11876] [Closed] Scheduled maintenance 2016/01/01 — shibata.hiroshi@...
Issue #11876 has been updated by Hiroshi SHIBATA.
shibata.hiroshi@gmail.com wrote:
[#72824] [Ruby trunk - Bug #11973] IO#advise should raise NotImplementedError on platforms that do not support that call — git@...
Issue #11973 has been updated by Chuck Remes.
[#72954] [Ruby trunk - Feature #12010] [Assigned] Exclude dot and dotdot from Dir#each — naruse@...
Issue #12010 has been reported by Yui NARUSE.
naruse@airemix.jp wrote:
[#73313] [Ruby trunk - Bug #12007] [Open] Newly added Unicode data file doesn't get downloaded — shugo@...
Issue #12007 has been updated by Shugo Maeda.
[#73372] [Ruby trunk - Misc #12004] Code of Conduct — benton@...
Issue #12004 has been updated by Benton Barnett.
On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 5:13 PM, <benton@bentonbarnett.com> wrote:
[#73421] [Ruby trunk - Misc #12004] Code of Conduct — nekocat432@...
Issue #12004 has been updated by Ruby Dino.
I’m sorry, but this, like the code of merit, is merely a derailing tactic.
On 2016/01/26 01:32, Austin Ziegler wrote:
On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 12:25 AM, Martin J. Dürst <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
[#73491] [Ruby trunk - Misc #12004] Code of Conduct — git@...
Issue #12004 has been updated by Chuck Remes.
They will never provide any numbers because they are not engineers and they
Coraline is a panelist on Ruby rogues and a very well respected member of
OK, sorry for previous comment. Let's try this way.
On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 5:15 PM, Andrew Kirilenko <
[#73558] [Ruby trunk - Misc #12004] Code of Conduct — andrew.kirilenko@...
Issue #12004 has been updated by Andrew Kirilenko.
Andrew, please stop digging. Your hole is only getting deeper.
>Andrew, please stop digging. Your hole is only getting deeper.
[#73586] [Ruby trunk - Misc #12004] Code of Conduct — andrew@...
Issue #12004 has been updated by Andrew Vit.
[#73593] [Ruby trunk - Bug #12034] RegExp does not respect file encoding directive — nobu@...
Issue #12034 has been updated by Nobuyoshi Nakada.
[ruby-core:72887] [Ruby trunk - Bug #7676] Comparison of Float::NAN in array behaves unexpectedly
Issue #7676 has been updated by Dwain Faithfull. It appears calling eql? on array does not behave in this way: ~~~ [Float::NAN].eql? [Float::NAN] => false ~~~ Should we aim for consistency between these methods? Does it make sense for one to have an identity check and for the other not to? I believe it doesn't really make sense for == to have an identity check, as the example in #3 is not how I'd expect Ruby to behave. ---------------------------------------- Bug #7676: Comparison of Float::NAN in array behaves unexpectedly https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/7676#change-56120 * Author: Simon Russell * Status: Open * Priority: Normal * Assignee: Yukihiro Matsumoto * ruby -v: ruby 1.9.3p362 (2012-12-25 revision 38607) [x86_64-linux] * Backport: ---------------------------------------- It seems that two arrays containing Float::NAN will be considered equal ([Float::NAN] == [Float::NAN]), despite the fact that Float::NAN != Float::NAN. Tested and reproduced in 1.8.7p371, 1.9.3p362, 2.0.0preview2. (This bug can be reproduced in Ruby 1.8 as well.) Results below. 1.8.7 p371 --------- 1.8.7 :001 > nan = 0.0/0.0 => NaN 1.8.7 :002 > nan == nan => false 1.8.7 :003 > [nan] == [nan] => true 1.9.3 p362 --------- 1.9.3p362 :001 > Float::NAN == Float::NAN => false 1.9.3p362 :002 > [Float::NAN] == [Float::NAN] => true 2.0.0 preview2 -------------- 2.0.0dev :001 > Float::NAN == Float::NAN => false 2.0.0dev :002 > [Float::NAN] == [Float::NAN] => true ---Files-------------------------------- bug-7676.patch (1.67 KB) -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/ Unsubscribe: <mailto:ruby-core-request@ruby-lang.org?subject=unsubscribe> <http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>