[#35036] Intentional Programming — "John" <nojgoalbyspam@...>

Hi all

17 messages 2002/03/01

[#35112] RDoc question — Michael Davis <mdavis@...>

I have a question about RDoc. I would like to reference an external

17 messages 2002/03/02

[#35162] string to array and back — Ron Jeffries <ronjeffries@...>

I am needing to convert strings to arrays of bytes and back. I see pack and

19 messages 2002/03/03

[#35364] file reading impossibly slow? — Ron Jeffries <ronjeffries@...>

So I'm doing this benchmark to work with my set program. Part of the problem is

18 messages 2002/03/07

[#35429] Interesting link on static/dynamic typing... — Robert Feldt <feldt@...>

...relevant to Ruby compared to other languages discussion:

25 messages 2002/03/08
[#35441] Re: Interesting link on static/dynamic typing... — Paul Brannan <paul@...> 2002/03/08

On Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 05:34:43PM +0900, Robert Feldt wrote:

[#35460] Spam, ruby-talk, and me — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

14 messages 2002/03/08

[#35537] Confusion — David Corbin <dcorbin@...>

The following is from my debugging through xmlc.rb

16 messages 2002/03/10

[#35579] RE: WIN32OLE and LDAP — "Morris, Chris" <chris.morris@...>

> The new version 0.4.2 of Win32OLE has WIN32OLE.bind method.

16 messages 2002/03/11

[#35652] Method type 'abstract' — Peter Hickman <peter@...>

The one thing I miss in Ruby is the abstract class method to go along

15 messages 2002/03/12

[#35653] Some potential RCRs — "Bob Alexander" <bobalex@...>

Here are a few thing I am considering submitting as RCRs. I'm looking for comments to help decide whether to make them official, so please let know what you think is good and bad about these...

50 messages 2002/03/12
[#35672] Re: Some potential RCRs — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2002/03/12

Hi,

[#35683] Re: Some potential RCRs — Massimiliano Mirra <list@...> 2002/03/12

On Wed, Mar 13, 2002 at 03:58:01AM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#35697] Re: Some potential RCRs — David Alan Black <dblack@...> 2002/03/13

Hello --

[#35694] rpkg 0.3 — Massimiliano Mirra <list@...>

14 messages 2002/03/13
[#35699] RE: [ANN] rpkg 0.3 — <james@...> 2002/03/13

>

[#35787] testunit - setup -> set_up ? — "Morris, Chris" <chris.morris@...>

I'm just starting to use testunit instead of rubyunit ... I noticed with an

21 messages 2002/03/13
[#35793] RE: testunit - setup -> set_up ? — "Nathaniel Talbott" <nathaniel@...> 2002/03/13

Morris, Chris [mailto:chris.morris@snelling.com] wrote:

[#35796] Re: testunit - setup -> set_up ? — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2002/03/13

"Nathaniel Talbott" <nathaniel@talbott.ws> writes:

[#35797] RE: testunit - setup -> set_up ? — "Nathaniel Talbott" <nathaniel@...> 2002/03/13

dave@thomases.com [mailto:dave@thomases.com] wrote:

[#35898] camelCase and underscore_style — "Morris, Chris" <chris.morris@...>

First, a question. If underscore_style is the Ruby norm for methods and the

20 messages 2002/03/15
[#35924] Re: camelCase and underscore_style — "Guy N. Hurst" <gnhurst@...> 2002/03/15

Phil Tomson wrote:

[#35930] RE: camelCase and underscore_style — "Nathaniel Talbott" <nathaniel@...> 2002/03/16

Guy N. Hurst [mailto:gnhurst@hurstlinks.com] wrote:

[#35989] ANN: Locana GUI and GUI Builder version 0.81 — Michael Davis <mdavis@...>

I am pleased to announce release 0.81 of Locana. Locana is a GUI

16 messages 2002/03/16

[#35992] XPath — Michael Schuerig <schuerig@...>

27 messages 2002/03/16

[#36034] Mini Rant: Indenting — Thomas Hurst <tom.hurst@...>

Why is it that I see *so* much code like:

14 messages 2002/03/17

[#36049] web templating for static sites? — Massimiliano Mirra <list@...>

I'm using the Template Toolkit for generating static web sites and I

42 messages 2002/03/17
[#36426] web standars (was: web templating for static sites?) — Tobias Reif <tobiasreif@...> 2002/03/20

Albert Wagner wrote:

[#36052] Xml Serialization for Ruby — "Chris Morris" <chrismo@...>

=Xml Serialization for Ruby

20 messages 2002/03/17
[#36059] Re: [ANN] Xml Serialization for Ruby — Massimiliano Mirra <list@...> 2002/03/17

On Mon, Mar 18, 2002 at 05:20:56AM +0900, Chris Morris wrote:

[#36067] eval/Module question — David Corbin <dcorbin@...>

If I have a String src that is similar to the following:

13 messages 2002/03/18

[#36157] Development of Windows version of Ruby — ptkwt@...1.aracnet.com (Phil Tomson)

Now that we've dumped the cygwin requirement for the Windows version of

63 messages 2002/03/18
[#36330] Re: Development of Windows version of Ruby — Ron Jeffries <ronjeffries@...> 2002/03/19

On Tue, 19 Mar 2002 14:05:27 GMT, "Albert L. Wagner" <alwagner@uark.edu> wrote:

[#36431] Re: Development of Windows version of Ruby — Dennis Newbold <dennisn@...> 2002/03/20

[#36458] Windows version of Ruby (proposals) — ptkwt@... (Phil Tomson) 2002/03/21

Dennis Newbold <dennisn@pe.net> wrote in message news:<Pine.GSO.3.96.1020320113603.22242B-100000@shell2>...

[#36482] RE: Windows version of Ruby (proposals) — "Christian Boos" <cboos@...> 2002/03/21

Some thoughts on the 2 first Windows issues, plus a 4th one...

[#36496] Re: Windows version of Ruby (proposals) — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2002/03/21

"Christian Boos" <cboos@bct-technology.com> writes:

[#36510] Re: Windows version of Ruby (proposals) — nobu.nokada@... 2002/03/21

Hi,

[#36514] Re: Windows version of Ruby (proposals) — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2002/03/21

nobu.nokada@softhome.net writes:

[#36518] Re: Windows version of Ruby (proposals) — nobu.nokada@... 2002/03/21

Hi,

[#36211] dots in Dir.entries — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)

Hi,

22 messages 2002/03/19

[#36231] style choice — Ron Jeffries <ronjeffries@...>

A style question for the community ... which of the following do you prefer, and

18 messages 2002/03/19

[#36345] ANN: REXML 2.0 — Sean Russell <ser@...>

I have a feeling there will only be three major revisions of REXML. Version

19 messages 2002/03/20

[#36610] Re: Windows version of Ruby (proposals) — Ron Jeffries <ronjeffries@...>

On Thu, 21 Mar 2002 14:11:55 GMT, Dave Thomas <Dave@PragmaticProgrammer.com> wrote:

16 messages 2002/03/22

[#36645] Ruby for Mac OS 10.1 — Jim Freeze <jim@...>

Hi:

28 messages 2002/03/23

[#36768] Re: Difference between 'do' and 'begin' — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...>

In <slrna9ulvi.f2h.mwg@fluffy.isd.dp.ua> Wladimir Mutel <mwg@fluffy.isd.dp.ua> writes:

23 messages 2002/03/26
[#36783] RE: Difference between 'do' and 'begin' — <james@...> 2002/03/26

[#36792] Re: Difference between 'do' and 'begin' — Kent Dahl <kentda@...> 2002/03/26

james@rubyxml.com wrote:

[#36808] Error calling Tk in a loop — <james@...>

I'm trying to write some code that pops up a Tk window when for certain

15 messages 2002/03/26

[#36841] RE: Windows version of Ruby (proposals) — "Andres Hidalgo" <sol123@...>

I believe that Ruby has a place in windows (Office), I happened to have

14 messages 2002/03/27

[#36863] Hash.new(Hash.new) doesn't use Hash.new as default value — "Jonas Delfs" <jonas@...>

Hi -

18 messages 2002/03/27

[#37080] Why isn't Math object-oriented? — Bil Kleb <W.L.Kleb@...>

So I'm reading along in the Pixaxe book (yet again), and I am told

15 messages 2002/03/30

[#37121] String#begins?(s) — timsuth@... (Tim Sutherland)

class String

24 messages 2002/03/31

Re: Using FxRuby and Test::Unit.

From: "Lyle Johnson" <ljohnson@...>
Date: 2002-03-26 21:47:50 UTC
List: ruby-talk #36824
> I've been trying to write some code Test First using Test::Unit and FxRuby
> and I'm having some problems.
>
<snip>
>
> Loaded suite FoxProblemDemo
> Started...
> ..FoxProblemDemo.rb:6: [BUG] Segmentation fault
>
> abnormal program termination
> ruby 1.6.6 (2001-12-26) [i586-mswin32]
> >Exit code: 3
>
> The problem doesn't show up until the second test method is added. I'm
> guessing that when set_up is called a second time a second application
> object is create and that this is not allowed in Fox. I tried to get round
> this by re-using the application object but this didn't help. I'm trying
to
> test a FXMainWindow sub-class and I get similar problems when I try to
> instantiate a second instance using the same FXApp object.
>
> Any have any pointers on how to use FXRuby and Test::Unit together would
be
> appreciated.

I'm just starting to look into this myself and so I don't have a "cookbook"
solution yet. But listed below is a test case I wrote for the FXButton class
that may give you some ideas. Note that it doesn't ever call create() to
actually create the server-side resources and display the GUI; it is
strictly testing the client-side data. I'm still not exactly sure how to
unit test GUI components like this, in an automated setting.

Anyways...

Hope this helps,

Lyle

require 'test/unit'

require 'fox'

include Fox

class TC_FXButton < Test::Unit::TestCase
  def set_up
    if FXApp.instance.nil?
      @app = FXApp.new('TC_FXButton', 'FXRuby')
      @app.init([])
      @mainwin = FXMainWindow.new(@app, 'TC_FXButton')
    else
      @app = FXApp.instance
      @mainwin = @app.mainWindow
    end
    @button = FXButton.new(@mainwin, "buttonText")
  end

  def testText
    assert_not_nil(@button.text)
    assert_instance_of(String, @button.text)
    assert_equal("buttonText", @button.text)
    assert_not_equal("googly-moogly", @button.text)
    @button.text = nil
    assert_not_nil(@button.text)
    assert_instance_of(String, @button.text)
  end

  def testStyle
    assert_not_nil(@button.buttonStyle)
    assert_instance_of(Fixnum, @button.buttonStyle)

    @button.buttonStyle |= BUTTON_AUTOGRAY
    assert((@button.buttonStyle & BUTTON_AUTOGRAY) != 0)
    @button.buttonStyle &= ~BUTTON_AUTOGRAY
    assert((@button.buttonStyle & BUTTON_AUTOGRAY) == 0)

    @button.buttonStyle |= BUTTON_AUTOHIDE
    assert((@button.buttonStyle & BUTTON_AUTOHIDE) != 0)
    @button.buttonStyle &= ~BUTTON_AUTOHIDE
    assert((@button.buttonStyle & BUTTON_AUTOHIDE) == 0)

    @button.buttonStyle |= BUTTON_TOOLBAR
    assert((@button.buttonStyle & BUTTON_TOOLBAR) != 0)
    @button.buttonStyle &= ~BUTTON_TOOLBAR
    assert((@button.buttonStyle & BUTTON_TOOLBAR) == 0)

    @button.buttonStyle |= BUTTON_DEFAULT
    assert((@button.buttonStyle & BUTTON_DEFAULT) != 0)
    @button.buttonStyle &= ~BUTTON_DEFAULT
    assert((@button.buttonStyle & BUTTON_DEFAULT) == 0)

    @button.buttonStyle |= BUTTON_INITIAL      # unlike others, this should
not work
    assert((@button.buttonStyle & BUTTON_INITIAL) == 0)
  end

  def testState
    assert_not_nil(@button.state)
    assert_kind_of(Fixnum, @button.state)

    @button.state = STATE_UP
    assert_equal(STATE_UP, @button.state)

    @button.state = STATE_DOWN
    assert_equal(STATE_DOWN, @button.state)

    @button.state = STATE_ENGAGED
    assert_equal(STATE_ENGAGED, @button.state)

    @button.state = STATE_CHECKED
    assert_equal(STATE_CHECKED, @button.state)

    @button.state = STATE_UNCHECKED
    assert_equal(STATE_UNCHECKED, @button.state)
  end
end


In This Thread

Prev Next