From: Nat Pryce <nat.pryce@...13media.com>
Date: 2002-03-13T01:31:50+09:00
Subject: Re: Method type 'abstract'

In Ruby *all* methods are abstract unless implemented by a class.

Or to put it in a more useful way, abstract methods are not required in a
dynamically typed language such as Ruby, only in typed languages like Java
or C++.

________________________________
Dr. Nathaniel Pryce
B13media Ltd.
40-41 Whiskin St, London, EC1R 0BP, UK
http://www.b13media.com

----- Original Message -----
From: "Peter Hickman" <peter@semantico.com>
To: "ruby-talk ML" <ruby-talk@ruby-lang.org>
Sent: Tuesday, March 12, 2002 4:24 PM
Subject: Method type 'abstract'


> The one thing I miss in Ruby is the abstract class method to go along
> with public and private. I know it is easy to work around by having the
> default abstract class simply raise an exception but would it be
> difficult to implement this as part of Ruby?
>