From: W.L.Kleb@... (Bil Kleb)
Date: 2002-03-20T14:41:49+09:00
Subject: Re: Rubicon -> Test::Unit

"Nathaniel Talbott" <nathaniel@talbott.ws> wrote:
> 
> Kleb wrote:
> > 
> > I ask because we currently use Rubicon's BulkTestRunner
> > to summarize our RubyUnit test results via
> 
> So you're looking for support for the BulkTestRunner capability under
> native Test::Unit?

Yes, we find it produces a nice summary of all our UnitTests.

> what are the features you find useful in the BulkTestRunner
> over the Console::TestRunner?

Summary information.  Console::TestRunner may be able to provide it
directly as I do not completely understand the way it works (or is
supposed to work)..;

> > Note: each TestSuite still has to use the old-syle RubyUnit
> > format, otherwise all the tests are executed twice, e.g.,
> 
> What do you mean by RubyUnit format? The __FILE__ == $0 thing? Or
> something else?

The __FILE__ == $0 thing, but I think it was due to a broken version
of rubyunit with respect to something like TestRunnerMediator.run?

--
Bil Kleb
NASA Langley Research Center
Hampton, Virginia, USA