From: Chris Gehlker <gehlker@...>
Date: 2002-03-17T00:55:54+09:00
Subject: Re: [ANN] rpkg 0.3.1 Small bug and a question

On 3/16/02 3:13 AM, "Massimiliano Mirra" <list@chromatic-harp.com> wrote:

>> You might have fixed this. My browser doesn't like your site and the RRA
>> only had 3.0. 
> 
> But the RAA points to a .tar.gz on the same site.  There is no
> associated page, maybe your browser didn't like that. ;-)

Ah. Then it was the right file. It just had the wrong name because they
hadn't updated the RRA yet. It's updated today.

> Anyway, I plan to shed much hardcoding, above all those
> Config::CONFIG's, and allow packagers to fill whatever content
> directories they want as long as such directories are also configured
> on the installing user's systems.  This would make rpkg more useful
> for general (i.e. not necessarily Ruby-related) packaging and provide
> more flexibility for us.

This is a really good idea.
-- 
War is God's way of teaching Americans geography.
-Ambrose Bierce, writer(1842-1914)