From: Sean O'Dell Date: 2002-03-14T05:23:43+09:00 Subject: Re: Some potential RCRs wrote in message news:a6nq50$q4m$1@usenet.Stanford.EDU... > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > In article <3C8E3C81.9010605@pinkjuice.com>, > Tobias Reif wrote: > >Bob Alexander wrote: > > > > > >> Dir methods that produce directory entries should never produce "." and > >> "..". > > > > > >seems to make sense > > > > - - Not to me. A dir method that doesn't return "." and ".." > would be EVIL. I want to know all the entries in the directory > not what some damn fool library author thinks I should be > interested in. Down that path lies madness... > > - - A much better solution would be added support for file "type" > matching. I.e. give me all the "simple" files in this directory > or give me all the symlinks, or all the subdirs... Something > similar to the kind of knobs that unix find gives you. Exactly what I was getting at. Sean