From: Matt Armstrong <matt@...>
Date: 2002-03-14T08:23:10+09:00
Subject: Re: testunit - setup -> set_up ?

"Nathaniel Talbott" <nathaniel@talbott.ws> writes:

> One is to issue a warning if you have a method named #setup.

I like this best, though I'd only warn if set_up is also absent.  It
has the same justification as your assert_equals decision.

These issues always boil down to "this isn't a good time to make that
change, even though it is more correct."  Well, if a total
re-implementation isn't a good time, when is?

Test::Unit has a new API.  There is the RUnit backward compatibility
layer for old code.  You can't copy/paste RUnit code into Test::Unit
test cases without making changes.

-- 
matt