From: Nathaniel Talbott <nathaniel@...>
Date: 2002-03-15T11:04:01+09:00
Subject: RE: testunit - setup -> set_up ?

Yukihiro Matsumoto [mailto:matz@ruby-lang.org] wrote:

> In message "RE: testunit - setup -> set_up ?"
>     on 02/03/14, "Nathaniel Talbott" <nathaniel@talbott.ws> writes:
> 
> |Ah, but JUnit uses setUp... two words. So which is the "xUnit way?"
> 
> I just miss "setup" just for its conciseness.

Woah... pressure comes to bear ;-)

Actually, with the experience fresh on my mind of writing a couple of
emails about this whole thing and accidentally typing "setup" instead of
"set up" _every_ time I used it, I'm beginning to agree. It makes me
feel really wishy-washy, but I'll survive.

To avoid more floundering, let me bring up a couple of other name
changes I'm pondering:

#assert_raises -> #assert_raised
#assert_nothing_raised -> #assert_not_raised
#assert_throws -> #assert_thrown
#assert_nothing_thrown -> #assert_not_thrown

I'll keep thinking about #setup vs. #set_up, and get back to ya'll.


Nathaniel

<:((><
+ - -
| RoleModel Software, Inc.
| EQUIP VI