From: Josh Huber <huber@...>
Date: 2002-03-12T07:27:07+09:00
Subject: Re: is there any way ...

Kenny Tilton <ktilton@nyc.rr.com> writes:

> But 1.~3 or 1.!3 (depending on what Ruby considers "not") would have
> been an excellent choices. Then you could also have 1~.3 or 1!.3 and
> 1~~3 or 1!!3.

I think you should join the perl development team! ;)

-- 
Josh Huber