From: David Corbin <dcorbin@...>
Date: 2002-03-18T23:28:11+09:00
Subject: Re: eval/Module question (clearer)

Maybe it is.  I'll have to play around with that....

Kent Dahl wrote:

>Chris Morris wrote:
>
>>Obviously, that still leaves you with your problem ... Ron's solution is one
>>way out -- don't know if there's another.
>>
>
>Isn't this what the possibility of explicit binding passing to eval is
>for?
>
><SNIP>
>[kentda@v128a kentda]$ irb
>irb(main):001:0> module X
>irb(main):002:1> eval("def x;puts 'top.x';end", TOPLEVEL_BINDING )
>irb(main):003:1> end
>nil
>irb(main):004:0> x
>top.x
>nil
></SNIP>
>
>Or am I missing something subtle?
>