From: Peter Hickman <peter@...>
Date: 2002-03-13T02:24:11+09:00
Subject: Re: Method type 'abstract'

Nat Pryce wrote:

>Why not just *not* implement the method at all and let method_missing throw
>the exception for you?
>
>That's what I meant when I said that in Ruby all methods are abstract unless
>explicitly implemented.
>
>Cheers,
>            Nat.
>

That looks interesting. I'll have to look at it.

Thanks.