[#35036] Intentional Programming — "John" <nojgoalbyspam@...>

Hi all

17 messages 2002/03/01

[#35112] RDoc question — Michael Davis <mdavis@...>

I have a question about RDoc. I would like to reference an external

17 messages 2002/03/02

[#35162] string to array and back — Ron Jeffries <ronjeffries@...>

I am needing to convert strings to arrays of bytes and back. I see pack and

19 messages 2002/03/03

[#35364] file reading impossibly slow? — Ron Jeffries <ronjeffries@...>

So I'm doing this benchmark to work with my set program. Part of the problem is

18 messages 2002/03/07

[#35429] Interesting link on static/dynamic typing... — Robert Feldt <feldt@...>

...relevant to Ruby compared to other languages discussion:

25 messages 2002/03/08
[#35441] Re: Interesting link on static/dynamic typing... — Paul Brannan <paul@...> 2002/03/08

On Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 05:34:43PM +0900, Robert Feldt wrote:

[#35460] Spam, ruby-talk, and me — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

14 messages 2002/03/08

[#35537] Confusion — David Corbin <dcorbin@...>

The following is from my debugging through xmlc.rb

16 messages 2002/03/10

[#35579] RE: WIN32OLE and LDAP — "Morris, Chris" <chris.morris@...>

> The new version 0.4.2 of Win32OLE has WIN32OLE.bind method.

16 messages 2002/03/11

[#35652] Method type 'abstract' — Peter Hickman <peter@...>

The one thing I miss in Ruby is the abstract class method to go along

15 messages 2002/03/12

[#35653] Some potential RCRs — "Bob Alexander" <bobalex@...>

Here are a few thing I am considering submitting as RCRs. I'm looking =

50 messages 2002/03/12
[#35672] Re: Some potential RCRs — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2002/03/12

Hi,

[#35683] Re: Some potential RCRs — Massimiliano Mirra <list@...> 2002/03/12

On Wed, Mar 13, 2002 at 03:58:01AM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#35697] Re: Some potential RCRs — David Alan Black <dblack@...> 2002/03/13

Hello --

[#35694] rpkg 0.3 — Massimiliano Mirra <list@...>

14 messages 2002/03/13
[#35699] RE: [ANN] rpkg 0.3 — <james@...> 2002/03/13

>

[#35787] testunit - setup -> set_up ? — "Morris, Chris" <chris.morris@...>

I'm just starting to use testunit instead of rubyunit ... I noticed with an

21 messages 2002/03/13
[#35793] RE: testunit - setup -> set_up ? — "Nathaniel Talbott" <nathaniel@...> 2002/03/13

Morris, Chris [mailto:chris.morris@snelling.com] wrote:

[#35796] Re: testunit - setup -> set_up ? — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2002/03/13

"Nathaniel Talbott" <nathaniel@talbott.ws> writes:

[#35797] RE: testunit - setup -> set_up ? — "Nathaniel Talbott" <nathaniel@...> 2002/03/13

dave@thomases.com [mailto:dave@thomases.com] wrote:

[#35898] camelCase and underscore_style — "Morris, Chris" <chris.morris@...>

First, a question. If underscore_style is the Ruby norm for methods and the

20 messages 2002/03/15
[#35924] Re: camelCase and underscore_style — "Guy N. Hurst" <gnhurst@...> 2002/03/15

Phil Tomson wrote:

[#35930] RE: camelCase and underscore_style — "Nathaniel Talbott" <nathaniel@...> 2002/03/16

Guy N. Hurst [mailto:gnhurst@hurstlinks.com] wrote:

[#35989] ANN: Locana GUI and GUI Builder version 0.81 — Michael Davis <mdavis@...>

I am pleased to announce release 0.81 of Locana. Locana is a GUI

16 messages 2002/03/16

[#35992] XPath — Michael Schuerig <schuerig@...>

27 messages 2002/03/16

[#36034] Mini Rant: Indenting — Thomas Hurst <tom.hurst@...>

Why is it that I see *so* much code like:

14 messages 2002/03/17

[#36049] web templating for static sites? — Massimiliano Mirra <list@...>

I'm using the Template Toolkit for generating static web sites and I

42 messages 2002/03/17
[#36426] web standars (was: web templating for static sites?) — Tobias Reif <tobiasreif@...> 2002/03/20

Albert Wagner wrote:

[#36052] Xml Serialization for Ruby — "Chris Morris" <chrismo@...>

=Xml Serialization for Ruby

20 messages 2002/03/17
[#36059] Re: [ANN] Xml Serialization for Ruby — Massimiliano Mirra <list@...> 2002/03/17

On Mon, Mar 18, 2002 at 05:20:56AM +0900, Chris Morris wrote:

[#36067] eval/Module question — David Corbin <dcorbin@...>

If I have a String src that is similar to the following:

13 messages 2002/03/18

[#36157] Development of Windows version of Ruby — ptkwt@...1.aracnet.com (Phil Tomson)

Now that we've dumped the cygwin requirement for the Windows version of

63 messages 2002/03/18
[#36330] Re: Development of Windows version of Ruby — Ron Jeffries <ronjeffries@...> 2002/03/19

On Tue, 19 Mar 2002 14:05:27 GMT, "Albert L. Wagner" <alwagner@uark.edu> wrote:

[#36431] Re: Development of Windows version of Ruby — Dennis Newbold <dennisn@...> 2002/03/20

[#36458] Windows version of Ruby (proposals) — ptkwt@... (Phil Tomson) 2002/03/21

Dennis Newbold <dennisn@pe.net> wrote in message news:<Pine.GSO.3.96.1020320113603.22242B-100000@shell2>...

[#36482] RE: Windows version of Ruby (proposals) — "Christian Boos" <cboos@...> 2002/03/21

Some thoughts on the 2 first Windows issues, plus a 4th one...

[#36496] Re: Windows version of Ruby (proposals) — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2002/03/21

"Christian Boos" <cboos@bct-technology.com> writes:

[#36510] Re: Windows version of Ruby (proposals) — nobu.nokada@... 2002/03/21

Hi,

[#36514] Re: Windows version of Ruby (proposals) — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2002/03/21

nobu.nokada@softhome.net writes:

[#36518] Re: Windows version of Ruby (proposals) — nobu.nokada@... 2002/03/21

Hi,

[#36211] dots in Dir.entries — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)

Hi,

22 messages 2002/03/19

[#36231] style choice — Ron Jeffries <ronjeffries@...>

A style question for the community ... which of the following do you prefer, and

18 messages 2002/03/19

[#36345] ANN: REXML 2.0 — Sean Russell <ser@...>

I have a feeling there will only be three major revisions of REXML. Version

19 messages 2002/03/20

[#36610] Re: Windows version of Ruby (proposals) — Ron Jeffries <ronjeffries@...>

On Thu, 21 Mar 2002 14:11:55 GMT, Dave Thomas <Dave@PragmaticProgrammer.com> wrote:

16 messages 2002/03/22

[#36645] Ruby for Mac OS 10.1 — Jim Freeze <jim@...>

Hi:

28 messages 2002/03/23

[#36768] Re: Difference between 'do' and 'begin' — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...>

In <slrna9ulvi.f2h.mwg@fluffy.isd.dp.ua> Wladimir Mutel <mwg@fluffy.isd.dp.ua> writes:

23 messages 2002/03/26
[#36783] RE: Difference between 'do' and 'begin' — <james@...> 2002/03/26

[#36792] Re: Difference between 'do' and 'begin' — Kent Dahl <kentda@...> 2002/03/26

james@rubyxml.com wrote:

[#36808] Error calling Tk in a loop — <james@...>

I'm trying to write some code that pops up a Tk window when for certain

15 messages 2002/03/26

[#36841] RE: Windows version of Ruby (proposals) — "Andres Hidalgo" <sol123@...>

I believe that Ruby has a place in windows (Office), I happened to have

14 messages 2002/03/27

[#36863] Hash.new(Hash.new) doesn't use Hash.new as default value — "Jonas Delfs" <jonas@...>

Hi -

18 messages 2002/03/27

[#37080] Why isn't Math object-oriented? — Bil Kleb <W.L.Kleb@...>

So I'm reading along in the Pixaxe book (yet again), and I am told

15 messages 2002/03/30

[#37121] String#begins?(s) — timsuth@... (Tim Sutherland)

class String

24 messages 2002/03/31

Test::Unit GTk GUI

From: Bil Kleb <W.L.Kleb@...>
Date: 2002-03-18 05:23:36 UTC
List: ruby-talk #36093
While trying to get a "green bar" with Test::Unit using the GTk
option, I experience the following error:

 /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.6/test/unit/ui/gtk/testrunner.rb:284:in `set_font': file gdkfont.c: line 236   (gdk_font_ref): assertion `font != NULL' failed. (Gdk::Error)
        from /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.6/test/unit/ui/gtk/testrunner.rb:284:in `fault_detail_label'
        from /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.6/test/unit/ui/gtk/testrunner.rb:280:in `lazy_initialize'
        from /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.6/test/unit/ui/gtk/testrunner.rb:280:in `fault_detail_label'
        from /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.6/test/unit/ui/gtk/testrunner.rb:276:in `inner_detail_sub_panel'
        from /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.6/test/unit/ui/gtk/testrunner.rb:274:in `lazy_initialize'
        from /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.6/test/unit/ui/gtk/testrunner.rb:274:in `inner_detail_sub_panel'
        from /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.6/test/unit/ui/gtk/testrunner.rb:270:in `outer_detail_sub_panel'
        from /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.6/test/unit/ui/gtk/testrunner.rb:268:in `lazy_initialize'
         ... 13 levels...
        from /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.6/test/unit/ui/gtk/testrunner.rb:54:in `setup_ui'
        from /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.6/test/unit/ui/gtk/testrunner.rb:39:in `start'
        from /usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.6/test/unit/ui/gtk/testrunner.rb:26:in `run'
        from GuiDuckUT.rb:14
 Loaded suite GuiDuckUT
 Started...
 ...
 Finished in 0.013897 seconds.
 2 runs, 2 assertions, 0 failures, 0 errors

This corresponds to the following method in testrunner.rb,

 def fault_detail_label # :nodoc:
  lazy_initialize(:fault_detail_label) {
   @fault_detail_label = EnhancedLabel.new("")
   style = Gtk::Style.new
   font = Gdk::Font.font_load("-*-Courier New-medium-r-normal--*-120-*-*-*-*-*-*")
   style.set_font(font)      <<<<*** line 284 ***
   @fault_detail_label.set_style(style)
   @fault_detail_label.set_justify(Gtk::JUSTIFY_LEFT)
   @fault_detail_label.set_line_wrap(false) }
 end

I am running RH7.2 with Ruby 1.6.7, GTk 1.2.10, and Ruby-GTk-0.25,
and TestUnit-0.1.4 on the following:

 <file name="GuiDuckUT.rb">
  require 'test/unit'

  class GuiDuckUT < Test::Unit::TestCase
   def testOne
    assert_equal 1, 1
   end
   def testText
    assert_equal 'test', 'test', 'text is the same'
   end
  end

  if $0 == __FILE__ then
    require 'test/unit/ui/gtk/testrunner'
    Test::Unit::UI::GTK::TestRunner.run(GuiDuckUT.suite)
#    require 'test/unit/ui/console/testrunner'
#    Test::Unit::UI::Console::TestRunner.run(GuiDuckUT.suite)
  end
 </file>

The test cases in Ruby-GTk-0.25 all seem to work fine and the
above runs just fine through the Console interface.

-- 
Bil Kleb
NASA Langley Research Center
Hampton, Virginia, USA

In This Thread

Prev Next