[#10209] Market for XML Web stuff — Matt Sergeant <matt@...>

I'm trying to get a handle on what the size of the market for AxKit would be

15 messages 2001/02/01

[#10238] RFC: RubyVM (long) — Robert Feldt <feldt@...>

Hi,

20 messages 2001/02/01
[#10364] Re: RFC: RubyVM (long) — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2001/02/05

[#10708] Suggestion for threading model — Stephen White <spwhite@...>

I've been playing around with multi-threading. I notice that there are

11 messages 2001/02/11

[#10853] Re: RubyChangeRequest #U002: new proper name for Hash#indexes, Array#indexes — "Mike Wilson" <wmwilson01@...>

10 messages 2001/02/14

[#11037] to_s and << — "Brent Rowland" <tarod@...>

list = [1, 2.3, 'four', false]

15 messages 2001/02/18

[#11094] Re: Summary: RCR #U002 - proper new name fo r indexes — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>

> On Mon, 19 Feb 2001, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

12 messages 2001/02/19

[#11131] Re: Summary: RCR #U002 - proper new name fo r indexes — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneik@...>

Robert Feldt wrote:

10 messages 2001/02/19

[#11251] Programming Ruby is now online — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

36 messages 2001/02/21

[#11469] XML-RPC and KDE — schuerig@... (Michael Schuerig)

23 messages 2001/02/24
[#11490] Re: XML-RPC and KDE — schuerig@... (Michael Schuerig) 2001/02/24

Michael Neumann <neumann@s-direktnet.de> wrote:

[#11491] Negative Reviews for Ruby and Programming Ruby — Jim Freeze <jim@...> 2001/02/24

Hi all:

[#11633] RCR: shortcut for instance variable initialization — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

13 messages 2001/02/26

[#11652] RE: RCR: shortcut for instance variable initialization — Michael Davis <mdavis@...>

I like it!

14 messages 2001/02/27

[#11700] Starting Once Again — Ron Jeffries <ronjeffries@...>

OK, I'm starting again with Ruby. I'm just assuming that I've

31 messages 2001/02/27
[#11712] RE: Starting Once Again — "Aaron Hinni" <aaron@...> 2001/02/27

> 2. So far I think running under TextPad will be better than running

[#11726] Re: Starting Once Again — Aleksi Niemel<zak@...> 2001/02/28

On Wed, 28 Feb 2001, Aaron Hinni wrote:

[ruby-talk:11731] Re: Interfacing with Java (sort-of)

From: "Ben Tilly" <ben_tilly@...>
Date: 2001-02-28 02:25:09 UTC
List: ruby-talk #11731
"Conrad Schneiker" <schneik@us.ibm.com> wrote:

>Hi,
>
>Is anyone familiar with low-level aspects of Java internals and whatever
>Sun's Java community license is?

I am not familiar with Java's internals, but here is a
synopsis of their Community Source License.  Here is our
source code.  Feel free to read.  If you make changes
you have to send them to us.  Unless we say you can, you
cannot distribute those changes to anyone else, tell
people about the bugs you fixed/enhancements you made,
and cannot even tell people about bugs you found.  Oh,
and you are not allowed to export this code to any
country whose intellectual property laws are not in our
opinion strong enough to make this stick...

>Are most of the basic Java libraries written in C? What I'm wondering is
>whether it would ever be feasible and reasonable to make use of various
>Java libraries (e.g. Swing, etc.) for cross-platform Ruby versions,
>without having to go through the JVM or through JNI stuff.

I believe that most are written in Java, and many have
optimized C versions for specific platforms, but will
default back to the slower Java versions elsewhere.
The specific instance I heard about is that they have
a very nice vector math package which on Solaris and
Windows has wonderfully optimized implementations that
play games like offloading calculations to your
graphics card.  But they refuse to let anyone write a
C version for Linux, making Linux look bad...

Anyways if you want to see the low-level internals of
Java, what I have heard is that you definitely want to
stay away from the SCSL - go download Jikes (C++) and
read that implementation instead.

Cheers,
Ben
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com

In This Thread

Prev Next