[#10209] Market for XML Web stuff — Matt Sergeant <matt@...>

I'm trying to get a handle on what the size of the market for AxKit would be

15 messages 2001/02/01

[#10238] RFC: RubyVM (long) — Robert Feldt <feldt@...>

Hi,

20 messages 2001/02/01
[#10364] Re: RFC: RubyVM (long) — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2001/02/05

[#10708] Suggestion for threading model — Stephen White <spwhite@...>

I've been playing around with multi-threading. I notice that there are

11 messages 2001/02/11

[#10853] Re: RubyChangeRequest #U002: new proper name for Hash#indexes, Array#indexes — "Mike Wilson" <wmwilson01@...>

10 messages 2001/02/14

[#11037] to_s and << — "Brent Rowland" <tarod@...>

list = [1, 2.3, 'four', false]

15 messages 2001/02/18

[#11094] Re: Summary: RCR #U002 - proper new name fo r indexes — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>

> On Mon, 19 Feb 2001, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

12 messages 2001/02/19

[#11131] Re: Summary: RCR #U002 - proper new name fo r indexes — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneik@...>

Robert Feldt wrote:

10 messages 2001/02/19

[#11251] Programming Ruby is now online — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

36 messages 2001/02/21

[#11469] XML-RPC and KDE — schuerig@... (Michael Schuerig)

23 messages 2001/02/24
[#11490] Re: XML-RPC and KDE — schuerig@... (Michael Schuerig) 2001/02/24

Michael Neumann <neumann@s-direktnet.de> wrote:

[#11491] Negative Reviews for Ruby and Programming Ruby — Jim Freeze <jim@...> 2001/02/24

Hi all:

[#11633] RCR: shortcut for instance variable initialization — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

13 messages 2001/02/26

[#11652] RE: RCR: shortcut for instance variable initialization — Michael Davis <mdavis@...>

I like it!

14 messages 2001/02/27

[#11700] Starting Once Again — Ron Jeffries <ronjeffries@...>

OK, I'm starting again with Ruby. I'm just assuming that I've

31 messages 2001/02/27
[#11712] RE: Starting Once Again — "Aaron Hinni" <aaron@...> 2001/02/27

> 2. So far I think running under TextPad will be better than running

[#11726] Re: Starting Once Again — Aleksi Niemel<zak@...> 2001/02/28

On Wed, 28 Feb 2001, Aaron Hinni wrote:

[ruby-talk:11347] Re: dRuby problem with Threads(still need solution - Threads problem?)

From: ptkwt@...1.aracnet.com (Phil Tomson)
Date: 2001-02-22 21:10:03 UTC
List: ruby-talk #11347
OK, I'm gonna try posting this for the third time...  could be duplicates, but it 
doesn't seem to want to go.

In article <Xns905072CA26D28wyshelblingch@130.133.1.4>,
Clemens Wyss <wys@helbling.ch> wrote:
>ptkwt@shell1.aracnet.com (Phil Tomson) wrote in
><Sb3l6.739$Vf.26882@typhoon.aracnet.com>: 
>
>>This is a strange one - then again It's about 11:20PM so everything is
>>looking strange.
>>
>...for me it's 11:20am
>
>I let the server and the client run on the same W2K-box.
>This is the slightly modified client code:
>#### client
>require 'drb'
>machine = "localhost"
>command = "this is the command"
>DRb.start_service()
>drbObj  = DRbObject.new(nil, "druby://#{machine}:9000")
>def threaded(drbObj, command)
>  thread = Thread.new() {
>    p "start"
>    drbObj.eval_it(command)
>    p "end"
>  } #thread   
>  thread.join() # Phil you *forgot* this one!

Actually, no I didn't forget this - I don't want it.  Adding thread.join here 
effectively blocks so that execution doesn't continue till after the thread 
finishes.  This is a distributed app that sends commands to several machines 
running various Unix and Windows OS's.  The intent is for it to send a command and 
then go look for the next available machine (not to wait around for the current 
target to finish).


>end
>#DRb.stop_service()
>def single(drbObj, command)
>  p "start"
>  drbObj.eval_it(command)
>  p "end"
>end
>
>single(drbObj, command)
>threaded(drbObj, command)
>#####
>
>Note the thread.join()-line. Looks like windows terminates immediately
>(i.e. tearing down your thread -> this could be the reason for your error
>messages!) without the join-call. Now calling my code sometimes (not
>allways though) produces the following error on the client side!: 
>
>"/cygdrive/d/ruby/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.6/drb/drb.rb:189:in `open':
>Invalid argument - "connect(2)" (Errno::EINVAL) 
>        from E:\drb_cl.rb:12:in `join'
>        from E:\drb_cl.rb:12:in `threaded'
>        from E:\drb_cl.rb:22
>"
>
>Looks like there is still a *slight* problem, just a different one.
>Clemens
>
I didn't see that problem when I added the join (just to try it out).

So my question still remains - why does the dRuby server care if a method was 
called from the client's main thread of execution or from another spawned thread?


It works from Linux -> Linux, but not from Linux -> Windows (server running on 
Windows).  I believe it used to work when all my machines were running 1.6.1 with 
drb 1.2.2 (now we're all at 1.6.2 with drb 1.3)

Phil


In This Thread

Prev Next