[#10209] Market for XML Web stuff — Matt Sergeant <matt@...>

I'm trying to get a handle on what the size of the market for AxKit would be

15 messages 2001/02/01

[#10238] RFC: RubyVM (long) — Robert Feldt <feldt@...>

Hi,

20 messages 2001/02/01
[#10364] Re: RFC: RubyVM (long) — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2001/02/05

[#10708] Suggestion for threading model — Stephen White <spwhite@...>

I've been playing around with multi-threading. I notice that there are

11 messages 2001/02/11

[#10853] Re: RubyChangeRequest #U002: new proper name for Hash#indexes, Array#indexes — "Mike Wilson" <wmwilson01@...>

10 messages 2001/02/14

[#11037] to_s and << — "Brent Rowland" <tarod@...>

list = [1, 2.3, 'four', false]

15 messages 2001/02/18

[#11094] Re: Summary: RCR #U002 - proper new name fo r indexes — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>

> On Mon, 19 Feb 2001, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

12 messages 2001/02/19

[#11131] Re: Summary: RCR #U002 - proper new name fo r indexes — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneik@...>

Robert Feldt wrote:

10 messages 2001/02/19

[#11251] Programming Ruby is now online — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

36 messages 2001/02/21

[#11469] XML-RPC and KDE — schuerig@... (Michael Schuerig)

23 messages 2001/02/24
[#11490] Re: XML-RPC and KDE — schuerig@... (Michael Schuerig) 2001/02/24

Michael Neumann <neumann@s-direktnet.de> wrote:

[#11491] Negative Reviews for Ruby and Programming Ruby — Jim Freeze <jim@...> 2001/02/24

Hi all:

[#11633] RCR: shortcut for instance variable initialization — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

13 messages 2001/02/26

[#11652] RE: RCR: shortcut for instance variable initialization — Michael Davis <mdavis@...>

I like it!

14 messages 2001/02/27

[#11700] Starting Once Again — Ron Jeffries <ronjeffries@...>

OK, I'm starting again with Ruby. I'm just assuming that I've

31 messages 2001/02/27
[#11712] RE: Starting Once Again — "Aaron Hinni" <aaron@...> 2001/02/27

> 2. So far I think running under TextPad will be better than running

[#11726] Re: Starting Once Again — Aleksi Niemel<zak@...> 2001/02/28

On Wed, 28 Feb 2001, Aaron Hinni wrote:

[ruby-talk:11727] Re: Starting Once Again

From: "Conrad Schneiker" <schneik@...>
Date: 2001-02-28 01:20:39 UTC
List: ruby-talk #11727
Aaron Hinni wrote:

# I use gvim with the ruby.vim file installed to enable syntax
# highlighting to make the code even easier to read(this file needed
# tweaking, if anyone needs a working version, let me know).  Also
# added some simple menu commands to execute ruby scripts from the
# editor so that I didn't always have to pop back to the command line.
# 
# In order to speed up the test creation process, I created a simple
# ruby script to generate a test case file.  Type 'create_test
# ClassName' on the command line, and the script will create
# ClassNameTest.rb and fill the file with the necessary scaffolding to
# work with RubyUnit(looks like simpletest.rb).  This script can be
# built by using a HERE document and some simple regexps.

Has a corrected ruby.vim file been submitted to the vim folks?

You might want to start an "editors & IDE-like extras" branch with a 
"vim/gvim" sub-branch somewhere on (http://rubygarden.com/ruby) and post 
your fixed ruby.vim and your other extensions. (And then post an 
announcement back here.) Others could then follow suit for the xemacs 
operating system and for jEdit editor. And the perpetually overburdened 
Ruby FAQ maintainers could point people there for the latest 
editor-related info.

Likewise for your create_test stuff, although I suppose that could also go 
on (http://www.rubycookbook.org). I'm not sure how this is supposed to 
differ from rubygarden, although the GNU license is certainly interesting, 
although it might discourage conventional publications from using it as a 
resource. I prefer the rubygarden license, which seems to encourage 
everyone and anyone to freely mine it for publishable stuff, which I think 
would encourage the publication of more doorstops. We need at least 
another half-dozen of those to help catapult Ruby ahead of Python and 
Perl, and another half-dozen after that to make Ruby a front runner with 
Java. :-)

(Did anyone else notice that doing a "Refactorings'R'us" ((what the 
rubygarden people call themselves)) on itself produces a new type of 
dinosaur: the "refactoring-s'Rus"? :-)

Conrad Schneiker
(This note is unofficial and subject to improvement without notice.)

In This Thread

Prev Next