[#10209] Market for XML Web stuff — Matt Sergeant <matt@...>

I'm trying to get a handle on what the size of the market for AxKit would be

15 messages 2001/02/01

[#10238] RFC: RubyVM (long) — Robert Feldt <feldt@...>

Hi,

20 messages 2001/02/01
[#10364] Re: RFC: RubyVM (long) — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2001/02/05

[#10708] Suggestion for threading model — Stephen White <spwhite@...>

I've been playing around with multi-threading. I notice that there are

11 messages 2001/02/11

[#10853] Re: RubyChangeRequest #U002: new proper name for Hash#indexes, Array#indexes — "Mike Wilson" <wmwilson01@...>

10 messages 2001/02/14

[#11037] to_s and << — "Brent Rowland" <tarod@...>

list = [1, 2.3, 'four', false]

15 messages 2001/02/18

[#11094] Re: Summary: RCR #U002 - proper new name fo r indexes — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>

> On Mon, 19 Feb 2001, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

12 messages 2001/02/19

[#11131] Re: Summary: RCR #U002 - proper new name fo r indexes — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneik@...>

Robert Feldt wrote:

10 messages 2001/02/19

[#11251] Programming Ruby is now online — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

36 messages 2001/02/21

[#11469] XML-RPC and KDE — schuerig@... (Michael Schuerig)

23 messages 2001/02/24
[#11490] Re: XML-RPC and KDE — schuerig@... (Michael Schuerig) 2001/02/24

Michael Neumann <neumann@s-direktnet.de> wrote:

[#11491] Negative Reviews for Ruby and Programming Ruby — Jim Freeze <jim@...> 2001/02/24

Hi all:

[#11633] RCR: shortcut for instance variable initialization — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

13 messages 2001/02/26

[#11652] RE: RCR: shortcut for instance variable initialization — Michael Davis <mdavis@...>

I like it!

14 messages 2001/02/27

[#11700] Starting Once Again — Ron Jeffries <ronjeffries@...>

OK, I'm starting again with Ruby. I'm just assuming that I've

31 messages 2001/02/27
[#11712] RE: Starting Once Again — "Aaron Hinni" <aaron@...> 2001/02/27

> 2. So far I think running under TextPad will be better than running

[#11726] Re: Starting Once Again — Aleksi Niemel<zak@...> 2001/02/28

On Wed, 28 Feb 2001, Aaron Hinni wrote:

[ruby-talk:11041] Re: to_s and <<

From: Stephen White <spwhite@...>
Date: 2001-02-18 08:27:14 UTC
List: ruby-talk #11041
On Sun, 18 Feb 2001, Brent Rowland wrote:

> s = "and the answer is: "
> list.each {|item| s << item }
> 
> testltlt.rb:4:in `<<': failed to convert Float into String (TypeError)

For the same reason you can't do:

  a = "hello"
  a << 1.23

  irb(main):011:0> a << 1.23
  TypeError: failed to convert Float into String

The reason it works with the first element:

  a = "hello"
  a << 1

  irb(main):003:0> a << 1
  "hello\001"

Ruby is treating the "1" as a character value, not as a number. This can be
verified by this:

  a = "hello"
  a << 4237432

  irb(main):013:0> a << 4237432
  TypeError: failed to convert Fixnum into String

Perl will automatically convert between types. Ruby won't make these
assumptions on your behalf, which is a little annoying in the short
term but a choice that I like in the long term.

You can achieve what you want with:

  list.each {|item| s << item.to_s }

Which explicitly converts each element to a string. This will give you:

  "and the answer is: 12.3fourfalse"

You can also do:

  s = "and the answer is: " + list.join(', ')

which gives:

  "and the answer is: 1, 2.3, four, false"

-- 
  spwhite@chariot.net.au

In This Thread