From: Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...>
Date: 2001-02-20T13:06:55+09:00
Subject: [ruby-talk:11147] Re: Summary: RCR #U002 - proper new name fo r indexes

On Tue, 20 Feb 2001, David Alan Black wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Feb 2001, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:
> > > should be the same, or developed in parallel.  (For instance, I've
> > > never missed having Array#has_value?)
> > Maybe that's because it's called Array#include? ?
> I meant I never missed being able to call it as #has_value? (as one
> can in the case of Hash#include?) -- just musing about the fact that
> there are already differences in array and hash terminology.

ok, i understand now.

btw, Hash#include? is not an alias for Hash#has_value?, but for
Hash#has_key?.  :-) 

matju