[#10209] Market for XML Web stuff — Matt Sergeant <matt@...>

I'm trying to get a handle on what the size of the market for AxKit would be

15 messages 2001/02/01

[#10238] RFC: RubyVM (long) — Robert Feldt <feldt@...>

Hi,

20 messages 2001/02/01
[#10364] Re: RFC: RubyVM (long) — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2001/02/05

[#10708] Suggestion for threading model — Stephen White <spwhite@...>

I've been playing around with multi-threading. I notice that there are

11 messages 2001/02/11

[#10853] Re: RubyChangeRequest #U002: new proper name for Hash#indexes, Array#indexes — "Mike Wilson" <wmwilson01@...>

10 messages 2001/02/14

[#11037] to_s and << — "Brent Rowland" <tarod@...>

list = [1, 2.3, 'four', false]

15 messages 2001/02/18

[#11094] Re: Summary: RCR #U002 - proper new name fo r indexes — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>

> On Mon, 19 Feb 2001, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

12 messages 2001/02/19

[#11131] Re: Summary: RCR #U002 - proper new name fo r indexes — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneik@...>

Robert Feldt wrote:

10 messages 2001/02/19

[#11251] Programming Ruby is now online — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

36 messages 2001/02/21

[#11469] XML-RPC and KDE — schuerig@... (Michael Schuerig)

23 messages 2001/02/24
[#11490] Re: XML-RPC and KDE — schuerig@... (Michael Schuerig) 2001/02/24

Michael Neumann <neumann@s-direktnet.de> wrote:

[#11491] Negative Reviews for Ruby and Programming Ruby — Jim Freeze <jim@...> 2001/02/24

Hi all:

[#11633] RCR: shortcut for instance variable initialization — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

13 messages 2001/02/26

[#11652] RE: RCR: shortcut for instance variable initialization — Michael Davis <mdavis@...>

I like it!

14 messages 2001/02/27

[#11700] Starting Once Again — Ron Jeffries <ronjeffries@...>

OK, I'm starting again with Ruby. I'm just assuming that I've

31 messages 2001/02/27
[#11712] RE: Starting Once Again — "Aaron Hinni" <aaron@...> 2001/02/27

> 2. So far I think running under TextPad will be better than running

[#11726] Re: Starting Once Again — Aleksi Niemel<zak@...> 2001/02/28

On Wed, 28 Feb 2001, Aaron Hinni wrote:

[ruby-talk:10439] Re: Preemptive scheduling?

From: Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...>
Date: 2001-02-06 17:58:04 UTC
List: ruby-talk #10439
On Tue, 6 Feb 2001, Clemens Wyss wrote:

> In the following example:
>   def recursion(n)
>     if n == 0 then
>       1
>     else
>       (n * recursion(n-1)) **2 
>     end
>   end

rewriting it differently:

y = 1
(1..ARGV[0].to_i).each {|n|
        y = (y * n) ** 2
        p y
}

This gives a very fast-growing sequence:

1
4
144
331776
2751882854400
272622932796264897576960000
3641839910835401567626683591527643364677019238400000000


This series is almost an exponential of an exponential!

The size of an integer is expressed in bytes. A byte is worth about 2.4
decimal digits.

at n=10 the size is 6004.

Squaring that number takes a time similar to the square of its number of
digits. Even by working by blocks of 32 bits (4 bytes), you don't get away
with less than a million operations.

Ruby's threading system is preemptive within Ruby code, but is cooperative
at the C level.

Operations on integers are atomic, that is, ininterruptible.

The time it takes to kill depends on the speed of your machine. 
Counterintuitively, the faster it is, the more time it takes to kill your
thread.



matju

note: integers are padded with zeros up to a digit count multiple of 4.


In This Thread