[#10209] Market for XML Web stuff — Matt Sergeant <matt@...>

I'm trying to get a handle on what the size of the market for AxKit would be

15 messages 2001/02/01

[#10238] RFC: RubyVM (long) — Robert Feldt <feldt@...>

Hi,

20 messages 2001/02/01
[#10364] Re: RFC: RubyVM (long) — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2001/02/05

[#10708] Suggestion for threading model — Stephen White <spwhite@...>

I've been playing around with multi-threading. I notice that there are

11 messages 2001/02/11

[#10853] Re: RubyChangeRequest #U002: new proper name for Hash#indexes, Array#indexes — "Mike Wilson" <wmwilson01@...>

10 messages 2001/02/14

[#11037] to_s and << — "Brent Rowland" <tarod@...>

list = [1, 2.3, 'four', false]

15 messages 2001/02/18

[#11094] Re: Summary: RCR #U002 - proper new name fo r indexes — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>

> On Mon, 19 Feb 2001, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

12 messages 2001/02/19

[#11131] Re: Summary: RCR #U002 - proper new name fo r indexes — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneik@...>

Robert Feldt wrote:

10 messages 2001/02/19

[#11251] Programming Ruby is now online — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

36 messages 2001/02/21

[#11469] XML-RPC and KDE — schuerig@... (Michael Schuerig)

23 messages 2001/02/24
[#11490] Re: XML-RPC and KDE — schuerig@... (Michael Schuerig) 2001/02/24

Michael Neumann <neumann@s-direktnet.de> wrote:

[#11491] Negative Reviews for Ruby and Programming Ruby — Jim Freeze <jim@...> 2001/02/24

Hi all:

[#11633] RCR: shortcut for instance variable initialization — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

13 messages 2001/02/26

[#11652] RE: RCR: shortcut for instance variable initialization — Michael Davis <mdavis@...>

I like it!

14 messages 2001/02/27

[#11700] Starting Once Again — Ron Jeffries <ronjeffries@...>

OK, I'm starting again with Ruby. I'm just assuming that I've

31 messages 2001/02/27
[#11712] RE: Starting Once Again — "Aaron Hinni" <aaron@...> 2001/02/27

> 2. So far I think running under TextPad will be better than running

[#11726] Re: Starting Once Again — Aleksi Niemel<zak@...> 2001/02/28

On Wed, 28 Feb 2001, Aaron Hinni wrote:

[ruby-talk:10249] Re: POLS question: returning from a closure

From: David Alan Black <dblack@...>
Date: 2001-02-02 04:21:32 UTC
List: ruby-talk #10249
On Thu, 1 Feb 2001, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:

> "return" returns from "real" methods; for closures you have to return
> values "naturally", that is, by the value of the last expression in the
> closure's body.
> 
> This feature allows for things such as:
> 
> class SomeArray
>   def index(v)
>     each_with_index {|x,i|
>        return i if x==v
>     }
>     nil
>   end
> end

Interesting -- I see the workings of it now, though it's still on my
list of POLS question-marks.  Somehow:

  n = Proc.new { return 100 } .call

feels like it should result in n == 100.  

Anyway, tinkering with this reveals some fun subtleties.  For
instance:

  def yes1
    Proc.new { return true } .call
    # not reached
  end

  def yes2
    Proc.new { true } .call
    # reached
  end

  p yes1     # true
  p yes2     # true


Not very real-world, but definitely subtle :-) And, playing with where
the call happens, one can do this:

  def yes3
    Proc.new { true }
  end

  p yes3.call

but not this:

  def yes4
    Proc.new { return true }
  end

  p yes4.call


I'd rather hoped that wrapping the Proc in a named method would make
it feel that it had something to return *from*: 

  def yes5
    Proc.new { return true }
  end

  def wrapper
    yes5.call
  end

but it wasn't fooled:

  p wrapper     # LocalJumpError

(It's that context of creation thing again :-)


David

-- 
David Alan Black
home: dblack@candle.superlink.net
work: blackdav@shu.edu
Web:  http://pirate.shu.edu/~blackdav


In This Thread