[#10209] Market for XML Web stuff — Matt Sergeant <matt@...>

I'm trying to get a handle on what the size of the market for AxKit would be

15 messages 2001/02/01

[#10238] RFC: RubyVM (long) — Robert Feldt <feldt@...>

Hi,

20 messages 2001/02/01
[#10364] Re: RFC: RubyVM (long) — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2001/02/05

[#10708] Suggestion for threading model — Stephen White <spwhite@...>

I've been playing around with multi-threading. I notice that there are

11 messages 2001/02/11

[#10853] Re: RubyChangeRequest #U002: new proper name for Hash#indexes, Array#indexes — "Mike Wilson" <wmwilson01@...>

10 messages 2001/02/14

[#11037] to_s and << — "Brent Rowland" <tarod@...>

list = [1, 2.3, 'four', false]

15 messages 2001/02/18

[#11094] Re: Summary: RCR #U002 - proper new name fo r indexes — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>

> On Mon, 19 Feb 2001, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

12 messages 2001/02/19

[#11131] Re: Summary: RCR #U002 - proper new name fo r indexes — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneik@...>

Robert Feldt wrote:

10 messages 2001/02/19

[#11251] Programming Ruby is now online — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

36 messages 2001/02/21

[#11469] XML-RPC and KDE — schuerig@... (Michael Schuerig)

23 messages 2001/02/24
[#11490] Re: XML-RPC and KDE — schuerig@... (Michael Schuerig) 2001/02/24

Michael Neumann <neumann@s-direktnet.de> wrote:

[#11491] Negative Reviews for Ruby and Programming Ruby — Jim Freeze <jim@...> 2001/02/24

Hi all:

[#11633] RCR: shortcut for instance variable initialization — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

13 messages 2001/02/26

[#11652] RE: RCR: shortcut for instance variable initialization — Michael Davis <mdavis@...>

I like it!

14 messages 2001/02/27

[#11700] Starting Once Again — Ron Jeffries <ronjeffries@...>

OK, I'm starting again with Ruby. I'm just assuming that I've

31 messages 2001/02/27
[#11712] RE: Starting Once Again — "Aaron Hinni" <aaron@...> 2001/02/27

> 2. So far I think running under TextPad will be better than running

[#11726] Re: Starting Once Again — Aleksi Niemel<zak@...> 2001/02/28

On Wed, 28 Feb 2001, Aaron Hinni wrote:

[ruby-talk:10337] Re: ANN: Slide show available

From: "Christoph Rippel" <crippel@...>
Date: 2001-02-04 05:34:33 UTC
List: ruby-talk #10337
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ben Tilly [mailto:ben_tilly@hotmail.com]
> Sent: Saturday, February 03, 2001 04:18 PM
> To: ruby-talk ML
> Subject: [ruby-talk:10324] Re: ANN: Slide show available
> 
> 
> matz@zetabits.com (Yukihiro Matsumoto) wrote:
> >
> >Hi,
> >
> >In message "[ruby-talk:10292] Re: ANN: Slide show available"
> >     on 01/02/03, "Ben Tilly" <ben_tilly@hotmail.com> writes:
> >
> >|I have asthma and do not like to be near smoke.  While
> >|I drink I have little interest in the ins and outs of
> >|beer.  Those two facts put together make Perl Mongers
> >|meeting places unpleasant, and make the mailing lists
> >|uninteresting to me.
> >|
> >|C'est la vie.
> >
> >Well, same thing happens to me, although I don't have asthma.  I don't
> >smoke, I don't drink alcohol (for religious reason).  And I hate smoke
> >and heavily drunk people.
> 
> I can't imagine why...
> 
> >How about having a smoke-less party when I visit you.
> 
> Much preferable. :-)
> 
> >By the way, I was surprised to see so many people smoking in public in
> >France.  It's worse than Japan, which I had believed the worst country.
> 
> What I have heard is that it is pretty bad everywhere
> except the US and Canada.  And even there people smoked
> pretty heavily until recently.  Today if it isn't a bar,
> it probably isn't full of people smoking.
The best part (IMO a bit excessive) of California's anti 
smoking laws is that the non-smoking zone extend about 12 feet 
(meters-yards? sorry I am a not smoker) of any public building
and you will have a hard time of meeting publicly drunk people
if you are able to ignore the abundance of homeless people.
> 
> >Some people there were astonished when they knew my real age.  I was
> >appeared like a child from westerners' view.
> 
> Indeed.  That is due to something called neoteny.
> 
> <digression>
> 
> Neoteny consists of retaining juvenile characteristics
> into adulthood.  Compared to the great apes all humans
> show a great deal of neoteny.  Different races different
> amounts.  The various Oriental races have more of a
> tendancy that way than Caucasians do, with the result
> that Caucasions look old to Orientals and conversely
> Orientals look much younger than they are to Caucasians.
> 
> Virtually all domestic animals likewise show neoteny.
> For instance dogs are biologically immature wolves.
> Indeed the closer a particular breed of dog comes to
> actually growing up, the more aggressive it is.  Because
> of this there is a strong link between the physical
> appearance of a breed of dogs and their temperment.
> 
> For much (much) more on this, Stephen J. Gould has an
> interesting book on this topic called "Ontogeny and
> Phylogeny".
> 
> </digression>
<really off topic>
Hm the juvenile characteristics you quote include 
large body size and small teeth.  I believe that
you won't have trouble finding anthropologists who 
will be rather skeptical if neoteny is particularly
relevant for human evolution and some of Gould's 
more material claims have been proven wrong.
</really off topic>

Christoph


In This Thread