[#10209] Market for XML Web stuff — Matt Sergeant <matt@...>

I'm trying to get a handle on what the size of the market for AxKit would be

15 messages 2001/02/01

[#10238] RFC: RubyVM (long) — Robert Feldt <feldt@...>

Hi,

20 messages 2001/02/01
[#10364] Re: RFC: RubyVM (long) — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2001/02/05

[#10708] Suggestion for threading model — Stephen White <spwhite@...>

I've been playing around with multi-threading. I notice that there are

11 messages 2001/02/11

[#10853] Re: RubyChangeRequest #U002: new proper name for Hash#indexes, Array#indexes — "Mike Wilson" <wmwilson01@...>

10 messages 2001/02/14

[#11037] to_s and << — "Brent Rowland" <tarod@...>

list = [1, 2.3, 'four', false]

15 messages 2001/02/18

[#11094] Re: Summary: RCR #U002 - proper new name fo r indexes — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>

> On Mon, 19 Feb 2001, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

12 messages 2001/02/19

[#11131] Re: Summary: RCR #U002 - proper new name fo r indexes — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneik@...>

Robert Feldt wrote:

10 messages 2001/02/19

[#11251] Programming Ruby is now online — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

36 messages 2001/02/21

[#11469] XML-RPC and KDE — schuerig@... (Michael Schuerig)

23 messages 2001/02/24
[#11490] Re: XML-RPC and KDE — schuerig@... (Michael Schuerig) 2001/02/24

Michael Neumann <neumann@s-direktnet.de> wrote:

[#11491] Negative Reviews for Ruby and Programming Ruby — Jim Freeze <jim@...> 2001/02/24

Hi all:

[#11633] RCR: shortcut for instance variable initialization — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

13 messages 2001/02/26

[#11652] RE: RCR: shortcut for instance variable initialization — Michael Davis <mdavis@...>

I like it!

14 messages 2001/02/27

[#11700] Starting Once Again — Ron Jeffries <ronjeffries@...>

OK, I'm starting again with Ruby. I'm just assuming that I've

31 messages 2001/02/27
[#11712] RE: Starting Once Again — "Aaron Hinni" <aaron@...> 2001/02/27

> 2. So far I think running under TextPad will be better than running

[#11726] Re: Starting Once Again — Aleksi Niemel<zak@...> 2001/02/28

On Wed, 28 Feb 2001, Aaron Hinni wrote:

[ruby-talk:11250] Re: Telnet/SSH service

From: "Mitch Vincent" <mitch@...>
Date: 2001-02-21 18:58:07 UTC
List: ruby-talk #11250
Inetd could be a solution, sure, it really depends on the purpose of coding
this. If you want to learn to use sockets it would be a good idea to write
it all yourself. It really isn't hard at all, especially in Ruby!

Good luck!!

-Mitch

----- Original Message -----
From: "Gil Cohen" <gilc@shoploop.com>
To: "ruby-talk ML" <ruby-talk@ruby-lang.org>
Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2001 12:32 PM
Subject: [ruby-talk:11248] RE: Telnet/SSH service


> Using a lovely thing called inetd, you don't have to worry about sockets.
It
> does everything for you. Your program talks with whoever telnet'd in via
> stdin/stdout. pretty cool, eh? don't know what to tell you about the ssh
> thing though.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nosuzuki@e-mail.ne.jp [mailto:nosuzuki@e-mail.ne.jp]On Behalf Of
> Nick Bensema
> Sent: Tuesday, February 20, 2001 6:40 PM
> To: ruby-talk ML; ruby-talk@netlab.co.jp
> Subject: [ruby-talk:11191] Telnet/SSH service
>
>
> I'm among a group of people who are trying to get a simple BBS server up,
> with Telnet.
>
> Unfortunately, using raw sockets doesn't seem to work all that well.
> We can tinker with it to the point where it works with Windows Telnet,
> but most other clients get garbage characters and other such things.
>
> I'd rather work on features like a user list or message board than
> spend a few hours reinventing the wheel.  I'd like to know a couple of
> things:
>
> first, is there a Telnet server module available?  I'm aware of the
> client one, but it doesn't look like it goes both ways.
>
> Second, if I were to get OpenSSL support working, would that be enough
> to talk to ssh clients?
>
> --
> Nick Bensema <nickb@io.com>      ICQ#2135445
> ==== ======= ==============
> BOY, THIS IS REALLY EXPENSIVE!
>
>
>

In This Thread