[#10209] Market for XML Web stuff — Matt Sergeant <matt@...>

I'm trying to get a handle on what the size of the market for AxKit would be

15 messages 2001/02/01

[#10238] RFC: RubyVM (long) — Robert Feldt <feldt@...>

Hi,

20 messages 2001/02/01
[#10364] Re: RFC: RubyVM (long) — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2001/02/05

[#10708] Suggestion for threading model — Stephen White <spwhite@...>

I've been playing around with multi-threading. I notice that there are

11 messages 2001/02/11

[#10853] Re: RubyChangeRequest #U002: new proper name for Hash#indexes, Array#indexes — "Mike Wilson" <wmwilson01@...>

10 messages 2001/02/14

[#11037] to_s and << — "Brent Rowland" <tarod@...>

list = [1, 2.3, 'four', false]

15 messages 2001/02/18

[#11094] Re: Summary: RCR #U002 - proper new name fo r indexes — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>

> On Mon, 19 Feb 2001, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

12 messages 2001/02/19

[#11131] Re: Summary: RCR #U002 - proper new name fo r indexes — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneik@...>

Robert Feldt wrote:

10 messages 2001/02/19

[#11251] Programming Ruby is now online — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

36 messages 2001/02/21

[#11469] XML-RPC and KDE — schuerig@... (Michael Schuerig)

23 messages 2001/02/24
[#11490] Re: XML-RPC and KDE — schuerig@... (Michael Schuerig) 2001/02/24

Michael Neumann <neumann@s-direktnet.de> wrote:

[#11491] Negative Reviews for Ruby and Programming Ruby — Jim Freeze <jim@...> 2001/02/24

Hi all:

[#11633] RCR: shortcut for instance variable initialization — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

13 messages 2001/02/26

[#11652] RE: RCR: shortcut for instance variable initialization — Michael Davis <mdavis@...>

I like it!

14 messages 2001/02/27

[#11700] Starting Once Again — Ron Jeffries <ronjeffries@...>

OK, I'm starting again with Ruby. I'm just assuming that I've

31 messages 2001/02/27
[#11712] RE: Starting Once Again — "Aaron Hinni" <aaron@...> 2001/02/27

> 2. So far I think running under TextPad will be better than running

[#11726] Re: Starting Once Again — Aleksi Niemel<zak@...> 2001/02/28

On Wed, 28 Feb 2001, Aaron Hinni wrote:

[ruby-talk:11311] Re: Programming Ruby is now online

From: "W. Kent Starr" <elderburn@...>
Date: 2001-02-22 13:50:45 UTC
List: ruby-talk #11311
On Thursday 22 February 2001 08:10, Andrew Hunt wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Feb 2001 09:48:01 +0900, Jim Freeze <jim@freeze.org> wrote:
> > On Thu, 22 Feb 2001, Dave Thomas wrote:
> > > > > The book is released under an Open Publication license, so you're
> > > > > free to make copies--see the file COPYING in the download for
> > > > > details.
> >
> > This is a great resource. I have the printed book, but it is nice to have
> > a searchable version online when I forget 'the book'.
> >
> > I'm curious though, no party's had an objection to releasing the
> > book online in fear that it would decrease sales of the book?
>
> Quite the opposite, I think.  I've been lured by a number of openly
> available texts (or MP3's) and then gone on to buy the real article.
> It's very handy to have a clickable, searchable version of a reference
> manual, but there are times (especially when you aren't sure what you're
> looking for) that you want the paper version.  I need and use both, so
> I think in the long term this will both help sales of the book and
> further promote Ruby to those with casual interest.
>
> /\ndy
>

At the risk of using incitive language, Jupiter Research, pretty much 
respected for its methods and provable results, concluded that CD sales in 
music stores actually *increased* as a side effect of Napster (the incitive 
word). Hardcopy is a different vehicle, serves different needs. Many like 
having both.

(Think of mp3 in terms of 'radio' and you'll get a feel for the dynamics 
involved in this.)

While there are certainly those who for philosophical or practical reasons 
will/can not buy the book (and I suspect a some at the other end of the 
spectrum who will/can not use the online version) I suspect the bulk of 
people will acquire and use both at different times and in different contexts.

One teet that transcends economic 'waves': markets are made, not born! Even 
some members of the RIAA are catching on to this. :-)

Regards,

Kent Starr
elderburn@mindspring.com


In This Thread