[#10209] Market for XML Web stuff — Matt Sergeant <matt@...>

I'm trying to get a handle on what the size of the market for AxKit would be

15 messages 2001/02/01

[#10238] RFC: RubyVM (long) — Robert Feldt <feldt@...>

Hi,

20 messages 2001/02/01
[#10364] Re: RFC: RubyVM (long) — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2001/02/05

[#10708] Suggestion for threading model — Stephen White <spwhite@...>

I've been playing around with multi-threading. I notice that there are

11 messages 2001/02/11

[#10853] Re: RubyChangeRequest #U002: new proper name for Hash#indexes, Array#indexes — "Mike Wilson" <wmwilson01@...>

10 messages 2001/02/14

[#11037] to_s and << — "Brent Rowland" <tarod@...>

list = [1, 2.3, 'four', false]

15 messages 2001/02/18

[#11094] Re: Summary: RCR #U002 - proper new name fo r indexes — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>

> On Mon, 19 Feb 2001, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

12 messages 2001/02/19

[#11131] Re: Summary: RCR #U002 - proper new name fo r indexes — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneik@...>

Robert Feldt wrote:

10 messages 2001/02/19

[#11251] Programming Ruby is now online — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

36 messages 2001/02/21

[#11469] XML-RPC and KDE — schuerig@... (Michael Schuerig)

23 messages 2001/02/24
[#11490] Re: XML-RPC and KDE — schuerig@... (Michael Schuerig) 2001/02/24

Michael Neumann <neumann@s-direktnet.de> wrote:

[#11491] Negative Reviews for Ruby and Programming Ruby — Jim Freeze <jim@...> 2001/02/24

Hi all:

[#11633] RCR: shortcut for instance variable initialization — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

13 messages 2001/02/26

[#11652] RE: RCR: shortcut for instance variable initialization — Michael Davis <mdavis@...>

I like it!

14 messages 2001/02/27

[#11700] Starting Once Again — Ron Jeffries <ronjeffries@...>

OK, I'm starting again with Ruby. I'm just assuming that I've

31 messages 2001/02/27
[#11712] RE: Starting Once Again — "Aaron Hinni" <aaron@...> 2001/02/27

> 2. So far I think running under TextPad will be better than running

[#11726] Re: Starting Once Again — Aleksi Niemel<zak@...> 2001/02/28

On Wed, 28 Feb 2001, Aaron Hinni wrote:

[ruby-talk:10619] How to convince management

From: ptkwt@...1.aracnet.com (Phil Tomson)
Date: 2001-02-09 05:40:02 UTC
List: ruby-talk #10619
I wrote a project proposal for an upcoming project and I proposed that we 
use Ruby for it.  In the project planning meeting the proposal to use Ruby 
was strongly opposed by management types - "We use C++ and Perl for 
projects here and that's it!  This project will be done in Perl!".  I 
managed to get them to at least let me schedule a future meeting where I 
will present the case for using Ruby.

Background - This is an internal application for distributing testcases to 
several client machines on a network.  Results from running testcases need 
to be gathered from client machines and results posted on an internal 
website that must be updated as tests are run.  To me it seems a natural 
dRuby application - objects running on remote machines which take care of 
running testcases as they come in from a central server.  Other objects 
taking care of 'harvesting' results data and sending it to the web server.  
Currently we use Perl for a similar system that is not distributed (it has 
just a single client and a single server) hence the push for continuing to 
user Perl.

Managment is understandably suspicious of using Ruby - they've never heard 
of it before and they don't know if it is stable.  They say there is no 
in-house Ruby expertise (actually only myself and one other programmer 
would be working on the system and I don't think it would be difficult to 
transition from Perl to Ruby for either of us).

Has anyone else out there faced a similar situation and succeeded in 
convincing management?  Does anyone out there have success stories about 
using Ruby for fairly largescale projects that I can show to my 
management?

Thanks.

Phil

In This Thread

Prev Next