[#10209] Market for XML Web stuff — Matt Sergeant <matt@...>

I'm trying to get a handle on what the size of the market for AxKit would be

15 messages 2001/02/01

[#10238] RFC: RubyVM (long) — Robert Feldt <feldt@...>

Hi,

20 messages 2001/02/01
[#10364] Re: RFC: RubyVM (long) — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2001/02/05

[#10708] Suggestion for threading model — Stephen White <spwhite@...>

I've been playing around with multi-threading. I notice that there are

11 messages 2001/02/11

[#10853] Re: RubyChangeRequest #U002: new proper name for Hash#indexes, Array#indexes — "Mike Wilson" <wmwilson01@...>

10 messages 2001/02/14

[#11037] to_s and << — "Brent Rowland" <tarod@...>

list = [1, 2.3, 'four', false]

15 messages 2001/02/18

[#11094] Re: Summary: RCR #U002 - proper new name fo r indexes — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>

> On Mon, 19 Feb 2001, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

12 messages 2001/02/19

[#11131] Re: Summary: RCR #U002 - proper new name fo r indexes — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneik@...>

Robert Feldt wrote:

10 messages 2001/02/19

[#11251] Programming Ruby is now online — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

36 messages 2001/02/21

[#11469] XML-RPC and KDE — schuerig@... (Michael Schuerig)

23 messages 2001/02/24
[#11490] Re: XML-RPC and KDE — schuerig@... (Michael Schuerig) 2001/02/24

Michael Neumann <neumann@s-direktnet.de> wrote:

[#11491] Negative Reviews for Ruby and Programming Ruby — Jim Freeze <jim@...> 2001/02/24

Hi all:

[#11633] RCR: shortcut for instance variable initialization — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

13 messages 2001/02/26

[#11652] RE: RCR: shortcut for instance variable initialization — Michael Davis <mdavis@...>

I like it!

14 messages 2001/02/27

[#11700] Starting Once Again — Ron Jeffries <ronjeffries@...>

OK, I'm starting again with Ruby. I'm just assuming that I've

31 messages 2001/02/27
[#11712] RE: Starting Once Again — "Aaron Hinni" <aaron@...> 2001/02/27

> 2. So far I think running under TextPad will be better than running

[#11726] Re: Starting Once Again — Aleksi Niemel<zak@...> 2001/02/28

On Wed, 28 Feb 2001, Aaron Hinni wrote:

[ruby-talk:11589] Re: Array bugs?

From: "Ben Tilly" <ben_tilly@...>
Date: 2001-02-26 13:36:38 UTC
List: ruby-talk #11589
I hate following up to myself but...

"Ben Tilly" <ben_tilly@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>"Christoph Rippel" <crippel@primenet.com> wrote:
[...]
>Now the right way to do the caching strategy above
>would be to make methods like <=> be able to take
>1 or 2 arguments.  The optional argument would be
>the recursive cache, and the above check would be
>inserted into all of them.  Which would mean that
>you would move the cache code into Enumerable and
>then just call:
>
>    @cache, is_seen = check_cache(@cache, self.id, other.id)
>
>in every comparison method.
[...]

The better way would be for Enumerable to add methods
for get_cache, in_cache?, <=>, cmp, and for those who
want an efficient ==, eq.

The difference between == and eq, or <=> and cmp
would be 1 argument or 2.  The second argument is the
cache.  The <=> method would just add in an empty
cache and call cmp.  The cmp method would just call
<=>.  Classes which are complex data structures
should provide cmp and mixin <=>.  Simple classes
should provide <=> and mixin cmp.  Similarly eq would
just throw ==.

Inside of cmp in complex data structures you are
expected to do your own:

  return true if in_cache?(cache, id, other.id)

Thoughts?  Feedback?

Cheers,
Ben
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com

In This Thread

Prev Next