[#10209] Market for XML Web stuff — Matt Sergeant <matt@...>

I'm trying to get a handle on what the size of the market for AxKit would be

15 messages 2001/02/01

[#10238] RFC: RubyVM (long) — Robert Feldt <feldt@...>

Hi,

20 messages 2001/02/01
[#10364] Re: RFC: RubyVM (long) — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2001/02/05

[#10708] Suggestion for threading model — Stephen White <spwhite@...>

I've been playing around with multi-threading. I notice that there are

11 messages 2001/02/11

[#10853] Re: RubyChangeRequest #U002: new proper name for Hash#indexes, Array#indexes — "Mike Wilson" <wmwilson01@...>

10 messages 2001/02/14

[#11037] to_s and << — "Brent Rowland" <tarod@...>

list = [1, 2.3, 'four', false]

15 messages 2001/02/18

[#11094] Re: Summary: RCR #U002 - proper new name fo r indexes — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>

> On Mon, 19 Feb 2001, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

12 messages 2001/02/19

[#11131] Re: Summary: RCR #U002 - proper new name fo r indexes — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneik@...>

Robert Feldt wrote:

10 messages 2001/02/19

[#11251] Programming Ruby is now online — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

36 messages 2001/02/21

[#11469] XML-RPC and KDE — schuerig@... (Michael Schuerig)

23 messages 2001/02/24
[#11490] Re: XML-RPC and KDE — schuerig@... (Michael Schuerig) 2001/02/24

Michael Neumann <neumann@s-direktnet.de> wrote:

[#11491] Negative Reviews for Ruby and Programming Ruby — Jim Freeze <jim@...> 2001/02/24

Hi all:

[#11633] RCR: shortcut for instance variable initialization — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

13 messages 2001/02/26

[#11652] RE: RCR: shortcut for instance variable initialization — Michael Davis <mdavis@...>

I like it!

14 messages 2001/02/27

[#11700] Starting Once Again — Ron Jeffries <ronjeffries@...>

OK, I'm starting again with Ruby. I'm just assuming that I've

31 messages 2001/02/27
[#11712] RE: Starting Once Again — "Aaron Hinni" <aaron@...> 2001/02/27

> 2. So far I think running under TextPad will be better than running

[#11726] Re: Starting Once Again — Aleksi Niemel<zak@...> 2001/02/28

On Wed, 28 Feb 2001, Aaron Hinni wrote:

[ruby-talk:11161] Re: Ruby success stories?

From: harryo@... (Harry Ohlsen)
Date: 2001-02-20 08:55:45 UTC
List: ruby-talk #11161
>Also, I'm supposed to compare Ruby to Perl, Python and Java (I really 
>don't think Java is appropriate for this problems space due to lack of 
>built-in regex and ways of running external apps, but I'll give it 
>a shot).

There's a third-party Java library for regular expressions that
accepts the same syntax as Perl.  I'll see if I can find a URL ...

	http://jakarta.apache.org/oro/index.html

I've used this before and it is excellent.  As far as I recall, his
licence is such that you can use it for commercial purposes, so long
as you're not building a product to on-sell.  Ie, if it's used to
write something that your company will use.

Of course, as you say, this is not bult-in.  But, of course, most of
the built-in libraries are written in Java, so there's nothing
particularly strange about using a third-party library like this, so
long as the licence agreement doesn't hinder you.

With regard to  executing other programs from inside Java, you can use
something like the following ...

	String command = "ls";

	Process process = Runtime.getRuntime().exec(command);

If you're interested, I have a small wrapper class I wrote, called
Shell, that hides most of the gory details of using a Process object.
I'd be happy to pass it on, if it would be of any use to you in your
evaluation.

I also have classes called Perl and Python ... if I was still writing
Java for a living, I'd have already whipped up a Ruby class :-) ...
that use this class to allow the sending of snippets of code to a Perl
or Python interpreter and retrieving the output.

Of course, I'm not trying to suggest you use Java rather than Ruby; it
just sounded like you might not know about these classes.

In This Thread