[#10209] Market for XML Web stuff — Matt Sergeant <matt@...>

I'm trying to get a handle on what the size of the market for AxKit would be

15 messages 2001/02/01

[#10238] RFC: RubyVM (long) — Robert Feldt <feldt@...>

Hi,

20 messages 2001/02/01
[#10364] Re: RFC: RubyVM (long) — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2001/02/05

[#10708] Suggestion for threading model — Stephen White <spwhite@...>

I've been playing around with multi-threading. I notice that there are

11 messages 2001/02/11

[#10853] Re: RubyChangeRequest #U002: new proper name for Hash#indexes, Array#indexes — "Mike Wilson" <wmwilson01@...>

10 messages 2001/02/14

[#11037] to_s and << — "Brent Rowland" <tarod@...>

list = [1, 2.3, 'four', false]

15 messages 2001/02/18

[#11094] Re: Summary: RCR #U002 - proper new name fo r indexes — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>

> On Mon, 19 Feb 2001, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

12 messages 2001/02/19

[#11131] Re: Summary: RCR #U002 - proper new name fo r indexes — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneik@...>

Robert Feldt wrote:

10 messages 2001/02/19

[#11251] Programming Ruby is now online — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

36 messages 2001/02/21

[#11469] XML-RPC and KDE — schuerig@... (Michael Schuerig)

23 messages 2001/02/24
[#11490] Re: XML-RPC and KDE — schuerig@... (Michael Schuerig) 2001/02/24

Michael Neumann <neumann@s-direktnet.de> wrote:

[#11491] Negative Reviews for Ruby and Programming Ruby — Jim Freeze <jim@...> 2001/02/24

Hi all:

[#11633] RCR: shortcut for instance variable initialization — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

13 messages 2001/02/26

[#11652] RE: RCR: shortcut for instance variable initialization — Michael Davis <mdavis@...>

I like it!

14 messages 2001/02/27

[#11700] Starting Once Again — Ron Jeffries <ronjeffries@...>

OK, I'm starting again with Ruby. I'm just assuming that I've

31 messages 2001/02/27
[#11712] RE: Starting Once Again — "Aaron Hinni" <aaron@...> 2001/02/27

> 2. So far I think running under TextPad will be better than running

[#11726] Re: Starting Once Again — Aleksi Niemel<zak@...> 2001/02/28

On Wed, 28 Feb 2001, Aaron Hinni wrote:

[ruby-talk:10629] Redefined symbol "select" in win32/win32.h

From: "Lyle Johnson" <ljohnson@...>
Date: 2001-02-09 16:10:02 UTC
List: ruby-talk #10629
This is probably a question more appropriate for the Ruby developers, but I
thought I'd throw it out here. I just lost a few fragments of time trying to
figure out why my Ruby extension code, which was trying to call a class
member function "select()" was failing to compile. In fact the compiler
complained that the C++ class didn't have a member function named
"myselect". I finally tracked it down to some code in the Ruby header file
win32/win32.h, which I suppose is included indirectly when you include
"ruby.h" on Win32 platforms.

I see what's going on; it looks like there's a replacement for the standard
Win32 select() named myselect() that I suppose works more like Unix
select(), or some other attempt at portability. Fair enough, but then you're
using a #define to redefine the string "select" and replace it with the
string "myselect". That is somewhat troubling, although I've hacked a
workaround, #undef'ing "select" after I include "ruby.h" anywhere.

Has anyone else been bitten by this when compiling with Visual C++ on
Windows? Any movement underway to perhaps find an alternate solution (i.e.
not redefining the string "select" like this)?


In This Thread

Prev Next