[#10209] Market for XML Web stuff — Matt Sergeant <matt@...>

I'm trying to get a handle on what the size of the market for AxKit would be

15 messages 2001/02/01

[#10238] RFC: RubyVM (long) — Robert Feldt <feldt@...>

Hi,

20 messages 2001/02/01
[#10364] Re: RFC: RubyVM (long) — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2001/02/05

[#10708] Suggestion for threading model — Stephen White <spwhite@...>

I've been playing around with multi-threading. I notice that there are

11 messages 2001/02/11

[#10853] Re: RubyChangeRequest #U002: new proper name for Hash#indexes, Array#indexes — "Mike Wilson" <wmwilson01@...>

10 messages 2001/02/14

[#11037] to_s and << — "Brent Rowland" <tarod@...>

list = [1, 2.3, 'four', false]

15 messages 2001/02/18

[#11094] Re: Summary: RCR #U002 - proper new name fo r indexes — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>

> On Mon, 19 Feb 2001, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

12 messages 2001/02/19

[#11131] Re: Summary: RCR #U002 - proper new name fo r indexes — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneik@...>

Robert Feldt wrote:

10 messages 2001/02/19

[#11251] Programming Ruby is now online — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

36 messages 2001/02/21

[#11469] XML-RPC and KDE — schuerig@... (Michael Schuerig)

23 messages 2001/02/24
[#11490] Re: XML-RPC and KDE — schuerig@... (Michael Schuerig) 2001/02/24

Michael Neumann <neumann@s-direktnet.de> wrote:

[#11491] Negative Reviews for Ruby and Programming Ruby — Jim Freeze <jim@...> 2001/02/24

Hi all:

[#11633] RCR: shortcut for instance variable initialization — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

13 messages 2001/02/26

[#11652] RE: RCR: shortcut for instance variable initialization — Michael Davis <mdavis@...>

I like it!

14 messages 2001/02/27

[#11700] Starting Once Again — Ron Jeffries <ronjeffries@...>

OK, I'm starting again with Ruby. I'm just assuming that I've

31 messages 2001/02/27
[#11712] RE: Starting Once Again — "Aaron Hinni" <aaron@...> 2001/02/27

> 2. So far I think running under TextPad will be better than running

[#11726] Re: Starting Once Again — Aleksi Niemel<zak@...> 2001/02/28

On Wed, 28 Feb 2001, Aaron Hinni wrote:

[ruby-talk:10938] Re: Making Hash from two lists

From: "Conrad Schneiker" <schneik@...>
Date: 2001-02-16 01:04:04 UTC
List: ruby-talk #10938
Kenichi Komiya

# In [ruby-list:27832], I posted a code snipet that let you create
# a Hash from lists of keys and values.
# 
#   hash = Hash.map(%w(Matz Larry), %(Ruby, Perl))
# 
#   p hash    # => {"Larry"=>"Perl", "Matz"=>"Ruby"}
# 
# The signature of this method looks like:
# 
#   Hash.map(keys, vals, def_val=nil)
# 
# Some details.
# 
#   * Keys and vals can be any Enumerable object.
# 
#   * If keys is longer than vals, def_val is assigned to these extra
#     keys.
# 
#   * If vals is longer than keys, these extra valuess are ignored.
#     (The vals enumerable is not iterated beyond length of keys).
# 
# matz's comments on this were:
# 
#   * The idea looks OK.
# 
#   * def_val may be an over design.
# 
#   * The name Hash.map may be confusing concidering existing
#     Hash#map, which does wildly different thing.
# 
# So, if people like this functionality and a good name is
# proposed, this may be included in some future version of
# interpretter.
# 
# Some questions:
# 
#   Q1: Do you think this is worth including to core Ruby?

Well, I think it should be in 'standard' Ruby. (I'm never sure what
people mean by 'core', since some people think of this as what is
built into Ruby, versus Ruby code in a Ruby library.) My preference
is for all these sorts of generalized data transformation tools to
be in Ruby out of the box. Even though it's easy to reinvent your own
wheels, axles, transmissions, crankshafts, and motors in Ruby, I think
it's still a good idea to give people a pretty extensive, 
pre-coordinated, and well-coordinated system to start off with.

#   Q2: Do you think the name is confusing?  If so what is good
#       name for this method?

I think it maybe wants to be <something>_map or map_<something>. I
don't know what <something> should be, however.

#   Q3: I belive there was a discussion to create a snipet
#       repository, which archives useful but small code examples.
#       Is this facility already online?

Well, there is (http://www.pragprog.com:8080/ruby?RubyOnlineCookbook).
Unfortunately there don't seem to be many handy links around to
point people here (or to the more general area around it). Anyone
want to change that? 

Conrad Schneiker
(This note is unofficial and subject to improvement without notice.)

In This Thread

Prev Next