[#10209] Market for XML Web stuff — Matt Sergeant <matt@...>

I'm trying to get a handle on what the size of the market for AxKit would be

15 messages 2001/02/01

[#10238] RFC: RubyVM (long) — Robert Feldt <feldt@...>

Hi,

20 messages 2001/02/01
[#10364] Re: RFC: RubyVM (long) — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2001/02/05

[#10708] Suggestion for threading model — Stephen White <spwhite@...>

I've been playing around with multi-threading. I notice that there are

11 messages 2001/02/11

[#10853] Re: RubyChangeRequest #U002: new proper name for Hash#indexes, Array#indexes — "Mike Wilson" <wmwilson01@...>

10 messages 2001/02/14

[#11037] to_s and << — "Brent Rowland" <tarod@...>

list = [1, 2.3, 'four', false]

15 messages 2001/02/18

[#11094] Re: Summary: RCR #U002 - proper new name fo r indexes — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>

> On Mon, 19 Feb 2001, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

12 messages 2001/02/19

[#11131] Re: Summary: RCR #U002 - proper new name fo r indexes — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneik@...>

Robert Feldt wrote:

10 messages 2001/02/19

[#11251] Programming Ruby is now online — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

36 messages 2001/02/21

[#11469] XML-RPC and KDE — schuerig@... (Michael Schuerig)

23 messages 2001/02/24
[#11490] Re: XML-RPC and KDE — schuerig@... (Michael Schuerig) 2001/02/24

Michael Neumann <neumann@s-direktnet.de> wrote:

[#11491] Negative Reviews for Ruby and Programming Ruby — Jim Freeze <jim@...> 2001/02/24

Hi all:

[#11633] RCR: shortcut for instance variable initialization — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

13 messages 2001/02/26

[#11652] RE: RCR: shortcut for instance variable initialization — Michael Davis <mdavis@...>

I like it!

14 messages 2001/02/27

[#11700] Starting Once Again — Ron Jeffries <ronjeffries@...>

OK, I'm starting again with Ruby. I'm just assuming that I've

31 messages 2001/02/27
[#11712] RE: Starting Once Again — "Aaron Hinni" <aaron@...> 2001/02/27

> 2. So far I think running under TextPad will be better than running

[#11726] Re: Starting Once Again — Aleksi Niemel<zak@...> 2001/02/28

On Wed, 28 Feb 2001, Aaron Hinni wrote:

[ruby-talk:10227] Re: limits on computation?

From: Mike Wilson <wmwilson1@...>
Date: 2001-02-01 18:37:15 UTC
List: ruby-talk #10227
-----Original Message-----
From: "Dave Thomas"<Dave@PragmaticProgrammer.com>
To: "ruby-talk ML"<ruby-talk@netlab.co.jp>
Date: Thu Feb 01 10:25:58 PST 2001
Subject: [ruby-talk:10224] Re: limits on computation?

>Mike Wilson <wmwilson1@go.com> writes:
>
>> Hmm, I've got a 16-way 10GB RAM Sun Enterprise 6500 sitting
>> here..... ;)
>
>If I pay the postage could you ship it over?

sure, postage would be $400,000, $600,000 if you want the TB of disk too, that good? ;)

Sorry I'm still on this, but would it maybe make sense to have one of the $SAFE levels cover such things?  If I wanted to make some online calculator, someone could just DOS the heck out of me like this (not that I'm doing that, but..).  Even checking input, I'd really have to take the given operations into account as well (i.e. (2**(2**(2**(2**(... ), would get hairy. ;)

Thanks

Mike Wilson
Unix Administrator
http://ruby.weblogs.com
___________________________________________________
GO.com Mail                                    
Get Your Free, Private E-mail at http://mail.go.com


In This Thread

Prev Next