[#10209] Market for XML Web stuff — Matt Sergeant <matt@...>

I'm trying to get a handle on what the size of the market for AxKit would be

15 messages 2001/02/01

[#10238] RFC: RubyVM (long) — Robert Feldt <feldt@...>

Hi,

20 messages 2001/02/01
[#10364] Re: RFC: RubyVM (long) — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2001/02/05

[#10708] Suggestion for threading model — Stephen White <spwhite@...>

I've been playing around with multi-threading. I notice that there are

11 messages 2001/02/11

[#10853] Re: RubyChangeRequest #U002: new proper name for Hash#indexes, Array#indexes — "Mike Wilson" <wmwilson01@...>

10 messages 2001/02/14

[#11037] to_s and << — "Brent Rowland" <tarod@...>

list = [1, 2.3, 'four', false]

15 messages 2001/02/18

[#11094] Re: Summary: RCR #U002 - proper new name fo r indexes — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>

> On Mon, 19 Feb 2001, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

12 messages 2001/02/19

[#11131] Re: Summary: RCR #U002 - proper new name fo r indexes — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneik@...>

Robert Feldt wrote:

10 messages 2001/02/19

[#11251] Programming Ruby is now online — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

36 messages 2001/02/21

[#11469] XML-RPC and KDE — schuerig@... (Michael Schuerig)

23 messages 2001/02/24
[#11490] Re: XML-RPC and KDE — schuerig@... (Michael Schuerig) 2001/02/24

Michael Neumann <neumann@s-direktnet.de> wrote:

[#11491] Negative Reviews for Ruby and Programming Ruby — Jim Freeze <jim@...> 2001/02/24

Hi all:

[#11633] RCR: shortcut for instance variable initialization — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

13 messages 2001/02/26

[#11652] RE: RCR: shortcut for instance variable initialization — Michael Davis <mdavis@...>

I like it!

14 messages 2001/02/27

[#11700] Starting Once Again — Ron Jeffries <ronjeffries@...>

OK, I'm starting again with Ruby. I'm just assuming that I've

31 messages 2001/02/27
[#11712] RE: Starting Once Again — "Aaron Hinni" <aaron@...> 2001/02/27

> 2. So far I think running under TextPad will be better than running

[#11726] Re: Starting Once Again — Aleksi Niemel<zak@...> 2001/02/28

On Wed, 28 Feb 2001, Aaron Hinni wrote:

[ruby-talk:11315] Re: Programming Ruby is now online

From: "Jan Matejka" <Jan.Matejka@...>
Date: 2001-02-22 14:31:54 UTC
List: ruby-talk #11315
It is a bug on a server side and "Microsoft artifical intelligence" on
client side.

When trying to download

http://dev.rubycentral.com/downloads/files/ProgrammingRuby-0.1.tgz

with my perl test script, this HTTP responce header was sent to me:

--------------------------------------
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Server: Netscape-Enterprise/3.6 SP3
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2001 02:53:18 GMT
Content-type: text/plain			<----- HERE IS THE ERROR
Last-modified: Thu, 22 Feb 2001 02:31:55 GMT
Content-length: 756936
Accept-ranges: bytes
--------------------------------------

Netscape Communicator uses Content-type from header
and behaves accordingly.

On the contrary IE doesn't trust/use this value at all.
It does its own magic by analysing  of received data
and then behaves correspondingly (this gives sometimes
very strange results).

MaT

>-----Original Message-----
>From: dave@thomases.com [mailto:dave@thomases.com]On Behalf Of
>Dave Thomas
>Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2001 11:25 PM
>To: ruby-talk ML
>Subject: [ruby-talk:11264] Re: Programming Ruby is now online
>
>
>Guillaume Cottenceau <gc@mandrakesoft.com> writes:
>
>> Dave Thomas <Dave@PragmaticProgrammer.com> writes:
>>
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> > The book is released under an Open Publication license, so
>you're free
>> > to make copies--see the file COPYING in the download for details.
>>
>> That's odd: I got the paper version of the book under my
>eyes right now,
>> and it's printed:
>>
>> -=-=--
>> Copyright (c) 2001 by Addison-Wesley.
>>
>> All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be
>reproduced, blah
>> blah, without the written permission of the publisher.
>> -=-=--
>
>The book was printed before all this happened. I'm not a lawyer, but I
>_think_ the copyright covers the form of representation, so that means
>that the book can be copyrighted by AWL and then the download can have
>a different copyright.
>
>
>Dave
>

In This Thread

Prev Next