[#10209] Market for XML Web stuff — Matt Sergeant <matt@...>

I'm trying to get a handle on what the size of the market for AxKit would be

15 messages 2001/02/01

[#10238] RFC: RubyVM (long) — Robert Feldt <feldt@...>

Hi,

20 messages 2001/02/01
[#10364] Re: RFC: RubyVM (long) — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2001/02/05

[#10708] Suggestion for threading model — Stephen White <spwhite@...>

I've been playing around with multi-threading. I notice that there are

11 messages 2001/02/11

[#10853] Re: RubyChangeRequest #U002: new proper name for Hash#indexes, Array#indexes — "Mike Wilson" <wmwilson01@...>

10 messages 2001/02/14

[#11037] to_s and << — "Brent Rowland" <tarod@...>

list = [1, 2.3, 'four', false]

15 messages 2001/02/18

[#11094] Re: Summary: RCR #U002 - proper new name fo r indexes — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>

> On Mon, 19 Feb 2001, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

12 messages 2001/02/19

[#11131] Re: Summary: RCR #U002 - proper new name fo r indexes — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneik@...>

Robert Feldt wrote:

10 messages 2001/02/19

[#11251] Programming Ruby is now online — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

36 messages 2001/02/21

[#11469] XML-RPC and KDE — schuerig@... (Michael Schuerig)

23 messages 2001/02/24
[#11490] Re: XML-RPC and KDE — schuerig@... (Michael Schuerig) 2001/02/24

Michael Neumann <neumann@s-direktnet.de> wrote:

[#11491] Negative Reviews for Ruby and Programming Ruby — Jim Freeze <jim@...> 2001/02/24

Hi all:

[#11633] RCR: shortcut for instance variable initialization — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

13 messages 2001/02/26

[#11652] RE: RCR: shortcut for instance variable initialization — Michael Davis <mdavis@...>

I like it!

14 messages 2001/02/27

[#11700] Starting Once Again — Ron Jeffries <ronjeffries@...>

OK, I'm starting again with Ruby. I'm just assuming that I've

31 messages 2001/02/27
[#11712] RE: Starting Once Again — "Aaron Hinni" <aaron@...> 2001/02/27

> 2. So far I think running under TextPad will be better than running

[#11726] Re: Starting Once Again — Aleksi Niemel<zak@...> 2001/02/28

On Wed, 28 Feb 2001, Aaron Hinni wrote:

[ruby-talk:11288] Array bugs?

From: "Christoph Rippel" <crippel@...>
Date: 2001-02-22 05:44:39 UTC
List: ruby-talk #11288
Hi,

I believe that there are issues in the way the Array
Class deals with self-referential arrays. (I became
aware of these issues by going throw the ArrayMixin
implementation.)

The set operations &, | hang with self-referential
arrays. My guess is that the implementation is based
on &= and |= (these operation hang to) and dup of self
- if this is so then the problem could be solved by
doing it the other way around - i.e. implementing
&=, |= in terms of &, |.

The #flatten! algorithm rejects simple non self-referential
arrays - z =[]; nonref = [1,z,z]; nonref.flatten! bombs.

The #flatten! algorithm happily flattens pretty convoluted
self-referential arrays like
ruby -e 'x = [1];y = ["a",x]; z=[2]; x << [[x,y]]; \
y << [[z,x]]; z<< [x]; p x.flatten! '
[1, "a",2]

There are fairly obvious algorithms to #flatten(!) any
array - basically untangle the ``array graph'' (not
unique for true self-referential arrays but there are
a couple of candidates sticking out) and flatten the
resulting ``array tree鋳.  A generalized #flatten(!)
method would have fairly descend properties (``convexity'')
but there are problem with threads and such a generalized
method is probably of questionable practical value
(there was little thread on this on the ruby-dev list
 a year ago - for example [ruby-dev:9017]).
On the other hand #flatten(!) should not reject simple
non self-referential arrays like ``nonref'' IMHO.

Christoph


In This Thread

Prev Next