[#10209] Market for XML Web stuff — Matt Sergeant <matt@...>

I'm trying to get a handle on what the size of the market for AxKit would be

15 messages 2001/02/01

[#10238] RFC: RubyVM (long) — Robert Feldt <feldt@...>

Hi,

20 messages 2001/02/01
[#10364] Re: RFC: RubyVM (long) — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2001/02/05

[#10708] Suggestion for threading model — Stephen White <spwhite@...>

I've been playing around with multi-threading. I notice that there are

11 messages 2001/02/11

[#10853] Re: RubyChangeRequest #U002: new proper name for Hash#indexes, Array#indexes — "Mike Wilson" <wmwilson01@...>

10 messages 2001/02/14

[#11037] to_s and << — "Brent Rowland" <tarod@...>

list = [1, 2.3, 'four', false]

15 messages 2001/02/18

[#11094] Re: Summary: RCR #U002 - proper new name fo r indexes — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>

> On Mon, 19 Feb 2001, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

12 messages 2001/02/19

[#11131] Re: Summary: RCR #U002 - proper new name fo r indexes — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneik@...>

Robert Feldt wrote:

10 messages 2001/02/19

[#11251] Programming Ruby is now online — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

36 messages 2001/02/21

[#11469] XML-RPC and KDE — schuerig@... (Michael Schuerig)

23 messages 2001/02/24
[#11490] Re: XML-RPC and KDE — schuerig@... (Michael Schuerig) 2001/02/24

Michael Neumann <neumann@s-direktnet.de> wrote:

[#11491] Negative Reviews for Ruby and Programming Ruby — Jim Freeze <jim@...> 2001/02/24

Hi all:

[#11633] RCR: shortcut for instance variable initialization — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

13 messages 2001/02/26

[#11652] RE: RCR: shortcut for instance variable initialization — Michael Davis <mdavis@...>

I like it!

14 messages 2001/02/27

[#11700] Starting Once Again — Ron Jeffries <ronjeffries@...>

OK, I'm starting again with Ruby. I'm just assuming that I've

31 messages 2001/02/27
[#11712] RE: Starting Once Again — "Aaron Hinni" <aaron@...> 2001/02/27

> 2. So far I think running under TextPad will be better than running

[#11726] Re: Starting Once Again — Aleksi Niemel<zak@...> 2001/02/28

On Wed, 28 Feb 2001, Aaron Hinni wrote:

[ruby-talk:11112] Re: Summary: RCR #U002 - proper new name fo r indexes

From: "Mike Wilson" <wmwilson01@...>
Date: 2001-02-19 16:09:30 UTC
List: ruby-talk #11112


>From: Robert Feldt <feldt@ce.chalmers.se>
>Reply-To: ruby-talk@ruby-lang.org
>To: ruby-talk@ruby-lang.org (ruby-talk ML)
>Subject: [ruby-talk:11105] Re: Summary: RCR #U002 - proper new name fo r 
>indexes
>Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2001 00:17:42 +0900
>
>On Tue, 20 Feb 2001, Jean Michel wrote:
>
> > >> >   (a) Hash#values, Array#values
> > >> >   (b) Hash#values_for, Array#values_for
> > >> >   (g) Hash#selections, Array#selections
> > >> >   (h) Hash#collect_indexes, Array#collect_indexes
> > >> >   (f) Hash#subset, Array#subset
> >
>but I'd vote for Hash#elements_at/Array#elements_at or
>Hash#elements/Array#elements.
>

Just wanted to jump in and give 3 cents worth.  This is an argument that 
could go on endlessly.  It's based primarly on personal preference and isn't 
really worth continuing much longer (IMHO).  I'd like to suggest that matz 
has enough offerings on the table and propose that we should discontinue 
this thread in favor of matz making the final decision so that we continue 
with other matters.  As Dave said on #ruby-lang (paraphrased) "matz has done 
a great job with naming.  If it were me, and I was programming in Japanese 
you'd be using Array#goldfish".

Mike Wilson
Unix Administrator
http://ruby.weblogs.com

_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com

In This Thread

Prev Next