[#10209] Market for XML Web stuff — Matt Sergeant <matt@...>

I'm trying to get a handle on what the size of the market for AxKit would be

15 messages 2001/02/01

[#10238] RFC: RubyVM (long) — Robert Feldt <feldt@...>

Hi,

20 messages 2001/02/01
[#10364] Re: RFC: RubyVM (long) — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2001/02/05

[#10708] Suggestion for threading model — Stephen White <spwhite@...>

I've been playing around with multi-threading. I notice that there are

11 messages 2001/02/11

[#10853] Re: RubyChangeRequest #U002: new proper name for Hash#indexes, Array#indexes — "Mike Wilson" <wmwilson01@...>

10 messages 2001/02/14

[#11037] to_s and << — "Brent Rowland" <tarod@...>

list = [1, 2.3, 'four', false]

15 messages 2001/02/18

[#11094] Re: Summary: RCR #U002 - proper new name fo r indexes — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>

> On Mon, 19 Feb 2001, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

12 messages 2001/02/19

[#11131] Re: Summary: RCR #U002 - proper new name fo r indexes — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneik@...>

Robert Feldt wrote:

10 messages 2001/02/19

[#11251] Programming Ruby is now online — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

36 messages 2001/02/21

[#11469] XML-RPC and KDE — schuerig@... (Michael Schuerig)

23 messages 2001/02/24
[#11490] Re: XML-RPC and KDE — schuerig@... (Michael Schuerig) 2001/02/24

Michael Neumann <neumann@s-direktnet.de> wrote:

[#11491] Negative Reviews for Ruby and Programming Ruby — Jim Freeze <jim@...> 2001/02/24

Hi all:

[#11633] RCR: shortcut for instance variable initialization — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

13 messages 2001/02/26

[#11652] RE: RCR: shortcut for instance variable initialization — Michael Davis <mdavis@...>

I like it!

14 messages 2001/02/27

[#11700] Starting Once Again — Ron Jeffries <ronjeffries@...>

OK, I'm starting again with Ruby. I'm just assuming that I've

31 messages 2001/02/27
[#11712] RE: Starting Once Again — "Aaron Hinni" <aaron@...> 2001/02/27

> 2. So far I think running under TextPad will be better than running

[#11726] Re: Starting Once Again — Aleksi Niemel<zak@...> 2001/02/28

On Wed, 28 Feb 2001, Aaron Hinni wrote:

[ruby-talk:11123] Re: Auto-magically determine your class/method in Ruby

From: Bryan Zarnett <bryan_zarnett@...>
Date: 2001-02-19 17:13:59 UTC
List: ruby-talk #11123
I agree, having the calling class as part of caller
would be great. Having the line number their is an
excellent bonus!!!

B.



--- Robert Feldt <feldt@ce.chalmers.se> wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Feb 2001, Dave Thomas wrote:
> 
> > Bryan Zarnett <bryan_zarnett@yahoo.ca> writes:
> > 
> > > Is their a way to auto-magically determine the
> class
> > > and method that called an operation in another
> class.
> > > For example, I have a logger class that would
> like to
> > > embed in the output line the Class and operation
> that
> > > logged a message. I don't want to have to pass
> this
> > > information as an argument if I have to.
> > 
> > This is Ruby. Of _course_ there is... :)
> > 
> > <Dave's nice solution...>
> >
> See, I told you. I never should have posted... :-)
> 
> BTW, wouldn't it be nicer if Kernel#caller included
> the calling object and
> method? First time I encoutered it (the name) that's
> what I thought it
> did.
> 
> /R
> 


_______________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.ca address at http://mail.yahoo.ca

In This Thread