[#10209] Market for XML Web stuff — Matt Sergeant <matt@...>

I'm trying to get a handle on what the size of the market for AxKit would be

15 messages 2001/02/01

[#10238] RFC: RubyVM (long) — Robert Feldt <feldt@...>

Hi,

20 messages 2001/02/01
[#10364] Re: RFC: RubyVM (long) — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2001/02/05

[#10708] Suggestion for threading model — Stephen White <spwhite@...>

I've been playing around with multi-threading. I notice that there are

11 messages 2001/02/11

[#10853] Re: RubyChangeRequest #U002: new proper name for Hash#indexes, Array#indexes — "Mike Wilson" <wmwilson01@...>

10 messages 2001/02/14

[#11037] to_s and << — "Brent Rowland" <tarod@...>

list = [1, 2.3, 'four', false]

15 messages 2001/02/18

[#11094] Re: Summary: RCR #U002 - proper new name fo r indexes — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>

> On Mon, 19 Feb 2001, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

12 messages 2001/02/19

[#11131] Re: Summary: RCR #U002 - proper new name fo r indexes — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneik@...>

Robert Feldt wrote:

10 messages 2001/02/19

[#11251] Programming Ruby is now online — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

36 messages 2001/02/21

[#11469] XML-RPC and KDE — schuerig@... (Michael Schuerig)

23 messages 2001/02/24
[#11490] Re: XML-RPC and KDE — schuerig@... (Michael Schuerig) 2001/02/24

Michael Neumann <neumann@s-direktnet.de> wrote:

[#11491] Negative Reviews for Ruby and Programming Ruby — Jim Freeze <jim@...> 2001/02/24

Hi all:

[#11633] RCR: shortcut for instance variable initialization — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

13 messages 2001/02/26

[#11652] RE: RCR: shortcut for instance variable initialization — Michael Davis <mdavis@...>

I like it!

14 messages 2001/02/27

[#11700] Starting Once Again — Ron Jeffries <ronjeffries@...>

OK, I'm starting again with Ruby. I'm just assuming that I've

31 messages 2001/02/27
[#11712] RE: Starting Once Again — "Aaron Hinni" <aaron@...> 2001/02/27

> 2. So far I think running under TextPad will be better than running

[#11726] Re: Starting Once Again — Aleksi Niemel<zak@...> 2001/02/28

On Wed, 28 Feb 2001, Aaron Hinni wrote:

[ruby-talk:11008] Re: Ruby/Tk, what am I doing wrong... [long answer]

From: "jkaurin" <jkaurin@...>
Date: 2001-02-17 05:40:02 UTC
List: ruby-talk #11008
This, nesting blocks, was the cause of my confusion with grid also (see
02/14/2001 thread). Nested blocks keep putting the widgets top-to-bottom
rather than the grid pattern I was specifying.

I now notice that the pickaxe book uses parenthesis  for all of its examples
(Ruby Tk Chapter) except for the first very basic example.

Has anyone supplied a definitive answer to this question?

> >Similarly...
> >
> >TkEntry.new(@window) {
> >      pack('side' => 'left')
> >}
> >TkButton.new(@window) {
> >      pack('side' => 'left')
> >}
> >
> >correctly puts the two side by side left to right, however
> >
> >TkEntry.new(@window) {
> >      pack {side 'left'}
> >}
> >TkButton.new(@window) {
> >      pack {side 'left}
> >}
> >
> >puts the two items top to bottom.
>
> This is because you can't nest the "block" notation with the "pack"
method.
> I don't have an explanation for why this doesn't work, but as far as I can
> tell, it does not work.  I've just resigned myself to using the
parenthesized
> form.  What is happening is that the 'pack' method is being passed no
> arguments at all, and so the default behavior (top to bottom packing) is
> occuring.
>
>
> >The pickaxe book implies that in both cases the two forms should be
> >equivalent.  What am I doing wrong?
>
> Maybe someone will shed light on this last question and englighten both
> of us. =)
>
> Jeremy


In This Thread