[#10209] Market for XML Web stuff — Matt Sergeant <matt@...>

I'm trying to get a handle on what the size of the market for AxKit would be

15 messages 2001/02/01

[#10238] RFC: RubyVM (long) — Robert Feldt <feldt@...>

Hi,

20 messages 2001/02/01
[#10364] Re: RFC: RubyVM (long) — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2001/02/05

[#10708] Suggestion for threading model — Stephen White <spwhite@...>

I've been playing around with multi-threading. I notice that there are

11 messages 2001/02/11

[#10853] Re: RubyChangeRequest #U002: new proper name for Hash#indexes, Array#indexes — "Mike Wilson" <wmwilson01@...>

10 messages 2001/02/14

[#11037] to_s and << — "Brent Rowland" <tarod@...>

list = [1, 2.3, 'four', false]

15 messages 2001/02/18

[#11094] Re: Summary: RCR #U002 - proper new name fo r indexes — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>

> On Mon, 19 Feb 2001, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

12 messages 2001/02/19

[#11131] Re: Summary: RCR #U002 - proper new name fo r indexes — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneik@...>

Robert Feldt wrote:

10 messages 2001/02/19

[#11251] Programming Ruby is now online — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

36 messages 2001/02/21

[#11469] XML-RPC and KDE — schuerig@... (Michael Schuerig)

23 messages 2001/02/24
[#11490] Re: XML-RPC and KDE — schuerig@... (Michael Schuerig) 2001/02/24

Michael Neumann <neumann@s-direktnet.de> wrote:

[#11491] Negative Reviews for Ruby and Programming Ruby — Jim Freeze <jim@...> 2001/02/24

Hi all:

[#11633] RCR: shortcut for instance variable initialization — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

13 messages 2001/02/26

[#11652] RE: RCR: shortcut for instance variable initialization — Michael Davis <mdavis@...>

I like it!

14 messages 2001/02/27

[#11700] Starting Once Again — Ron Jeffries <ronjeffries@...>

OK, I'm starting again with Ruby. I'm just assuming that I've

31 messages 2001/02/27
[#11712] RE: Starting Once Again — "Aaron Hinni" <aaron@...> 2001/02/27

> 2. So far I think running under TextPad will be better than running

[#11726] Re: Starting Once Again — Aleksi Niemel<zak@...> 2001/02/28

On Wed, 28 Feb 2001, Aaron Hinni wrote:

[ruby-talk:10549] Giving a Proc utility methods?

From: "Ben Tilly" <ben_tilly@...>
Date: 2001-02-08 06:38:17 UTC
List: ruby-talk #10549
Here is my situation.  I have a class, call it Foo.
Foo has an attribute which is a callback.  I want to
have this callback be in the caller's context, but
there are some utility functions that I want to make
readily available.

Note that I am well aware of how to make this work
with an instance eval, but I don't want to do that
because I want to preserve the closure.

My first naive thought was to make those functions
methods in my current class.  Which doesn't work
since I have an object of another class.  (Duh, what
did I expect?)

My second, less naive, thought was to make those
functions private methods of the object.  That fails
in a way which is somewhat reasonable, I guess, but
still makes me aware that I don't understand how it
is working internally.  In particular my method is
called but generates an exception because it is a
private method.  But I can't seem to figure out how
to say that I really want it to be public after
all. :-(

I guess I could make them available in a module to
be mixed in by anyone wishing to use the class, but
I was hoping that there was a nicer approach.

Here is a sample of what I hoped would work in the
hopes that there is a simple solution I have missed:

    class Foo
      attr :err

      def initialize (&meth)
        # TRY to add the method?
        def meth.fail (msg)
          puts msg
        end
        @err = meth
      end

      def throw_err (msg)
        @err[msg]
      end
    end

    # I want to preserve this closure...
    bar = "testing..."

    # Example showing the callback works
    my_foo = Foo.new {|msg| puts msg + bar}
    my_foo.throw_err "Trial 1: "

    # Example of what I *wanted* to do...
    my_foo = Foo.new {|msg| self.fail msg + bar}
    my_foo.throw_err "Trial 2: "

(What I really wanted to do was not puts the error, but
rather throw it, and I didn't want synchronization
problems between what I label the throw and the catch
so I only wanted to define those once.)

Cheers,
Ben
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com

In This Thread

Prev Next