[#10209] Market for XML Web stuff — Matt Sergeant <matt@...>

I'm trying to get a handle on what the size of the market for AxKit would be

15 messages 2001/02/01

[#10238] RFC: RubyVM (long) — Robert Feldt <feldt@...>

Hi,

20 messages 2001/02/01
[#10364] Re: RFC: RubyVM (long) — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2001/02/05

[#10708] Suggestion for threading model — Stephen White <spwhite@...>

I've been playing around with multi-threading. I notice that there are

11 messages 2001/02/11

[#10853] Re: RubyChangeRequest #U002: new proper name for Hash#indexes, Array#indexes — "Mike Wilson" <wmwilson01@...>

10 messages 2001/02/14

[#11037] to_s and << — "Brent Rowland" <tarod@...>

list = [1, 2.3, 'four', false]

15 messages 2001/02/18

[#11094] Re: Summary: RCR #U002 - proper new name fo r indexes — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>

> On Mon, 19 Feb 2001, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

12 messages 2001/02/19

[#11131] Re: Summary: RCR #U002 - proper new name fo r indexes — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneik@...>

Robert Feldt wrote:

10 messages 2001/02/19

[#11251] Programming Ruby is now online — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

36 messages 2001/02/21

[#11469] XML-RPC and KDE — schuerig@... (Michael Schuerig)

23 messages 2001/02/24
[#11490] Re: XML-RPC and KDE — schuerig@... (Michael Schuerig) 2001/02/24

Michael Neumann <neumann@s-direktnet.de> wrote:

[#11491] Negative Reviews for Ruby and Programming Ruby — Jim Freeze <jim@...> 2001/02/24

Hi all:

[#11633] RCR: shortcut for instance variable initialization — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

13 messages 2001/02/26

[#11652] RE: RCR: shortcut for instance variable initialization — Michael Davis <mdavis@...>

I like it!

14 messages 2001/02/27

[#11700] Starting Once Again — Ron Jeffries <ronjeffries@...>

OK, I'm starting again with Ruby. I'm just assuming that I've

31 messages 2001/02/27
[#11712] RE: Starting Once Again — "Aaron Hinni" <aaron@...> 2001/02/27

> 2. So far I think running under TextPad will be better than running

[#11726] Re: Starting Once Again — Aleksi Niemel<zak@...> 2001/02/28

On Wed, 28 Feb 2001, Aaron Hinni wrote:

[ruby-talk:11359] Re: Array bugs?

From: Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...>
Date: 2001-02-23 02:08:19 UTC
List: ruby-talk #11359
On Fri, 23 Feb 2001, Eugene Ventimiglia wrote:
> > A similar problem is for loopless graphs. Try the following:
> > def f(x); [x,x]; end
> > def g(x); f f f f f f f f x; end
> > (g g g 1) == (g g g 1) #=> true
> > This seems normal, but it takes 33 million comparisons, even though each
> > side of the equality has only 25 objects !!!
> Forgive me if I'm misreading this, but doesn't g(x) produce 512 objects?

No, it produces a chain of 8 arrays where each has two links to the
following one (the last one has two links to x). So there are 256 ways of
getting to x through the result of g(x).

(g g g 1) is a chain of 24 arrays, where you may take 256*256*256
different paths to the number 1. There are 48 array cells total, 46 of
which pointing to arrays and 2 containing the number 1. 

The comparison 1==1 is done 2**24 times, the last array comparisons are
done 2**23 times, ... the first array comparison is done 2**0 times.

This is sum(0..24) {|x| 2**x } comparisons. This may be written
"1 11111111 11111111 11111111" in binary, which is 2**25 - 1.

> irb(main):003:0> f f 1
> [[1, 1], [1, 1]]

You see here one array pointing twice to the same array pointing twice to
the number 1. Of course, performing an eval on that will give you 3
arrays, not two.

matju

In This Thread

Prev Next