[#10209] Market for XML Web stuff — Matt Sergeant <matt@...>

I'm trying to get a handle on what the size of the market for AxKit would be

15 messages 2001/02/01

[#10238] RFC: RubyVM (long) — Robert Feldt <feldt@...>

Hi,

20 messages 2001/02/01
[#10364] Re: RFC: RubyVM (long) — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2001/02/05

[#10708] Suggestion for threading model — Stephen White <spwhite@...>

I've been playing around with multi-threading. I notice that there are

11 messages 2001/02/11

[#10853] Re: RubyChangeRequest #U002: new proper name for Hash#indexes, Array#indexes — "Mike Wilson" <wmwilson01@...>

10 messages 2001/02/14

[#11037] to_s and << — "Brent Rowland" <tarod@...>

list = [1, 2.3, 'four', false]

15 messages 2001/02/18

[#11094] Re: Summary: RCR #U002 - proper new name fo r indexes — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>

> On Mon, 19 Feb 2001, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

12 messages 2001/02/19

[#11131] Re: Summary: RCR #U002 - proper new name fo r indexes — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneik@...>

Robert Feldt wrote:

10 messages 2001/02/19

[#11251] Programming Ruby is now online — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

36 messages 2001/02/21

[#11469] XML-RPC and KDE — schuerig@... (Michael Schuerig)

23 messages 2001/02/24
[#11490] Re: XML-RPC and KDE — schuerig@... (Michael Schuerig) 2001/02/24

Michael Neumann <neumann@s-direktnet.de> wrote:

[#11491] Negative Reviews for Ruby and Programming Ruby — Jim Freeze <jim@...> 2001/02/24

Hi all:

[#11633] RCR: shortcut for instance variable initialization — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

13 messages 2001/02/26

[#11652] RE: RCR: shortcut for instance variable initialization — Michael Davis <mdavis@...>

I like it!

14 messages 2001/02/27

[#11700] Starting Once Again — Ron Jeffries <ronjeffries@...>

OK, I'm starting again with Ruby. I'm just assuming that I've

31 messages 2001/02/27
[#11712] RE: Starting Once Again — "Aaron Hinni" <aaron@...> 2001/02/27

> 2. So far I think running under TextPad will be better than running

[#11726] Re: Starting Once Again — Aleksi Niemel<zak@...> 2001/02/28

On Wed, 28 Feb 2001, Aaron Hinni wrote:

[ruby-talk:11640] Re: Net::FTP

From: Ernest Ellingson <erne@...>
Date: 2001-02-27 00:52:18 UTC
List: ruby-talk #11640
I'm running ruby 1.6.2 on Windows 2000 and on Windows NT service pack 4.

I've had no problems running Net::FTP, Net:HTTP and I am using some other 
socket applications.  The only little problem I ran into was on Windows 
NT.  Same problem on several machines using recvfrom.  Although I supplied 
a byte count to read.  The function returned without reading that number of 
bytes.  Another call to recvfrom with the remaining bytes (calculated as 
the difference between the bytes read and the required bytes read cured 
that problem).

Of course I'm not using cygwin.

Ernie
At 07:10 2/27/2001 +0900, you wrote:
>"Patrick Down" <pdown@austin.rr.com> writes:
>
> > This seems to be a problem in The TCPSocket object open method but
> > being completely new to ruby Can any tell me what I am doing wrong?
>
>Sockets are currently broken under Windows 2000 at least; they may be
>broken under all Win32 platforms, but I haven't heard any evidence
>either way.
>
>I'm just beginning to look at the code in question.  If you have
>experience hacking Cygwin net code, you may wish to take a look
>yourself.
>
>--
>Jonathan Feinberg   jdf@pobox.com   Sunny Brooklyn, NY
>http://pobox.com/~jdf

In This Thread