[#10209] Market for XML Web stuff — Matt Sergeant <matt@...>

I'm trying to get a handle on what the size of the market for AxKit would be

15 messages 2001/02/01

[#10238] RFC: RubyVM (long) — Robert Feldt <feldt@...>

Hi,

20 messages 2001/02/01
[#10364] Re: RFC: RubyVM (long) — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2001/02/05

[#10708] Suggestion for threading model — Stephen White <spwhite@...>

I've been playing around with multi-threading. I notice that there are

11 messages 2001/02/11

[#10853] Re: RubyChangeRequest #U002: new proper name for Hash#indexes, Array#indexes — "Mike Wilson" <wmwilson01@...>

10 messages 2001/02/14

[#11037] to_s and << — "Brent Rowland" <tarod@...>

list = [1, 2.3, 'four', false]

15 messages 2001/02/18

[#11094] Re: Summary: RCR #U002 - proper new name fo r indexes — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>

> On Mon, 19 Feb 2001, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

12 messages 2001/02/19

[#11131] Re: Summary: RCR #U002 - proper new name fo r indexes — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneik@...>

Robert Feldt wrote:

10 messages 2001/02/19

[#11251] Programming Ruby is now online — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

36 messages 2001/02/21

[#11469] XML-RPC and KDE — schuerig@... (Michael Schuerig)

23 messages 2001/02/24
[#11490] Re: XML-RPC and KDE — schuerig@... (Michael Schuerig) 2001/02/24

Michael Neumann <neumann@s-direktnet.de> wrote:

[#11491] Negative Reviews for Ruby and Programming Ruby — Jim Freeze <jim@...> 2001/02/24

Hi all:

[#11633] RCR: shortcut for instance variable initialization — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

13 messages 2001/02/26

[#11652] RE: RCR: shortcut for instance variable initialization — Michael Davis <mdavis@...>

I like it!

14 messages 2001/02/27

[#11700] Starting Once Again — Ron Jeffries <ronjeffries@...>

OK, I'm starting again with Ruby. I'm just assuming that I've

31 messages 2001/02/27
[#11712] RE: Starting Once Again — "Aaron Hinni" <aaron@...> 2001/02/27

> 2. So far I think running under TextPad will be better than running

[#11726] Re: Starting Once Again — Aleksi Niemel<zak@...> 2001/02/28

On Wed, 28 Feb 2001, Aaron Hinni wrote:

[ruby-talk:11129] Re: Auto-magically determine your class/method in Ruby

From: Bryan Zarnett <bryan_zarnett@...>
Date: 2001-02-19 19:10:08 UTC
List: ruby-talk #11129
My caller only version is regex nasty and relies upon
the thought that only one class per file and that the
class and file are the same names. Although if you
want to base it on class versus file than you would
not care.

Here was my idea:

stackLine =  caller(1)[0]
stackLine=~/(\w*)\.rb\:(\w*)\:\s*in\s*\`(\w*)'/
# Where 1=file/class name, 2=line number, 3=method
eventLine =  "#{$1} #{$3}(#{$2}) - [#{Time.new}]
\"#{message}\" #{logType} -\n"




--- Robert Feldt <feldt@ce.chalmers.se> wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Feb 2001, Bryan Zarnett wrote:
> 
> > I agree, having the calling class as part of
> caller
> > would be great. Having the line number their is an
> > excellent bonus!!!
> > 
> BTW, here's my solution. Difference to Daves
> solution is that it doesn't
> require any change to the caller. But it might not
> work if you've got
> other trace functions installed and its uglier.
> Anyway:
> 
> def calling_object(&b)
>   set_trace_func proc{ |event, file, line, id,
> binding, classname|
>     case event
>     when "return"
>       if !(id == :calling_object or classname ==
> self.type)
> 	b.call(id, classname, file, line)
> 	set_trace_func(nil) # Restore old trace_func?!
>       end
>     end
>   }
> end
> 
> class Callee
>   def m1
>     calling_object { |method, klass, file, line|
>       puts "Callee#m1 called from #{klass}##{method}
> on line #{line} in
> file #{file}"
>     }
>   end
> end
> 
> class Caller
>   def m
>     Callee.new.m1
>   end
> end
> 
> Caller.new.m
> 
> and here's the output:
> 
> $ ruby -v calling_object.rb
> ruby 1.7.0 (2001-01-23) [i686-cygwin]
> Callee#m1 called from Caller#m on line 23 in file
> calling_object.rb
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Robert
> 


_______________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.ca address at http://mail.yahoo.ca

In This Thread

Prev Next