[#10209] Market for XML Web stuff — Matt Sergeant <matt@...>

I'm trying to get a handle on what the size of the market for AxKit would be

15 messages 2001/02/01

[#10238] RFC: RubyVM (long) — Robert Feldt <feldt@...>

Hi,

20 messages 2001/02/01
[#10364] Re: RFC: RubyVM (long) — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2001/02/05

[#10708] Suggestion for threading model — Stephen White <spwhite@...>

I've been playing around with multi-threading. I notice that there are

11 messages 2001/02/11

[#10853] Re: RubyChangeRequest #U002: new proper name for Hash#indexes, Array#indexes — "Mike Wilson" <wmwilson01@...>

10 messages 2001/02/14

[#11037] to_s and << — "Brent Rowland" <tarod@...>

list = [1, 2.3, 'four', false]

15 messages 2001/02/18

[#11094] Re: Summary: RCR #U002 - proper new name fo r indexes — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>

> On Mon, 19 Feb 2001, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

12 messages 2001/02/19

[#11131] Re: Summary: RCR #U002 - proper new name fo r indexes — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneik@...>

Robert Feldt wrote:

10 messages 2001/02/19

[#11251] Programming Ruby is now online — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

36 messages 2001/02/21

[#11469] XML-RPC and KDE — schuerig@... (Michael Schuerig)

23 messages 2001/02/24
[#11490] Re: XML-RPC and KDE — schuerig@... (Michael Schuerig) 2001/02/24

Michael Neumann <neumann@s-direktnet.de> wrote:

[#11491] Negative Reviews for Ruby and Programming Ruby — Jim Freeze <jim@...> 2001/02/24

Hi all:

[#11633] RCR: shortcut for instance variable initialization — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

13 messages 2001/02/26

[#11652] RE: RCR: shortcut for instance variable initialization — Michael Davis <mdavis@...>

I like it!

14 messages 2001/02/27

[#11700] Starting Once Again — Ron Jeffries <ronjeffries@...>

OK, I'm starting again with Ruby. I'm just assuming that I've

31 messages 2001/02/27
[#11712] RE: Starting Once Again — "Aaron Hinni" <aaron@...> 2001/02/27

> 2. So far I think running under TextPad will be better than running

[#11726] Re: Starting Once Again — Aleksi Niemel<zak@...> 2001/02/28

On Wed, 28 Feb 2001, Aaron Hinni wrote:

[ruby-talk:10829] Re: Even Tcl/Tk goes ActiveSTATE

From: Jeffrey Hobbs <JeffH@...>
Date: 2001-02-14 06:40:03 UTC
List: ruby-talk #10829
Conrad Schneiker wrote:
> 
> Franz GEIGER wrote:
> 
> # Subject: Even Tcl/Tk goes ActiveSTATE
> 
> "Even Tcl/Tk ...."?  Better be a bit more careful about how you talk
> about the people who are now in a position to invite you into their
> exclusive little club. :-) The least you could say is that this is

;^)   See below

> potentially great news for keeping Ruby/Tk viable.

I thought Ruby's language binding to Tk was complete.  I always have
an open ear (or email box), although I have to admit I know nothing
about the Ruby innards (Tk, OTOH, is a good friend).

> # Tcl/Tk goes ActiveSTATE (see below). Shouldn't Ruby go ActiveSTATE
> # too?
> 
> Sure (albeit cautiously so). But what would that involve in practice?
> Likely that they would need to hire at least one very strong
> low-level Ruby developer, and maybe take on Matz and the pragmatic

Well, one developer with confident knowledge of low-level Ruby would
suffice to start.  The key is that relocation to Vancouver, BC would be
something important.  If someone is interested, they can send me mail
(please CC, as I'm undergoing the move to Vancouver myself right now).

-- 
  Jeff Hobbs                     The Tcl Guy
  Senior Developer               http://www.ActiveState.com/

In This Thread

Prev Next