[#10209] Market for XML Web stuff — Matt Sergeant <matt@...>

I'm trying to get a handle on what the size of the market for AxKit would be

15 messages 2001/02/01

[#10238] RFC: RubyVM (long) — Robert Feldt <feldt@...>

Hi,

20 messages 2001/02/01
[#10364] Re: RFC: RubyVM (long) — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2001/02/05

[#10708] Suggestion for threading model — Stephen White <spwhite@...>

I've been playing around with multi-threading. I notice that there are

11 messages 2001/02/11

[#10853] Re: RubyChangeRequest #U002: new proper name for Hash#indexes, Array#indexes — "Mike Wilson" <wmwilson01@...>

10 messages 2001/02/14

[#11037] to_s and << — "Brent Rowland" <tarod@...>

list = [1, 2.3, 'four', false]

15 messages 2001/02/18

[#11094] Re: Summary: RCR #U002 - proper new name fo r indexes — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>

> On Mon, 19 Feb 2001, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

12 messages 2001/02/19

[#11131] Re: Summary: RCR #U002 - proper new name fo r indexes — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneik@...>

Robert Feldt wrote:

10 messages 2001/02/19

[#11251] Programming Ruby is now online — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

36 messages 2001/02/21

[#11469] XML-RPC and KDE — schuerig@... (Michael Schuerig)

23 messages 2001/02/24
[#11490] Re: XML-RPC and KDE — schuerig@... (Michael Schuerig) 2001/02/24

Michael Neumann <neumann@s-direktnet.de> wrote:

[#11491] Negative Reviews for Ruby and Programming Ruby — Jim Freeze <jim@...> 2001/02/24

Hi all:

[#11633] RCR: shortcut for instance variable initialization — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

13 messages 2001/02/26

[#11652] RE: RCR: shortcut for instance variable initialization — Michael Davis <mdavis@...>

I like it!

14 messages 2001/02/27

[#11700] Starting Once Again — Ron Jeffries <ronjeffries@...>

OK, I'm starting again with Ruby. I'm just assuming that I've

31 messages 2001/02/27
[#11712] RE: Starting Once Again — "Aaron Hinni" <aaron@...> 2001/02/27

> 2. So far I think running under TextPad will be better than running

[#11726] Re: Starting Once Again — Aleksi Niemel<zak@...> 2001/02/28

On Wed, 28 Feb 2001, Aaron Hinni wrote:

[ruby-talk:11397] Re: Time without seconds (updated/fixed)

From: David Alan Black <dblack@...>
Date: 2001-02-23 18:15:11 UTC
List: ruby-talk #11397
On Sat, 24 Feb 2001, W. Kent Starr wrote:

> On Friday 23 February 2001 10:32, David Alan Black wrote:
> > Here's a followup question, based on playing around with this:
> > Why do the two ways of doing this (which I've stashed into
> > MyTime.floor) result in objects of different types?
> >
> >   class MyTime < Time
> >     def MyTime.floor
> >
> >   # Way 1
> >       t = Time.new
> >       mt = MyTime.at t - t.sec
> >
> >   # Way 2
> >       tt = MyTime.at (tm = Time.new) - tm.sec
> >
> >       [mt,tt].each do |ti|
> >         puts "#{ti} is of type #{ti.type}"
> >       end
> >     end
> >   end
> >
> >   MyTime.floor
> >
> >   Output:
> >   Fri Feb 23 10:31:00 EST 2001 is of type MyTime
> >   Fri Feb 23 10:31:00 EST 2001 is of type Time
> >
> >
> FWIW
> 
> Time.type #-> Class
> class MyTime < Time
> end
> MyTime.type #-> Class
> a = Time.new
> b = MyTime.new
> a.type #-> Time
> b.type #-> MyTime
> 
> It appears that a class is of type Class and instances of that class are of 
> type #{Name_Of_That_Class}
> 
> Interesting (and useful) behavior :-)

Indispensable, even :-)  But I don't see the connection with my question.  But see
earlier answers from Dave T. and Guy D.

(Is there *anyone* on this list without at least one name twin?  Slight exaggeration...
but still!)


David

-- 
David Alan Black
home: dblack@candle.superlink.net
work: blackdav@shu.edu
Web:  http://pirate.shu.edu/~blackdav


In This Thread