[#10209] Market for XML Web stuff — Matt Sergeant <matt@...>

I'm trying to get a handle on what the size of the market for AxKit would be

15 messages 2001/02/01

[#10238] RFC: RubyVM (long) — Robert Feldt <feldt@...>

Hi,

20 messages 2001/02/01
[#10364] Re: RFC: RubyVM (long) — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2001/02/05

[#10708] Suggestion for threading model — Stephen White <spwhite@...>

I've been playing around with multi-threading. I notice that there are

11 messages 2001/02/11

[#10853] Re: RubyChangeRequest #U002: new proper name for Hash#indexes, Array#indexes — "Mike Wilson" <wmwilson01@...>

10 messages 2001/02/14

[#11037] to_s and << — "Brent Rowland" <tarod@...>

list = [1, 2.3, 'four', false]

15 messages 2001/02/18

[#11094] Re: Summary: RCR #U002 - proper new name fo r indexes — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>

> On Mon, 19 Feb 2001, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

12 messages 2001/02/19

[#11131] Re: Summary: RCR #U002 - proper new name fo r indexes — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneik@...>

Robert Feldt wrote:

10 messages 2001/02/19

[#11251] Programming Ruby is now online — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

36 messages 2001/02/21

[#11469] XML-RPC and KDE — schuerig@... (Michael Schuerig)

23 messages 2001/02/24
[#11490] Re: XML-RPC and KDE — schuerig@... (Michael Schuerig) 2001/02/24

Michael Neumann <neumann@s-direktnet.de> wrote:

[#11491] Negative Reviews for Ruby and Programming Ruby — Jim Freeze <jim@...> 2001/02/24

Hi all:

[#11633] RCR: shortcut for instance variable initialization — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

13 messages 2001/02/26

[#11652] RE: RCR: shortcut for instance variable initialization — Michael Davis <mdavis@...>

I like it!

14 messages 2001/02/27

[#11700] Starting Once Again — Ron Jeffries <ronjeffries@...>

OK, I'm starting again with Ruby. I'm just assuming that I've

31 messages 2001/02/27
[#11712] RE: Starting Once Again — "Aaron Hinni" <aaron@...> 2001/02/27

> 2. So far I think running under TextPad will be better than running

[#11726] Re: Starting Once Again — Aleksi Niemel<zak@...> 2001/02/28

On Wed, 28 Feb 2001, Aaron Hinni wrote:

[ruby-talk:11358] Re: binding to callers namespace.

From: Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
Date: 2001-02-23 01:33:06 UTC
List: ruby-talk #11358
"Joseph McDonald" <joe@vpop.net> writes:

> Am I using caller wrong here?

'fraid so.  Caller returns an array containing the call stack, not the 
object that is the caller.

You _could_ do something similar to what you want though, using
eval. The code below shows two ways to get the binding: both involve
cooperation on behalf of the caller:

     class Object
       public :binding
     end

     class Display
       def initialize(aBinding)
         @binding = aBinding
       end
       def render
         puts "secret is #{eval '@secret', @binding } var is #{eval 'var',@binding}"
       end
     end

     class Display2
       def render(&binding)
         puts "secret is #{eval '@secret', binding } var is #{eval 'var', binding}"
       end
     end

     class Demo 
       def initialize(n) 
         @secret = n 
       end 

       def display
         var = "asdf"
         d = Display.new(binding)
         d.render # want to give it access to @secret and "var"

         d = Display2.new
         d.render {}
       end
     end 

     k1 = Demo.new(99) 
     k1.display


However, you might want to think about alternative designs to get the
same effect... this is going to get messy pretty quickly :)


Regards


Dave

In This Thread