[#10209] Market for XML Web stuff — Matt Sergeant <matt@...>

I'm trying to get a handle on what the size of the market for AxKit would be

15 messages 2001/02/01

[#10238] RFC: RubyVM (long) — Robert Feldt <feldt@...>

Hi,

20 messages 2001/02/01
[#10364] Re: RFC: RubyVM (long) — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2001/02/05

[#10708] Suggestion for threading model — Stephen White <spwhite@...>

I've been playing around with multi-threading. I notice that there are

11 messages 2001/02/11

[#10853] Re: RubyChangeRequest #U002: new proper name for Hash#indexes, Array#indexes — "Mike Wilson" <wmwilson01@...>

10 messages 2001/02/14

[#11037] to_s and << — "Brent Rowland" <tarod@...>

list = [1, 2.3, 'four', false]

15 messages 2001/02/18

[#11094] Re: Summary: RCR #U002 - proper new name fo r indexes — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>

> On Mon, 19 Feb 2001, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

12 messages 2001/02/19

[#11131] Re: Summary: RCR #U002 - proper new name fo r indexes — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneik@...>

Robert Feldt wrote:

10 messages 2001/02/19

[#11251] Programming Ruby is now online — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

36 messages 2001/02/21

[#11469] XML-RPC and KDE — schuerig@... (Michael Schuerig)

23 messages 2001/02/24
[#11490] Re: XML-RPC and KDE — schuerig@... (Michael Schuerig) 2001/02/24

Michael Neumann <neumann@s-direktnet.de> wrote:

[#11491] Negative Reviews for Ruby and Programming Ruby — Jim Freeze <jim@...> 2001/02/24

Hi all:

[#11633] RCR: shortcut for instance variable initialization — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

13 messages 2001/02/26

[#11652] RE: RCR: shortcut for instance variable initialization — Michael Davis <mdavis@...>

I like it!

14 messages 2001/02/27

[#11700] Starting Once Again — Ron Jeffries <ronjeffries@...>

OK, I'm starting again with Ruby. I'm just assuming that I've

31 messages 2001/02/27
[#11712] RE: Starting Once Again — "Aaron Hinni" <aaron@...> 2001/02/27

> 2. So far I think running under TextPad will be better than running

[#11726] Re: Starting Once Again — Aleksi Niemel<zak@...> 2001/02/28

On Wed, 28 Feb 2001, Aaron Hinni wrote:

[ruby-talk:10606] Re: (B. Tilly - read) Ruby in college coursework

From: "Ben Tilly" <ben_tilly@...>
Date: 2001-02-08 21:25:34 UTC
List: ruby-talk #10606
"Mike Wilson" <wmwilson01@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>From: Mark Slagell <ms@iastate.edu> wrote:
>>
>>Just ran across this today. It's only a matter of time before the
>>academic world seriously grasps ruby, I think.
>>
>>http://www.cs.rpi.edu/~musser/pl/project1.html
>
>Ben Tilly:
>If you haven't looked at this, it's basically a project to implement a
>recursive descent parser, with some examples.  Just thought you might be
>interested ;).

I was interested, but not as interested as I might be.

As I commented to someone privately, most hand-rolled
parsers are recursive descent.  I am therefore not
surprised that an exercise to handroll a parser would
be using recursive descent.

In any case their approach is rather different than
mine.  They are taking a single grammar and asking
for an OO program that parses it.  So their final
solution will likely have the grammar hard coded into
the parser.  I am trying to produce some somewhat more
general classes and then put them together in a way
that solves a useful problem.

Anyways I have my classes.  I have a test suite for
them.  I have my useful application laid out.  It is
now a question of just writing a test suite and the
example...

(It has helped that I have been sick for a couple of
days.  Not as much as a normal 2 days because I have
been busy being sick, but at least I wrote something.)

Cheers,
Ben
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com

In This Thread

Prev Next