[#10209] Market for XML Web stuff — Matt Sergeant <matt@...>

I'm trying to get a handle on what the size of the market for AxKit would be

15 messages 2001/02/01

[#10238] RFC: RubyVM (long) — Robert Feldt <feldt@...>

Hi,

20 messages 2001/02/01
[#10364] Re: RFC: RubyVM (long) — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2001/02/05

[#10708] Suggestion for threading model — Stephen White <spwhite@...>

I've been playing around with multi-threading. I notice that there are

11 messages 2001/02/11

[#10853] Re: RubyChangeRequest #U002: new proper name for Hash#indexes, Array#indexes — "Mike Wilson" <wmwilson01@...>

10 messages 2001/02/14

[#11037] to_s and << — "Brent Rowland" <tarod@...>

list = [1, 2.3, 'four', false]

15 messages 2001/02/18

[#11094] Re: Summary: RCR #U002 - proper new name fo r indexes — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>

> On Mon, 19 Feb 2001, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

12 messages 2001/02/19

[#11131] Re: Summary: RCR #U002 - proper new name fo r indexes — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneik@...>

Robert Feldt wrote:

10 messages 2001/02/19

[#11251] Programming Ruby is now online — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

36 messages 2001/02/21

[#11469] XML-RPC and KDE — schuerig@... (Michael Schuerig)

23 messages 2001/02/24
[#11490] Re: XML-RPC and KDE — schuerig@... (Michael Schuerig) 2001/02/24

Michael Neumann <neumann@s-direktnet.de> wrote:

[#11491] Negative Reviews for Ruby and Programming Ruby — Jim Freeze <jim@...> 2001/02/24

Hi all:

[#11633] RCR: shortcut for instance variable initialization — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

13 messages 2001/02/26

[#11652] RE: RCR: shortcut for instance variable initialization — Michael Davis <mdavis@...>

I like it!

14 messages 2001/02/27

[#11700] Starting Once Again — Ron Jeffries <ronjeffries@...>

OK, I'm starting again with Ruby. I'm just assuming that I've

31 messages 2001/02/27
[#11712] RE: Starting Once Again — "Aaron Hinni" <aaron@...> 2001/02/27

> 2. So far I think running under TextPad will be better than running

[#11726] Re: Starting Once Again — Aleksi Niemel<zak@...> 2001/02/28

On Wed, 28 Feb 2001, Aaron Hinni wrote:

[ruby-talk:11535] Re: Sorting

From: Kevin Smith <sent@...>
Date: 2001-02-25 15:17:16 UTC
List: ruby-talk #11535
Guy N. Hurst wrote:
>your code generates:
>["Name 1", "Name 10", "Name 100", "Name 101", 
>"Name 11", "Name 2", "Name 200", "Name 22"]
>
>If I add "[1]to_i" after each split, then it does things better...

Thanks for pointing this out. Of course you are 
correct. 

That's what I had intended to do, but I got so 
excited when the array <=> array just *worked* 
(before I looked it up in the book) that I forgot 
to continue coding until the task was done. (Now 
where did I put those unit tests again?)

>b = strings.sort do | a, b |
>        a.split[1].to_i <=> b.split[1].to_i
>end

>Of course, this is assuming there is a second element in the array after the split, and 
>that it is convertible to an integer.

Indeed. The original requirement was pretty 
vague. Prehaps the need was for each string to be 
sorted entirely, treating each word as a number 
where appropriate and text otherwise. In that 
case, I would write my own compare(array1, 
array2) method that did a split, and iterated 
through each word treating it appropriately.

It may not be as clever as the regex based 
solutions, but I prefer clear, simple brute force 
unless there's some requirement that forces me in 
a different direction.

Kevin

In This Thread

Prev Next