[#10209] Market for XML Web stuff — Matt Sergeant <matt@...>

I'm trying to get a handle on what the size of the market for AxKit would be

15 messages 2001/02/01

[#10238] RFC: RubyVM (long) — Robert Feldt <feldt@...>

Hi,

20 messages 2001/02/01
[#10364] Re: RFC: RubyVM (long) — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2001/02/05

[#10708] Suggestion for threading model — Stephen White <spwhite@...>

I've been playing around with multi-threading. I notice that there are

11 messages 2001/02/11

[#10853] Re: RubyChangeRequest #U002: new proper name for Hash#indexes, Array#indexes — "Mike Wilson" <wmwilson01@...>

10 messages 2001/02/14

[#11037] to_s and << — "Brent Rowland" <tarod@...>

list = [1, 2.3, 'four', false]

15 messages 2001/02/18

[#11094] Re: Summary: RCR #U002 - proper new name fo r indexes — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>

> On Mon, 19 Feb 2001, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

12 messages 2001/02/19

[#11131] Re: Summary: RCR #U002 - proper new name fo r indexes — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneik@...>

Robert Feldt wrote:

10 messages 2001/02/19

[#11251] Programming Ruby is now online — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

36 messages 2001/02/21

[#11469] XML-RPC and KDE — schuerig@... (Michael Schuerig)

23 messages 2001/02/24
[#11490] Re: XML-RPC and KDE — schuerig@... (Michael Schuerig) 2001/02/24

Michael Neumann <neumann@s-direktnet.de> wrote:

[#11491] Negative Reviews for Ruby and Programming Ruby — Jim Freeze <jim@...> 2001/02/24

Hi all:

[#11633] RCR: shortcut for instance variable initialization — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

13 messages 2001/02/26

[#11652] RE: RCR: shortcut for instance variable initialization — Michael Davis <mdavis@...>

I like it!

14 messages 2001/02/27

[#11700] Starting Once Again — Ron Jeffries <ronjeffries@...>

OK, I'm starting again with Ruby. I'm just assuming that I've

31 messages 2001/02/27
[#11712] RE: Starting Once Again — "Aaron Hinni" <aaron@...> 2001/02/27

> 2. So far I think running under TextPad will be better than running

[#11726] Re: Starting Once Again — Aleksi Niemel<zak@...> 2001/02/28

On Wed, 28 Feb 2001, Aaron Hinni wrote:

[ruby-talk:10924] Mashal.dump 10000 records, Marshal.load only reads 9939 records

From: Michael Davis <mdavis@...>
Date: 2001-02-15 19:07:19 UTC
List: ruby-talk #10924
I have provided a small ruby script to test Marshal dump and how efficient 
it is.  It Marshal.dumps 10000 arrays and then Marhsal.loads them back in. 
 The problem is that it only reads 9895 rows.  Is this a bug?  Can someone 
tell me where 105 of my rows went?

Here is the output from this script (on linux Red Hat 6.2 box) running with 
Ruby 1.6.1:

Time test (using Marshal dump on Array):
  It took 0.503368 seconds to insert 10000 rows
 - End of file reached
  It took 0.595172 seconds to count the rows (9895)

Here is the output running with Ruby 1.6.2:

Time test (using Marshal dump on Array):
  It took 0.471307 seconds to insert 10000 rows
 - End of file reached
  It took 0.589883 seconds to count the rows (9939)

Here is the Ruby script:

         print "\nTime test (using Marshal dump on Array):\n"
         fp = File.new("Membership.dmp", "w+")
         t = Time.now
         rows = 0
         1.upto(10000) do |i|
            data = [i, 'Davis', 'Michael', 0]
            Marshal.dump(data, fp)
            rows += 1
         end
         print "  It took #{Time.now - t} seconds to insert ", rows, " 
rows\n"
         t = Time.now
         count = 0
         rows = 0
         fp2 = File.new("Membership.dmp", "r+")
         begin
            1.upto(10000) do |i|
               data = Marshal.load(fp2)
               count += 1 if (data[0] > 9000)
               rows += 1
            end
         rescue      # we want to trap all errors and report them without 
failing
            print " - ", $!, "\n"
         end
         print "  It took #{Time.now - t} seconds to count the rows 
(#{rows})\n"


In This Thread

Prev Next