[#10209] Market for XML Web stuff — Matt Sergeant <matt@...>

I'm trying to get a handle on what the size of the market for AxKit would be

15 messages 2001/02/01

[#10238] RFC: RubyVM (long) — Robert Feldt <feldt@...>

Hi,

20 messages 2001/02/01
[#10364] Re: RFC: RubyVM (long) — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2001/02/05

[#10708] Suggestion for threading model — Stephen White <spwhite@...>

I've been playing around with multi-threading. I notice that there are

11 messages 2001/02/11

[#10853] Re: RubyChangeRequest #U002: new proper name for Hash#indexes, Array#indexes — "Mike Wilson" <wmwilson01@...>

10 messages 2001/02/14

[#11037] to_s and << — "Brent Rowland" <tarod@...>

list = [1, 2.3, 'four', false]

15 messages 2001/02/18

[#11094] Re: Summary: RCR #U002 - proper new name fo r indexes — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>

> On Mon, 19 Feb 2001, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

12 messages 2001/02/19

[#11131] Re: Summary: RCR #U002 - proper new name fo r indexes — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneik@...>

Robert Feldt wrote:

10 messages 2001/02/19

[#11251] Programming Ruby is now online — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

36 messages 2001/02/21

[#11469] XML-RPC and KDE — schuerig@... (Michael Schuerig)

23 messages 2001/02/24
[#11490] Re: XML-RPC and KDE — schuerig@... (Michael Schuerig) 2001/02/24

Michael Neumann <neumann@s-direktnet.de> wrote:

[#11491] Negative Reviews for Ruby and Programming Ruby — Jim Freeze <jim@...> 2001/02/24

Hi all:

[#11633] RCR: shortcut for instance variable initialization — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

13 messages 2001/02/26

[#11652] RE: RCR: shortcut for instance variable initialization — Michael Davis <mdavis@...>

I like it!

14 messages 2001/02/27

[#11700] Starting Once Again — Ron Jeffries <ronjeffries@...>

OK, I'm starting again with Ruby. I'm just assuming that I've

31 messages 2001/02/27
[#11712] RE: Starting Once Again — "Aaron Hinni" <aaron@...> 2001/02/27

> 2. So far I think running under TextPad will be better than running

[#11726] Re: Starting Once Again — Aleksi Niemel<zak@...> 2001/02/28

On Wed, 28 Feb 2001, Aaron Hinni wrote:

[ruby-talk:11580] Re: Time without seconds (updated/fixed)

From: ts <decoux@...>
Date: 2001-02-26 10:25:26 UTC
List: ruby-talk #11580
>>>>> "Y" == Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@zetabits.com> writes:

Y> Hmm, pretty complecated rules... Let me think.

 This is this :

pigeon% cat b.rb
#!/usr/bin/ruby
class Array
   def +(other)
      other = other.to_a unless other.kind_of? Array
      klass = Array
      if type <= other.type
         klass = other.type
      elsif other.type <= type
         klass = type
      end
      p klass
   end
end
 
class A < Array
end
class B < Array
end
class C < B
end
 
C[1] + C[1]
C[1] + B[1]
C[1] + A[1]
pigeon% 

pigeon% b.rb
C
B
Array
pigeon% 

 The advantage is that Array#+ can return a class which is not known at
 compile time.

 I don't think that it can break an old script, because with A[1] + A[1] it
 has actually an Array and with the modification it will have an A (which
 is also an Array).

 The *big* problem with this modification is that there are too many place
 where you must make the modification.

 This mean that when you make the modification, it's too easy to forget a
 modification and enter an inconsistence. This is why it's a bad idea.


Guy Decoux

In This Thread

Prev Next