[#10209] Market for XML Web stuff — Matt Sergeant <matt@...>

I'm trying to get a handle on what the size of the market for AxKit would be

15 messages 2001/02/01

[#10238] RFC: RubyVM (long) — Robert Feldt <feldt@...>

Hi,

20 messages 2001/02/01
[#10364] Re: RFC: RubyVM (long) — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2001/02/05

[#10708] Suggestion for threading model — Stephen White <spwhite@...>

I've been playing around with multi-threading. I notice that there are

11 messages 2001/02/11

[#10853] Re: RubyChangeRequest #U002: new proper name for Hash#indexes, Array#indexes — "Mike Wilson" <wmwilson01@...>

10 messages 2001/02/14

[#11037] to_s and << — "Brent Rowland" <tarod@...>

list = [1, 2.3, 'four', false]

15 messages 2001/02/18

[#11094] Re: Summary: RCR #U002 - proper new name fo r indexes — Aleksi Niemel<aleksi.niemela@...>

> On Mon, 19 Feb 2001, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

12 messages 2001/02/19

[#11131] Re: Summary: RCR #U002 - proper new name fo r indexes — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneik@...>

Robert Feldt wrote:

10 messages 2001/02/19

[#11251] Programming Ruby is now online — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

36 messages 2001/02/21

[#11469] XML-RPC and KDE — schuerig@... (Michael Schuerig)

23 messages 2001/02/24
[#11490] Re: XML-RPC and KDE — schuerig@... (Michael Schuerig) 2001/02/24

Michael Neumann <neumann@s-direktnet.de> wrote:

[#11491] Negative Reviews for Ruby and Programming Ruby — Jim Freeze <jim@...> 2001/02/24

Hi all:

[#11633] RCR: shortcut for instance variable initialization — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

13 messages 2001/02/26

[#11652] RE: RCR: shortcut for instance variable initialization — Michael Davis <mdavis@...>

I like it!

14 messages 2001/02/27

[#11700] Starting Once Again — Ron Jeffries <ronjeffries@...>

OK, I'm starting again with Ruby. I'm just assuming that I've

31 messages 2001/02/27
[#11712] RE: Starting Once Again — "Aaron Hinni" <aaron@...> 2001/02/27

> 2. So far I think running under TextPad will be better than running

[#11726] Re: Starting Once Again — Aleksi Niemel<zak@...> 2001/02/28

On Wed, 28 Feb 2001, Aaron Hinni wrote:

[ruby-talk:11394] Re: Time without seconds (updated/fixed)

From: "W. Kent Starr" <elderburn@...>
Date: 2001-02-23 18:06:49 UTC
List: ruby-talk #11394
On Friday 23 February 2001 10:32, David Alan Black wrote:
> On Sat, 24 Feb 2001, Kevin Smith wrote:
> > ts wrote:
> > > Warning you can have a problem
> > > See that t is a Time object and not a MyTime object.
> >
> > Thanks. You are correct. Fortunately, that is
> > easily fixed:
> >
> > class MyTime < Time
> >         def MyTime.createFloor
> >                 t = Time.new
> >                 return MyTime.at(t.to_i() -
> > t.sec)
> >         end
> >         def toto
> >            puts "toto"
> >         end
> > end
> > t = MyTime.createFloor
> > p t.inspect
> > p t.type
> > t.toto
>
> Here's a followup question, based on playing around with this:
> Why do the two ways of doing this (which I've stashed into
> MyTime.floor) result in objects of different types?
>
>   class MyTime < Time
>     def MyTime.floor
>
>   # Way 1
>       t = Time.new
>       mt = MyTime.at t - t.sec
>
>   # Way 2
>       tt = MyTime.at (tm = Time.new) - tm.sec
>
>       [mt,tt].each do |ti|
>         puts "#{ti} is of type #{ti.type}"
>       end
>     end
>   end
>
>   MyTime.floor
>
>   Output:
>   Fri Feb 23 10:31:00 EST 2001 is of type MyTime
>   Fri Feb 23 10:31:00 EST 2001 is of type Time
>
>
FWIW

Time.type #-> Class
class MyTime < Time
end
MyTime.type #-> Class
a = Time.new
b = MyTime.new
a.type #-> Time
b.type #-> MyTime

It appears that a class is of type Class and instances of that class are of 
type #{Name_Of_That_Class}

Interesting (and useful) behavior :-)

Regards,

Kent Starr
elderburn@mindspring.com


In This Thread