[#13775] Problems with racc rule definitions — Michael Neumann <neumann@...>

15 messages 2001/04/17
[#13795] Re: Problems with racc rule definitions — Minero Aoki <aamine@...> 2001/04/18

Hi,

[#13940] From Guido, with love... — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

52 messages 2001/04/20

[#13953] regexp — James Ponder <james@...>

Hi, I'm new to ruby and am coming from a perl background - therefore I

19 messages 2001/04/21

[#14033] Distributed Ruby and heterogeneous networks — harryo@... (Harry Ohlsen)

I wrote my first small distributed application yesterday and it worked

15 messages 2001/04/22

[#14040] RCR: getClassFromString method — ptkwt@...1.aracnet.com (Phil Tomson)

It would be nice to have a function that returns a class type given a

20 messages 2001/04/22

[#14130] Re: Ruby mascot proposal — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneik@...>

Guy N. Hurst wrote:

21 messages 2001/04/24
[#14148] Re: Ruby mascot proposal — Stephen White <spwhite@...> 2001/04/24

On Tue, 24 Apr 2001, Conrad Schneiker wrote:

[#14188] Re: Ruby mascot proposal — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2001/04/25

Hi,

[#14193] Re: Ruby mascot proposal — "W. Kent Starr" <elderburn@...> 2001/04/25

On Tuesday 24 April 2001 23:02, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#14138] Re: python on the smalltalk VM — Conrad Schneiker <schneik@...>

FYI: Thought this might be of interest to the JRuby and Ruby/GUI folks.

27 messages 2001/04/24
[#14153] Re: python on the smalltalk VM — Andrew Kuchling <akuchlin@...> 2001/04/24

Conrad Schneiker <schneik@austin.ibm.com> writes:

[#14154] array#flatten! question — Jim Freeze <jim@...> 2001/04/24

Hello.

[#14159] Can I insert into an array — Jim Freeze <jim@...> 2001/04/24

Ok, this may be a dumb question, but, is it possible to insert into an

[#14162] Re: Can I insert into an array — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2001/04/24

Jim Freeze <jim@freeze.org> writes:

[#14289] RCR: Array#insert — Shugo Maeda <shugo@...> 2001/04/27

At Wed, 25 Apr 2001 01:28:36 +0900,

[#14221] An or in an if. — Tim Pettman <tjp@...>

Hi there,

18 messages 2001/04/25

[#14267] Re: Ruby mascot proposal — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneik@...>

Danny van Bruggen,

16 messages 2001/04/26

[#14452] How to do it the Ruby-way 3 — Stefan Matthias Aust <sma@3plus4.de>

First a question: Why is

21 messages 2001/04/30

[ruby-talk:13944] Re: Negative Reviews for Ruby and ProgrammingRuby

From: oinkoink+unet@..._xx.com (Bret)
Date: 2001-04-20 22:10:03 UTC
List: ruby-talk #13944
In article <0G9B00D37JKHUY@mta6.snfc21.pbi.net>,
Kevin Smith  <sent@qualitycode.com> wrote:
>For me, Ruby is exactly a better-Python, better-
>Perl, and better-Smalltalk. Of course, I disliked 
>each of those languages when I evaluated them, 
>and Ruby avoids the biggest problems of each, for 
>me.

>I think people who love Python will often dislike 
>(or at least be unimpressed with) Ruby. Perhaps 
>that's the same with all three languages.

   It worked differently for me.  Here's one pig's
programming-language odyssey.  I'm a C programmer who
learned Python last year in order to prototype my work
before coding it up in C.  (Also, I wanted an excuse to
learn a new programming language to broaden my
horizons.)  I *do* love Python.  I even like the
grouping-by-indentation that puts so many people off. I
think Python is the most readable programming language
that has real power -- probably the most readable
programming language, period.  I think it's the best
programming language for a beginner with computers (and
I'm trying to coax my non-techie girlfriend to learn
it).

   However, certain things bothered me.  One was the
scoping rules (due to be fixed soon).  Another was the
treatment of Booleans.  Surely such a high-level
language should have explicit `true' and `false'.
Python says that 0, 0.0, the empty list, the empty
dictionary...are false, but other creatures of the same
types are true.  This takes a wart from C (where it may
be sort of excusable because C is at a lower level),
and inflates it to hideous and alarming proportions.
Finally and maybe most importantly, though I was having
fun with OO, I kept wishing that Python was more
thoroughly OO.  I wanted to learn OO thinking, so I
tried to learn smalltalk, but I found myself struggling
with the alien syntax.

   Then I found the wonderful pickaxe book!  Ruby is a
marvelous language; it is the language that I'd really
been looking for for some time.  I was further
delighted to see some very cool math in some extension
libraries (I love math).  I could go on and on about
the things I love about Ruby, but you've already
heard them :-).

   This hasn't turned me against Python however.  I
will probably continue to prototype in it, since it
maps very easily to C and makes for code that other
people can follow easily.  I also will continue to
dabble in other languages.  However, I will code in
Ruby for fun!

                   Regards, Bret

Bret Jolly (Jou Lii Bair)
NB: to email, remove the cow noises and underbar from my domain name.

In This Thread